Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Michael Stone cut
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks-
-09-05-2005 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Cali
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 7,365
- Rep Power
- 58
Michael Stone cut
I thought he was having a good camp, he was brought in to play SP. Any thought on this one?
-
-09-05-2005 #2
Superbowl MVP
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Morgantown, WV
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 17,650
- Rep Power
- 143
Re: Michael Stone cut
He probably lost out on his roster position to Mike Furrey.
Country Roads, Take Them To St. Louis!
-
-09-05-2005 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Fargo,ND
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 618
- Rep Power
- 17
Re: Michael Stone cut
Considering the lack of depth at DB this is a head scratcher. This guy seemed to be around the ball every time he got in the game. Seemed to be a nice fit for ST as well.
-
-09-05-2005 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- St. Louis
- Age
- 27
- Posts
- 1,700
- Rep Power
- 10
Re: Michael Stone cut
We already had 5 safeties on the roster. Just not enough room for him, especially considering he and Mike Furrey are the same type of player.
Stone should get picked up somewhere though.
-
-09-05-2005 #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Jersey
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 1,373
- Rep Power
- 12
Re: Michael Stone cut
I thought this guy was going to make the team, easy. How many years have we needed more players in the secondary. IF we have 5 safeties better than this guy, then we really have improved. Time will Tell.
/
-
-09-06-2005 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Poplar Bluff, MO
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 7,266
- Rep Power
- 64
Re: Michael Stone cut
I agree that a lot of this had to be due to Furrey making the team at S
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks