All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.
Home Contact us FAQ

ClanRam
2008 Schedule
Regular Season
9/7 Eagles L 3 - 38
9/14 Giants L 13-41
9/21 Seahawks L 13-37
9/28 Bills L 14-31
10/5
BYE
 
10/12 Redskins - Noon
10/19 Cowboys - Noon
10/26 Patriots - Noon
11/10 Cardinals - Noon
11/10 Jets - Noon
11/16 Whiners - 3:05pm
11/23 Bears - Noon
11/30 Dolphins - Noon
12/7 Cardinals - 3:15pm
12/14 Seahawks - Noon
12/21 Whiners - Noon
12/28 Falcons - Noon
All times Central
Score in italics: Overtime

Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2008 SEASON > RAM TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
dgr828's Avatar
dgr828
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES, CA
Age: 44
Posts: 1,109
Rep Power: 7
dgr828 is a jewel in the roughdgr828 is a jewel in the roughdgr828 is a jewel in the rough
New Rams by the Numbers

Here's a list of the numbers that a few of your new favorite Rams players most likely will be wearing this season.

(0) Sebastian Sejean FS, (R), University of Laval (Quebec, Canada)
(2) Sean Douglas P, (R), Washington
(3) Josh Brown K, (6 yrs), Nebraska
(8) Bruce Gradkowski QB, (3yrs), Toledo
(12) Trent Green QB, (15 yrs), Indiana
(14) Keenan Burton WR, (R), Kentucky
(17) Donnie Avery WR, (R), Houston
(18) Eric Fowler WR2, (R), Wisconsin-Whitewater
(32) Justin King LCB, (R), Penn State
(58) David Vorbora SLB, (R), Idaho
(62) Dustin Fry C, (R), Clemson
(67) Roy Schuening RG, (R), Oregon State
(72) Chris Long RDE, (R), Virginia
(79) John Greco, RT, (R), Toledo
(86) Reche Caldwell WR, (7 yrs), Florida
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
Josh's Avatar
Josh
Status: Offline
Made the Ram Roster (just)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 0
Josh - will become famous soon enoughJosh - will become famous soon enough
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Dustin Fry isnt a rookie he was a draft choice last year. and doesnt ron bartell wear number 32?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
RamOfDenmark's Avatar
RamOfDenmark
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 24
Posts: 789
Rep Power: 8
RamOfDenmark is a name known to allRamOfDenmark is a name known to allRamOfDenmark is a name known to allRamOfDenmark is a name known to allRamOfDenmark is a name known to allRamOfDenmark is a name known to all
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

It's possible to wear number #0? Don't think I've ever seen that.

For the receivers I've always preferred numbers like 80, 81 etc. and not those 14, 17 numbers - 80-something just looks like a receiver to me for some reason and those other numbers don't
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #4 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
TheBritishRam's Avatar
TheBritishRam
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 20
Posts: 283
Rep Power: 4
TheBritishRam has a spectacular aura aboutTheBritishRam has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamOfDenmark View Post
It's possible to wear number #0? Don't think I've ever seen that.

For the receivers I've always preferred numbers like 80, 81 etc. and not those 14, 17 numbers - 80-something just looks like a receiver to me for some reason and those other numbers don't
Jim Otto wore 00 his entire career, not sure if anyone would be allowed to do it again though
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
jkramsfan's Avatar
jkramsfan
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clifton Park,N.Y.
Age: 44
Posts: 2,586
Rep Power: 15
jkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to beholdjkramsfan is a splendid one to behold
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

I feel bad for the guy wearing "0", cannot be a good way to start your career.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
shower beers's Avatar
shower beers
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 369
Rep Power: 2
shower beers - will become famous soon enoughshower beers - will become famous soon enough
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Cool info. Thanks a lot!

Did Brown wear no. 2 in Seattle? You think he would have more seniority over a rookie punter for that number here in St. Louis.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #7 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
Keenum's Avatar
Keenum
Status: Offline
Ram MVP
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Age: 20
Posts: 1,195
Rep Power: 8
Keenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of light
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

"00" I believe was retired by the NFL, so nobody could wear it ever again. I think Jim Otto was the last person to ever wear it.

