All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.
Home Contact us FAQ

ClanRam
2008 Schedule
Regular Season
9/7 Eagles L 3 - 38
9/14 Giants L 13-41
9/21 Seahawks L 13-37
9/28 Bills L 14-31
10/5
BYE
 
10/12 Redskins W 19-17
10/19 Cowboys W 34-14
10/26 Patriots L 16-23
11/10 Cardinals L 13-34
11/10 Jets L 3-47
11/16 Whiners L 16-35
11/23 Bears L 3-27
11/30 Dolphins L 12-16
12/7 Cardinals - 3:15pm
12/14 Seahawks - Noon
12/21 Whiners - Noon
12/28 Falcons - Noon
All times Central
Score in italics: Overtime

Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2008 SEASON > RAM TALK

Notices

View Poll Results: What Personnel Move (or Non-Move) Concerns You Most?
Relying on Greene and Berlin behind Bulger/No developmental QB 11 16.67%
Assuming that Witherspoon, Tinoisamoa, Culberson and Draft will be enough at LB. 19 28.79%
Not seeking an upgrade over Corey Chavous. 22 33.33%
Not obtaining a veteran starting CB. 5 7.58%
If Leonard is bulking up to play FB, is Pittman enough behind Jackson? 3 4.55%
Jacob Bell is nice, but we needed another veteran OL. 3 4.55%
Other (specify below). 3 4.55%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
AvengerRam's Avatar
AvengerRam
Status: Online
Mild Mannered Mod
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,528
Rep Power: 45
AvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond repute
Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

What aspect of the new roster do you think should have been addressed differently?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
DistantRam's Avatar
DistantRam
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mauritius
Age: 36
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 2
DistantRam has a spectacular aura aboutDistantRam has a spectacular aura about
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

While other areas remain a concern, the lack of adequate cover for Bulger is the most worrying. If his ribs don't hold this season (or he acquires another injury), we're going to be in deep trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
Chris58's Avatar
Chris58
Status: Offline
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington
Age: 59
Posts: 593
Rep Power: 8
Chris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to beholdChris58 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I went with "other". Not having a good enough set of receivers. Jury is out on Bennett; Holt's knee is a worry. Our draftees are unproven, and our hold overs from the practice squad have not demonstrated anything yet. Other than McMichael, all the receivers have some question marks about them.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
cfh128's Avatar
cfh128
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Age: 25
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 3
cfh128 - will become famous soon enoughcfh128 - will become famous soon enough
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I voted for our lack of linebacker depth. We did basically nothing to account for the loss of Chillar, and even with him our linebackers weren't the greatest. Aside from Spoon, we are relying on a guy who hasn't been able to stay healthy (Pisa), a special teams standout with one career start (Culberson), a guy brought in for depth purposes (Draft), and a handful of late round/undrafted rookies. A couple injuries here and we could be in serious trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
txramsfan's Avatar
txramsfan
Status: Offline
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 5,847
Rep Power: 24
txramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud of
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

Here's a shocker.....

I went with the not obtaining a veteran CB.....

__________________
Why do people say "I don't mean to interrupt BUT". If you don't mean to interrupt, don't interrupt.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -23-05-2008
evil disco man's Avatar
evil disco man
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Age: 23
Posts: 1,634
Rep Power: 19
evil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud ofevil disco man has much to be proud of
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I voted for not replacing Corey Chavous, with the Trent Green acquisition in close second. Chavous has the smarts to survive but is becoming a liability in the secondary. Is Green really an upgrade over the Gus Frerotte disaster of last year? It's nice that he knows the Saunders system, but other than that he doesn't bring much to the table. Maybe the Rams will get lucky and sign a solid 3rd option (a Ryan Fitzpatrick comeback with C. Palmer's little brother now on the Bengals? Byron Leftwich? Jeff George? Jim Everett?) by the time training camp is finished.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
RamWraith's Avatar
RamWraith
Status: Online
Pinball Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minnesota
Age: 38
Posts: 8,175
Rep Power: 42
RamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

Safety spot is our biggest concern heading into the the season IMO. If this Bass kid works out and is a surprise (which I think he had a great upside last year) it might help....
__________________

"I would much rather have a bottle in front of me than a
frontal lobotomy"!!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
stlramman's Avatar
stlramman
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 3
stlramman - will become famous soon enough
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I agree with cfh128 and voted for the LB situation. They once found a diamond in the rough by the name of London, and seem to be hoping that lightning strikes twice(in more ways than one) I was mildly surprised that they did not address this situation in the draft and instead only signed Rookie Free Agents. Hopefully Culberson makes them look real smart! An upgrade for Chavous would be my second choice.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
Ramer's Avatar
Ramer
Status: Offline
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 601
Rep Power: 3
Ramer has a spectacular aura aboutRamer has a spectacular aura about
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I like Green but he has had one to many head injuries. Bulger took a beating last season. Lets hope our line stays health this year.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
Goldenfleece's Avatar
Goldenfleece
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: D.C. Suburbs
Age: 27
Posts: 2,010
Rep Power: 21
Goldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud of
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I went with the lack of a replacement for Chavous. With the budget being particularly tight this year, an underwhelming choice of free agents, and several pressing priorities in the draft that couldn't be ignored, I wouldn't have expected us to do much in most of the areas that are still lacking.

