Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-07-30-2010 #1
No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
BY JIM THOMAS | Posted: Friday, July 30, 2010 3:04 pm
Contrary to speculative reports, the St. Louis Rams have not reached an agreement with No. 1 overall draft pick Sam Bradford.
And contrary to more speculation, Bradford will not be in attendance at tonight's full-squad meeting -- the first full-squad gathering of this training camp. This according to two sources with direct knowledge of the negotiations.
In fact, Bradford cannot attend any team functions, be it a team meeting or practice, until he has signed a contract.
According to one of the sources, the Rams have offered Bradford the richest rookie contract in NFL history. It's one that exceeds the six-year, $72 million deal signed by the 2009 No. 1 draft pick -- quarterback Matthew Stafford -- but falls short of the $80 million plateau.
Both sides continue to work on a deal. The Rams are trying to get Bradford on the field in time for Saturday's 3 p.m. practice _ the first full-squad practice of camp. The Rams concluded their prelude to camp on Friday with the third practice in two days involving 37 rookies and selected veterans.

Country Roads, Take Them To St. Louis!
-
-07-30-2010 #2
Re: No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
Come on Sam, if the numbers have been agreed upon, it's pretty much down to semantics. While it's true that you won't be missing any reps until tomorrow at 3, it's still to your benefit not to miss anything more, whether it's a meeting, or practice, or a rookie hazing ordeal. Tell your agent to get over the semantics and just get your overly inflated paycheck.
I believe!
-
-07-30-2010 #3
Re: No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
Hold the line Demoff! Bradford can only have the yellow M&Ms removed from his bowl, not the yellow and the blue.
-
-07-30-2010 #4
Re: No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
The size of the contract has no relevance. The only thing that counts is the guaranteed dollars, and no one is reporting the bid ask on those numbers.
ramming speed to all
general counsel

-
-07-30-2010 #5
-
-07-30-2010 #6
Re: No Bradford deal yet despite offer between $72-$80 million
Some interesting numbers when you compare some top picks last year to top picks this year. The difference between 2010 fourth overall pick Trent Williams and 2009 fourth overall pick Aaron Curry isn't that big (< $3 million in guaranteed money), but there are some big differences between 2010 fifth overall pick Eric Berry and 2009 fifth overall pick Mark Sanchez ($6 million in guaranteed money).
First overall pick Matthew Stafford's deal last year contained $41.75 million guaranteed, and some have predicted Bradford could come away with as much as $50 million guaranteed. It's going to be very interesting to see where this contract lands, but wherever it is, it's going to be the richest contract ever given out to a rookie player. And if the league gets a new CBA with a rookie wage scale, it will stay that way in the history books.
Country Roads, Take Them To St. Louis!
Similar Threads
-
Atogwe's deal doesn't provide security he wanted ..
By MauiRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 2Last Post: -07-22-2010, 02:14 PM -
Sam Bradford hopes to have contract by training camp ..
By MauiRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 8Last Post: -07-12-2010, 11:20 AM -
Atogwe's contract is really only one-year, $4.1 million deal
By Nick in forum RAM TALKReplies: 3Last Post: -07-07-2010, 08:24 PM -
Long dollars ...
By MauiRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 17Last Post: -06-01-2008, 12:22 AM -
Salary Cap Numbers as of 4/11 wednesday
By rampete in forum RAM TALKReplies: 4Last Post: -04-14-2007, 04:16 AM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks