All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.
Home Contact Us FAQ

ClanRam
header
round 1
round 2
round 3
round 4
round4b


Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2007 SEASON > RAM TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -07-08-2004
RamDez's Avatar
RamDez
Status: Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Glenrothes, Fife, Scotland
Posts: 6,576
Rep Power: 20
RamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant futureRamDez has a brilliant future
Talking NFL emphasizes its intent to enforce illegal contact rule

NFL emphasizes its intent to enforce illegal contact rule
By Jim Thomas

Of the Post-Dispatch
08/07/2004




MACOMB, Ill. - In his first go-around on the NFL's competition committee, Rams coach Mike Martz practically made illegal contact on pass plays a crusade during the offseason.

Those efforts bore fruit when the NFL made illegal contact a "point of emphasis" for game officials at the league meetings last March. And this weekend at Western Illinois University, visiting game officials have started the "emphasizing."

Referee Bernie Kukar, back judge Steve Freeman, side judge Tom Hill and head linesman Phil McKinnely arrived in Macomb on Thursday to work the joint practices and scrimmage between the Rams and the Chicago Bears.

Among the points they are making to defensive players and coaches is that the illegal contact rule on pass defense will be more strictly enforced this year.

"Points of emphasis simply are things that we want to pay a little closer attention to," said Kukar, who worked the Rams-New England Super Bowl following the 2001 season. "They're not changes in the rule - the rule has always been there."

In the case of illegal contact, the league has decided - with much prodding from Martz - that its officials have been giving too much leeway to the defense. Too much leeway in terms of allowing contact more than 5 yards downfield. And too much leeway in determining what was - and what was not - incidental contact by defenders.

"From an officiating standpoint, when you're 25 yards downfield and you're looking at this play happening ... it's pretty hard to determine where 5 yards are," Kukar said.

That's one of the reasons, Kukar said, that game officials became more flexible over the years when trying to determine whether contact occurred 5 yards down field. Or 5 1/2. Or 6 yards.

But not anymore.

"All we're saying is pay more attention to that stuff," Kukar said. "Five yards is 5 yards, and any contact after 5 yards should be called."

Also, there will be less flexibility in terms of incidental contact. Defensive players simply can't knock wide receivers off routes more than 5 yards down the field.

Along those lines, Kukar said any pulling of a receiver's jersey by a defender now will be regarded as illegal contact. (Or holding.) No longer will game officials be asked to determine whether the jersey-grabbing actually restricted a receiver from running his route.

There will be less gray area. At least that's the theory. But in the real world - on game day - will the illegal contact rule actually be more strictly enforced this season?

"It's supposed to be," Martz said Friday. "So I would imagine it would be."

Kukar had lunch with Martz on Friday in Macomb. On the practice field, Kukar and the three other game officials have been stressing this new point of emphasis with Rams and Bears players.


__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -07-08-2004
Caramsfan's Avatar
Caramsfan
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
Caramsfan - is sitting in the middle of the road
Re: NFL emphasizes its intent to enforce illegal contact rule

Thanks for the reiteration. The game was becoming a farce in the defensive backfields around the League allowing teams with less skilled defensive backs to compete with the likes of Bruce and Holt who would otherwise run roughshod through the secondery.

Watch for the new Rams big three of Holt, Bruce and Curtis with Looker as the new Ricky Proehl to have many more YAC when they aren't weighted down with a 190lb cornerback clinging to their Jersey with the tenacity of a tic.
The only people who will whine about this are the same one's that said the RAMS should have "adjusted" to the non-enforcement of the rules. By the same token these teams will have to "adjust" to new emphasis put on enforcement.
Bump and run isn't being outlawed as some big name writers have put in print. True bump and RUN means you tie up the receiver at the line with constant contact all the way to 5 yards then release and RUN with the receiver and either stay with him in man coverage or pass him off to the next leval if the receiver leaves your zone.

Just my two cents.

It will be nice to see Bruce and Holt not have to dress themselves after every pass pattern they run if the d-back is kind enough to return their jersey to them following the play.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -07-08-2004
RAMMAN68's Avatar
RAMMAN68
Status: Offline
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Escondido, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 2,738
Rep Power: 8
RAMMAN68 is a jewel in the roughRAMMAN68 is a jewel in the roughRAMMAN68 is a jewel in the rough
Re: NFL emphasizes its intent to enforce illegal contact rule

It will be interesting to see just how much the league inforces this rule.
I guess this means that you can count the Pats out of the playoffs this year. :tough:
__________________
RAMS TRADITION AND PRIDE


"HIT HARD, HIT FAST, AND HIT OFTEN"
Adm. William "Bull" Halsey
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA changes spearing rule to make the game safer DJRamFan COLLEGE 0 -28-08-2005 04:31 PM
Salary Cap Request HUbison RAM TALK 7 -31-12-2004 07:48 AM
Rams hope refs get strict on illegal contact RamWraith RAM TALK 0 -06-11-2004 01:21 AM
Clayton: Cracking Down on Corners Nick RAM TALK 11 -24-07-2004 02:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.


ClanRam
header
ticket booth
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
Maddux Sports
Offers expert NFL Picks
against NFL betting lines
bar
bar
bar
bar
advertise
 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.comAd Management by RedTyger