Page 7 of 42 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 624
Like Tree150Likes

Thread: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

  1. #91
    Boosh's Avatar
    Boosh is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    14
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by HUbison View Post
    That's a pretty tall order though. I mean we're talking about the St. Louis Cardinals, the best MLB franchise money CAN'T buy. They've been home almost ten times as long as the Rams have. Having said that, you're absolutely right; the Rams need to do more to tap into the Cardinal culture. Winning solves everything (the Ed was the place during the GSOT), but the Rams need to take more steps to engrain their mark on the St. Louis vista. If they do tap into the Cardinal culture, they will re-discover and finally earn the St. Louis fanbase.
    I seems that a lot of Cardinals fans like to play ignorant of the Rams, some to the point that they take pride in this ignorance. The blind following of Cardinals/baseball is ingrained St. Louis from birth and unfortunately the Rams have not been a part landscape for this effect to take root. I still see folks that are born and raised St. Louisans raising their children as Packer and Chiefs (shudder) fans. This attitude needs to change and the best way to do that is to put a winning team on the field and promoting the team to the community. Last season there was very minimal promotions... radio ads, billboards, commercials, or other promotions. I really hope that Stan promotes the team this season but even if they move somewhere else, I'll be crushed but still a true Rams fan.


  2. #92
    netminder's Avatar
    netminder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    NFL Lockout Agreement Includes Provision For Los Angeles Stadium. Welcome back home boys.

  3. #93
    RAMpage28's Avatar
    RAMpage28 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    60
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Should have invited Adam Rank to this party so we can all have one big happy ***** off.

  4. #94
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,532
    Rep Power
    144

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by netminder View Post
    NFL Lockout Agreement Includes Provision For Los Angeles Stadium. Welcome back home boys.
    Absolutely, netminder. So true. Get this CBA signed, end the lockout, and head back home to Rams Park. It's about time.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  5. #95
    ZiaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,530
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by netminder View Post
    NFL Lockout Agreement Includes Provision For Los Angeles Stadium. Welcome back home boys.
    What's this mean?

  6. #96
    netminder's Avatar
    netminder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    It means st louis better pony up for a staduim or stan will take his boys back home and yes stan has a house in malibu only an hour from the staduim.

  7. #97
    sjacksonrules's Avatar
    sjacksonrules is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    southern il
    Posts
    1,450
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by netminder View Post
    It means st louis better pony up for a staduim or stan will take his boys back home and yes stan has a house in malibu only an hour from the staduim.
    You do realize he has a mansion in Columbia, Mo which is two hrs from st louis. Which him being a real estate billionaire I would assume it is in the exact location he wants it to be in. He was born in Columbia. He just bought the team he isn't going to sell it after so many years of trying to being majority owner. He was there in l.a. last time so he knows what it is like. There is just to much going on out there for you guys to pay attention to one thing. There are to many teams in california as it and that is just football I am talking about. The Rams are just as much a part of Illinois so they are kinda shared. All I see are Rams games here I barely see a bears game unless a Rams game isn't on.

    We have a good owner and that wants to establish this team in MO. Just sit down and enjoy the ride.
    Ramendola16 likes this.

  8. #98
    LA Rammer's Avatar
    LA Rammer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wilmington, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,679
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by sjacksonrules View Post
    You do realize he has a mansion in Columbia
    Got scared there for a while thought we were going to start the "Official (and only) Rams to South America" thread!
    LA RAMMER

    It's Jim not Chris
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HNgqQVHI_8

  9. #99
    Flippin' Ram's Avatar
    Flippin' Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,434
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by LA Rammer View Post
    Got scared there for a while thought we were going to start the "Official (and only) Rams to South America" thread!
    Heard players can get paid more through getting involved in illegal drug activities if that were the case.

    EDIT: Typo
    Last edited by Flippin' Ram; -07-21-2011 at 12:54 AM.

  10. #100
    netminder's Avatar
    netminder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Don Banks of SI.com was on Dan Patrick this morning talking about the possibility of a team to moving to Los Angeles. Banks said that he thinks Roger Goodell will put this on his priority list and that it will be a relocation of one of these teams (in order of most likely to least likely).