We could have gotten a developmental quarterback late in the draft, but it isn't going to make a big difference if we wait another year and pick one up in the next draft. Bulger easily has 3-4 more years before he has to be replaced.

Kawika Mitchell would have been a decent signing at linebacker and affordable at 5 years, $17.5 million, but Chillar spurned our offer and we couldn't afford Calvin Pace if we wanted him.

We couldn't afford a corner good enough to replace Brown or Hill in the lineup, and we are stocked up on young guys right now.

I think Leonard could still slide back into the halfback role even with some more weight on him, and we still have Travis Minor in a pinch.

We picked up probably the second best lineman available in free agency and added two more draftees. We hardly need more offensive linemen right now.


But safety I think we could have addressed. We could have gotten Steltz in the fourth, Corey Lynch was still on the board in the sixth, and Josh Barrett lasted all the way to the seventh. Granted, we didn't have any picks between 157 and 228, but I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard to arrange a trade to get a sixth or seventh round pick. Or we could have made a play for Gibril Wilson in free agency, who is in his prime (26) and would have cost about as much as we payed Jacob Bell.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
39thebeast's Avatar
39thebeast
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: conecticut
Posts: 1,015
Rep Power: 6
39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

I would have gone with finding an upgrade over chavous, but there really wasn't anything out there draft or FA wise besides Gibril Wilson who I would have rather spent the money for him on Bell. I went with getting someone behind S-jax. It is a 2 back league we really don't have anyone behind him Pittman is still unproven, Minor is more of a special teamer and Leonard realy isn't being relied on as a RB anymore. There is still hope with guys like Michael Pittman out there.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
Bar-bq's Avatar
Bar-bq
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,546
Rep Power: 20
Bar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant future
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

Offensive linemen. Sure, bell is versatile, but can we guarantee either greco or scheuning or setterstrom can step into his spot?

Do we even have a starting center? We have a bunch of hopefuls, but nought is proven. I think the lack of a snapper could come back to bite us if it turns out neither Romberg or Setterstrom are what we're looking for at Center.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
general counsel's Avatar
general counsel
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: atlanta, georgia
Age: 46
Posts: 3,945
Rep Power: 29
general counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

Waivng Isaac Bruce and not resigning Steussie

ramming speed to all

general counsel
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
helorm341's Avatar
helorm341
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ram country
Posts: 255
Rep Power: 2
helorm341 - is moving towards the light
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

Looking at that poll it really makes me realize that they did address most of my concerns..

Of that list I voted for the LB corps one. I don't really know much about Culberson, a veteran would have been nice, but I can't count Culberson out either. There weren't really any good FA LBs out there and we just would have drafted another one if we felt Culberson wasn't good.

Also another OLman would have been nice. Although I think we're set with Bell now and could have a very good OL, I'm a little gun shy because of all the injuries last year
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old -24-05-2008
Ramblin` Ram's Avatar
Ramblin` Ram
Status: Offline
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Age: 32
Posts: 533
Rep Power: 6
Ramblin` Ram is just really niceRamblin` Ram is just really niceRamblin` Ram is just really niceRamblin` Ram is just really nice
Re: Which Personnel Move (or Non-move) Cause You The Greatest Concern?

i voted not upgrading the SS spot over Chavous...i do think Johnson and bassey have an outside chance of taking his starting spot,but it is a position that we really can be exposed by the top teams at and will when we play them!

our linebacker corp could be ripped to shreads should Will go down also...
__________________
"A fanatic is one who can`t change his mind and won`t change the subject."

Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill


Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jim Thomas Live, Jan 4th RamWraith RAM TALK 0 -05-01-2008 02:34 PM
Rams set to rival, relive Greatest Show on Turf days RamWraith RAM TALK 11 -09-05-2007 11:33 PM
Rams set to rival, relive Greatest Show on Turf days RamWraith RAM TALK 7 -20-03-2007 02:59 PM
Rams ponder retooling personnel division RamWraith RAM TALK 25 -05-05-2006 03:33 AM
Fellow fan believes we have some real problems RamWraith RAM TALK 8 -17-02-2006 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.com