Results 1 to 15 of 24
Thread: A new low for the rams
-
-12-24-2005 #1
A new low for the rams
Not much to say guys, but we do get a better draft pick. we have to be the worst tackling team in the history of the nfl.
ramming speed to all]
general counsel


-
-12-24-2005 #2
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Glenrothes, SCOTLAND
- Posts
- 8,834
- Blog Entries
- 1
- Rep Power
- 20
Re: A new low for the rams
This has to be an all time low for ANY D in the NFL.
How those players can hold their heads up after that "performance" I just dont know
-
-12-24-2005 #3
Re: A new low for the rams
I haven't gone so far as to tally up strength of schedule or anything, but I did check the draft order as updated on team records and last week's SOS. If Arizona, Oakland, and Baltimore all win, the Rams might in fact move up four spots to seventh overall in the draft. At that position, it's conceivable that we would have a decent shot at a guy like AJ Hawk or Jimmy Williams.

Country Roads, Take Them To St. Louis!
-
-12-24-2005 #4
Re: A new low for the rams
If the season was 5 weeks longer, we might have a shot at the #1 pick. I see no evidence to suggest that this team can beat anyone. the houston win was a miracle.
we have lost to arizona and sf at home. nothing more to say.
ramming speed to all
general counsel

-
-12-24-2005 #5
Re: A new low for the rams
It's not unreasonable to think an underclassmen or two may opt to come out this year too.. Making things even better for our draft.
.
-
-12-24-2005 #6
Re: A new low for the rams
looks like we will be in position to be in the top 10 in the draft. however nothing good comes from a loss, especially to the ******.
-
-12-24-2005 #7
Re: A new low for the rams
This has to be an all time low!!!! enough said!
steve:clanram:"The breakfast Club"
-
-12-24-2005 #8
Re: A new low for the rams
I've been around here for quite some time and have been the "eternal RAM cheerleader", but this has hit an all time low.......Being swept by the team that is ranked 32nd??? Boy, oh boy, we need to wipe the slate clean and start all over here from Front Office down to the waterboy....There are a few keepers and I bet they wish they were somewhere else right now....Dang!!! What a shame of wasted talent that we have had......
Bright spot here.......Whiners aren't getting Bush!!!
-
-12-24-2005 #9
Re: A new low for the rams
This is worse than the 90's because at least you could say the Niners were a good team. They were the worse team in the NFL and they swept us. We might have the better record, but I would have to say we are the worse team in the NFL. Absolutely disgusting.
Sprtsmac :football:
-
-12-24-2005 #10
Re: A new low for the rams
I feel like throwing up !!!!!!! What a bunch of bull#@&*!
73 yard run for a TD nice missed tackle AA
-
-12-24-2005 #11
Re: A new low for the rams
Pathetic...complete disappontment from start to finish...:smoke:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
SJax, a developing quarterbacks best friend...
-
-12-24-2005 #12
Re: A new low for the rams
Didn't see the game (Xmas already here) and don't want to, but now looking forward to that new pair of socks I'm going to get.
Losing to the niners, and the Art Shell rumour............ah well, here's to the draft.
-
-12-24-2005 #13
Re: A new low for the rams
How do you lose both games this season to one of the worst teams in the NFL. OMG, this team has got to take a good look at themselves. Pathetic, just pathetic.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!!
-
-12-25-2005 #14
Re: A new low for the rams
Their is nothing too say at this point , In 46 yrs this one of the worst Rams D I can remember ....:down:
Originally Posted by general counsel
:smoke: :sad: :smoke:
:down:
"Remember its the love for the game ! and our Rams !"

-
-12-25-2005 #15
Re: A new low for the rams
That HOLE on the first run by Sa Fran (73 yard TD), that HOLE was huge .. You don't see that in the NFL. That was Pop-Warner.
Marmie will be lucky to coach outside linebackers somewhere.
.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





Bookmarks