Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Not Necessarily Rebuilding.
-
-11-21-2011 #1
Not Necessarily Rebuilding.
Loved Dez's "The Rams Suck" post for several reasons. A), because they do, B), because I don't recall Dez posting as much as of late, and C), because of the responses it provoked.
Anyway, they do, and are simply unwatchable. For the first time in 45 years, I left both this and last week at halftime. The reasons are all debatable, and enough has been said about that, but bottom line, they do suck. Period.
So, point is, that while I don't necessarily advocate it, have no objections to cleaning house, meaning Spags and Devaney. The initial argument against this is typically is "here we go, starting all over again". This simply isn't the case. The Rams have several IMPORTANT pieces already in place, which was not the case three years ago, have a real owner, and a franchise QB.
I will trust Stan on this one, but really don't care either way.

-
-11-21-2011 #2
Similar Threads
-
I think the Rams will draft Suh at no. 1, but wont necessarily keep him...
By tomahawk247 in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 8Last Post: -02-25-2010, 06:32 PM -
WR core rebuilding?
By Lange in forum RAM TALKReplies: 12Last Post: -10-07-2009, 04:14 PM -
Rams: Rebuilding
By THEFIELDGOAL in forum Articles by TheFieldGoalReplies: 0Last Post: -08-30-2009, 01:39 AM -
A + B does not necessarily = C
By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 13Last Post: -05-16-2009, 12:41 PM -
Rebuilding year?
By LaRamsFanLongTime in forum RAM TALKReplies: 5Last Post: -11-08-2004, 05:59 AM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks