View Poll Results: If today's Sam Bradford were plugged into the GSOT...
- Voters
- 34. You may not vote on this poll
-
The result would have been the same.
5 14.71% -
His numbers would not have been as gaudy as Warner's, but the result would have been similar.
14 41.18% -
The Rams' offense would have been good, but not dominant.
14 41.18% -
The Rams would have been an average offensive team.
1 2.94% -
The Rams would have remained below .500.
0 0%
Results 16 to 21 of 21
-
-11-01-2012 #16
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 965
- Rep Power
- 2
-
-11-01-2012 #17
Re: Rams "Elseworlds" Poll: Bradford and the GSOT
Tough question!
I think if you took "today's" Bradford and instantly plugged him in to the GSOT......I think he would struggle at first. I really think it would take him time to grasp the offense. I'm not sure how long he would struggle but I do imagine him struggling.
I would eventually expect the 3rd option.

-
-11-02-2012 #18
Re: Rams "Elseworlds" Poll: Bradford and the GSOT
I'll answer that question by asking this one.
Would we be a better offense today, if Kurt Warner was our QB? For me it's a resounding yes, therefore I chose option 3.
-
-11-02-2012 #19
-
-11-02-2012 #20
Re: Rams "Elseworlds" Poll: Bradford and the GSOT
I voted for #2. I don't think Sam's numbers would have been as good as Warner's, but I do think the results would have been similar.
One thing that immediately popped into my mind when thinking about this question was the sack percentages - the percentage of time the quarterback is sacked when attempting to pass.
During Warner's GSOT days, his combined sack percentage from 1999-2001 was 5.8%. Bradford's career sack percentage is 7.2%. When factoring in only the last two years specifically, it's a whopping 8.9%.
When Kurt was still in St. Louis and had a sack percentage above 8, the results weren't pretty. When Sam was a rookie, his sack percentage was down in the 5% range, and while I think his rookie season gets overrated slightly by fans, it was without a doubt a very promising rookie year that nearly got the Rams into the playoffs.
With protection, Bradford can perform at a high level. Combine that type of protection with the weapons and scheme of the GSOT, and I think Sam could have been very successful in that scenario.Last edited by Nick; -11-02-2012 at 05:29 PM.
-
-11-03-2012 #21
Re: Rams "Elseworlds" Poll: Bradford and the GSOT
Kurt had heart those rumbles with Saints were brutal. Plus Kurt would throw where receivers were going. Timing was critical. The offense was always moving and with Faulk coming out of the backfield Bradford would have to not only have accuracy but vision. I went with option 3 I dont think the results would have been same even though the offense would be good AND dominant... remember GSOT also had a lot to do with Faulk. I wish there would have been an option in between B and C.
Similar Threads
-
What Will Happen First In 2011? (A "Rep Point" Poll)
By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 29Last Post: -09-20-2011, 03:15 PM -
Rams and Bradford agree to "numbers and terms"
By RockinRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 9Last Post: -07-30-2010, 09:27 PM -
Sam Bradford is the true "Wild Card" for the Rams first choice.
By AvengerRam in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 48Last Post: -02-08-2010, 04:22 PM -
Rams Report Card: "C's" and "D's" result in an "L"
By Nick in forum RAM TALKReplies: 2Last Post: -11-14-2005, 06:31 AM




2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


RAMMER
Bookmarks