But these are training camp numbers, right? So maybe the team can let players wear whatever they want during this time.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
Bald_81's Avatar
Bald_81
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 19
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 4
Bald_81 - will become famous soon enoughBald_81 - will become famous soon enough
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh View Post
Dustin Fry isnt a rookie he was a draft choice last year. and doesnt ron bartell wear number 32?
Bartell wears #24. King took Bly's old number...hopefully he turns out to be a steal as well!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old -06-07-2008
majorram's Avatar
majorram
Status: Online
Ram MVP
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: London surrey
Age: 37
Posts: 1,327
Rep Power: 10
majorram has a spectacular aura aboutmajorram has a spectacular aura aboutmajorram has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkramsfan View Post
I feel bad for the guy wearing "0", cannot be a good way to start your career.

I was thinking the same, well hes OUT the door come cuts!!


steve
__________________
Live and die, always a Rams fan!!!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #10 (permalink)  
Old -07-07-2008
Fortuninerhater's Avatar
Fortuninerhater
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A., Ca.
Posts: 702
Rep Power: 7
Fortuninerhater is just really niceFortuninerhater is just really niceFortuninerhater is just really niceFortuninerhater is just really niceFortuninerhater is just really nice
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenum View Post
"00" I believe was retired by the NFL, so nobody could wear it ever again. I think Jim Otto was the last person to ever wear it.

But these are training camp numbers, right? So maybe the team can let players wear whatever they want during this time.


Wide Receiver Kenny Burroughs of the Houston Oilers wore 00 slightly after Jim Otto. So it may or may not be retired.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old -07-07-2008
RamsFan16's Avatar
RamsFan16
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Age: 19
Posts: 5,044
Rep Power: 11
RamsFan16 has a spectacular aura aboutRamsFan16 has a spectacular aura aboutRamsFan16 has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Minor complaint. Does it annoy anyone else when a receiver wears a number not in the 80s?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old -08-07-2008
KoaKoi's Avatar
KoaKoi
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 6
KoaKoi is just really niceKoaKoi is just really niceKoaKoi is just really niceKoaKoi is just really niceKoaKoi is just really nice
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

I agree that I prefer the WR numbers to be in the 80's. However, I don't feel like they should be restricted to choosing 1 of 10 possible number choices considering how many players each team fields at the position.

let's go thru alternatives:

WR's wearing a number...

in the 90's? nah, that's DL territory.
in the 70's? see above.
in the 60's? can't have the OL get dissed.
in the 50's? could work, but seems funny.
in the 40's? could work, but again seems funny and treading on the Safeties.
in the 30's? eh..., starting to take over the RB area and the numerous secondary positions.
in the 20's? definitely gonna make the rb's confused and hurt their feelings

which leaves 0-20 which is the other number range that WR's commonly use in addition to something in the 80's.

While I prefer in the 80's, there are not enough kickers and qb's to use up all 1- 19. So if they're gonna take any other numbers, i like em taking numbers from the kickers and QB's.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #13 (permalink)  
Old -11-07-2008
keith m. klink's Avatar
keith m. klink
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 857
Rep Power: 4
keith m. klink is a jewel in the roughkeith m. klink is a jewel in the roughkeith m. klink is a jewel in the rough
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Teams can issue a" 00 ", BUT " 0 " cannot . the wearing of a single " 0 " brings some confusion to referee because of the ability lose that single number in a sea of numbers . Or my opinion , that it gives that player wearing it the stigma of playing with what is a BULLSEYE on your chest . not so good.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old -11-07-2008
moklerman's Avatar
moklerman
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,589
Rep Power: 12
moklerman is a name known to allmoklerman is a name known to allmoklerman is a name known to allmoklerman is a name known to allmoklerman is a name known to allmoklerman is a name known to all
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Can someone please get to Trent Green and talk him out of wearing the Rams kiss of death? #12 is the worst possible number for a Rams QB. Historically, #12 is an iconic number for QB's but nothing remotely close for the Rams.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old -11-07-2008
chipperjones's Avatar
chipperjones
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 537
Rep Power: 4
chipperjones has a spectacular aura aboutchipperjones has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

Actually, Sebastian Sejean was part of that thing where they assign a foreign player to each team for the practice squad and it dosent count against them for the year. We cant release him. Correct me if Im wrong.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jim Thomas Live RamWraith RAM TALK 2 -23-04-2008 01:57 AM
Gordo Live RamWraith RAM TALK 2 -18-03-2008 12:59 AM
Jim Thomas Live-Feb. 5th RamWraith RAM TALK 2 -06-02-2008 05:24 PM
Historical Moments # 2 The rest of the story OldRamsfan RAM TALK 6 -21-04-2006 04:42 PM
RAMS Tale of The Tape OldRamsfan RAM TALK 3 -09-01-2006 08:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.comAd Management by RedTyger