    1) San Diego
    2) St. Louis
    3) Minnesota
    4) Jacksonville

  11. #101
    Ramendola16's Avatar
    Ramendola16 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Age
    20
    Posts
    364
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by netminder View Post
    Don Banks of SI.com was on Dan Patrick this morning talking about the possibility of a team to moving to Los Angeles. Banks said that he thinks Roger Goodell will put this on his priority list and that it will be a relocation of one of these teams (in order of most likely to least likely).

    1) San Diego
    2) St. Louis
    3) Minnesota
    4) Jacksonville
    Good thing Goodell doesn't own the Rams, then.

  12. #102
    Flippin' Ram's Avatar
    Flippin' Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,434
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    MOD'S NOTE: This will be the one and only "Rams to L.A." thread. If you are interested in this topic, and wish to discuss it, this is the place. Any additional threads started on this topic will be deleted.

    So is this the lounge to beat dead horses?

  13. #103
    sjacksonrules's Avatar
    sjacksonrules is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    southern il
    Posts
    1,450
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    I figured this topic would of died by now....

  14. #104
    netminder's Avatar
    netminder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    LOS ANGELES -- Now that the NFL has ended its lockout, the focus for most around the country will shift toward the action on the field. That is, unless you live in Los Angeles, where the focus remains on getting the NFL back into the city for the first time in 16 years.

    Luckily for those who have been relegated to making the two-hour drive south to San Diego or the six-hour drive north to Oakland or San Francisco to watch NFL games in person, it appears the league could possibly return to Los Angeles as early as next season.

    If one of two local groups (Anschutz Entertainment Group and Majestic Realty Company) proposing to privately finance a state-of-the-art football stadium are able to sign an NFL team to a long-term lease after this season, a team could move into either the Coliseum or Rose Bowl for the 2012 season and play there until its new home is built.

    Those who have been following this long saga aren't holding their breath, but here's what to keep track of this season as you're watching the NFL being played in other cities.
    Keep an eye on …


    The San Diego Chargers and St. Louis Rams have undertaken ongoing efforts to get new stadiums in their current cities, and one of these franchises is the likeliest candidate to move to Los Angeles.








    For nearly a decade the Chargers have tried and failed to get a new stadium built in San Diego to replace the 45-year-old Qualcomm Stadium, which is one of the five oldest stadiums in the league. The difficulty for the Chargers is that it's almost impossible to get public funding in the state of California for a stadium. Take a look around the NFL and MLB. Three of the five oldest stadiums in both the NFL and MLB are in California. In the past 20 years, it has gone from commonplace to standard practice for NFL teams to demand that stadiums be built with public funding. Since 1992, 21 of the 22 NFL stadiums built or proposed have included anywhere from 12 percent to 100 percent public funding. On average, 63 percent of the funding used to complete the stadiums came from the public. That kind of public funding simply won't be available to the Chargers.

    The Chargers can announce their intentions to leave San Diego between Feb. 1 and May 1 of each year through 2020 if they pay off the bonds, which currently would be about $26 million, used to expand Qualcomm Stadium in 1997.

    Not only do the Chargers need a new home that they are unlikely to get in San Diego, but Chargers owner Alex Spanos -- who suffers from dementia and turns 88 in September -- announced last year he is looking to sell a minority stake in the club to help with estate planning. While AEG is open to buying a majority interest in a team, to start construction in L.A. it needs only a minority interest (somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 percent) and a 30-year lease for the team to play in Farmers Field. Spanos and his wife, Faye, own 36 percent of the Chargers, while their four children, including team president, Dean, each own 15 percent. Two minority owners control the other 4 percent. The Spanos family is planning to continue holding a controlling stake.




    The prospects of the Rams getting a home they're happy with in St. Louis seem as remote as the Chargers' chances of getting one in San Diego. The Rams, owned by Philip Anschutz's friend and fellow Denver billionaire Stan Kroenke, can get out of their lease agreement with the St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission in 2015 if the Edward Jones Dome doesn't rank in the top quarter of stadiums in the NFL. It is currently one of the league's older stadiums, and anything outside of a new stadium would make it impossible for it to rank among the league's top eight facilities. Getting public funding for such an expensive undertaking in St. Louis, which is still paying off the original construction debt of the Dome, would be virtually impossible.


    The St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission has until Feb. 1 to give the Rams a preliminary proposal for how it plans to give the Dome "top-tier" status. The Rams can either agree to the offer a month later or reject it and make a counteroffer by May 1, which is the most likely scenario. The commission can then either agree to the counteroffer by June 1 or reject it and go to arbitration. If such a scenario unfolds, the lease could be voided and the Rams could rent the Dome on a year-to-year basis or choose to move elsewhere. If Farmers Field is in position to break ground on June 1 as projected, Los Angeles could be looking at the return of the Rams.

    Get excited about …




    Leiweke
    The Los Angeles City Council is working quickly with AEG to get a deal in place to begin the construction on Farmers Field. After Monday's press conference to announce the "Memorandum of Understanding" -- basically the framework of an agreement between AEG and the city -- many in attendance marveled at how fast the process has moved along. AEG president and CEO Tim Leiweke essentially laid out his plan to bring the NFL back to Los Angeles in December, and he may get the support of City Council to do just that before August, which is an unheard of turnaround for a billion-dollar project on city-owned land.


    Don't forget about …




    Roski
    Billionaire developer Ed Roski has proposed a plan to build a 75,000-seat stadium on a 600-acre site on the northern side of the 57 and 60 freeway interchange in the City of Industry. The project is, in the words of those within the Majestic Realty Company, "shovel-ready," but there hasn't been a shovel on the site in the two years since the green light was given to begin construction. Like AEG, Majestic wants a commitment from an NFL team before breaking ground and wants at least a similar 30 percent stake in a team, but has yet to make any real headway with possible teams.


    Since only one stadium will be built, the first group to lure an NFL team to Los Angeles and break ground will win this nearly yearlong war of words between the development groups.

    Pay attention to …



    The timelines being set forth by the city and AEG are key, and so are the timelines of the teams rumored to be coming to Los Angeles. They aren't as exciting as the games on your pocket schedule, but these dates will determine how soon the NFL could be back in L.A.

    The Herd with Colin Cowherd


    AEG President Tim Leiweke talks about trying to bring an NFL team to Los Angeles. Leiweke's group wants to pledge private money and over a billion dollars to bring a team and hopefully the Super Bowl to Los Angeles.
    More Podcasts




    After a series of hearings this week on the "Memorandum of Understanding" agreed to by the city and AEG, the City Council will vote on the deal before Aug. 20, when it goes on a two-week recess. If the deal passes (only a simple majority is needed), AEG would spend $45 million on design drawings for the new Pico Hall of the Los Angeles Convention Center and Farmers Field. Sometime in September, AEG and the city would begin discussions on the definitive agreements.

    By the end of May, AEG wants to be done with the environmental impact report, entitlement process and the definitive agreements with the city so construction can begin on the new Pico Hall of the Los Angeles Convention Center as well as two new parking structures AEG will construct and operate on city-owned land on Cherry Street and Bond Street before AEG can begin construction of the stadium. However, AEG will need to have a contract in place with an NFL team. That's where the above timelines of the Chargers' and Rams' stadium leases come into play.

    If construction of the Convention Center and parking structures begins sometime in June, those buildings are expected to open sometime in the summer or fall of 2013, at which point the West Hall of the Convention Center would be demolished and construction of Farmers Field would begin; September 2016 would be the targeted opening date.
    Keep in perspective …



    Los Angeles hasn't had an NFL team since 1994 and has seen dozens of proposals and plans to bring a team back. Skepticism isn't only understandable, it's more than expected. If this time feels different, however, it's because it is. The NFL will be returning to Los Angeles in the near future. The only questions now appear to be when and with what team or teams.
    Arash Markazi is a columnist and writer for ESPNLosAngeles.com.

  15. #105
    netminder's Avatar
    netminder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: OFFICIAL (and only) "Rams to L.A." Thread

    I know what the st Louis fans are going through happened to me 17 years ago. You will soon find where Stans loyalty stand. Leases are meant to be broke and Aeg said they will pay for any leases to be broke. Did I mention that Anschutz and Stan are good friends from Denver. The writing is on the wall.

Similar Threads

  1. *Official Rams @ Saints Prediction Thread
    By LA Rammer in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: -12-12-2010, 05:47 PM
  2. Replies: 218
    Last Post: -10-11-2009, 04:50 PM
  3. Replies: 305
    Last Post: -10-04-2009, 08:26 PM
  4. The Official Gibril Wilson For Next Rams SS Thread
    By THOLTFAN81 in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: -02-26-2009, 12:33 PM
  5. *Official Rams vs. Jags Gametime Thread
    By LA Rammer in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -10-30-2005, 05:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •