Results 16 to 26 of 26
-
-12-17-2012 #16
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
No offense taken. I do agree that the Rams should not enter into a deal that puts a big cap number on SJax beyond 2013. I do think, however, he has another good year in him.
Certainly an option. I think there are some good prospects who will be there in those rounds (LeVeon Bell is at the top of my list).I'd much rather draft a guy in rounds 3 or 4 and pair him with Richardson and pead rather than spend the money to keep Jackson.Last edited by AvengerRam; -12-17-2012 at 09:49 PM.
Welcome to the St. Louis Rams!
-
-12-17-2012 #17
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
[/QUOTE]
fans are way too quick to label good solid players as busts just because they haven't fulfilled their expectations. Especially in their first or 2nd years. It takes many players until years 3-5 to contribute and this includes high draft picks.
Kendricks will likely end up with 40 catches this year and he's always been a very solid blocker. The league isn't filled with Gronks and Tony Gonzalez's. Kendricks has the potential to end up a good tight end but, like you, I don't see the game changing receiving ability. Now both Ertz and Eifert possess that. especially Eifert imo, yes Ertz may be the better statistical athletem but Eifert is just a far more fluid route runner, pass catcher and is a great athlete/huge as well.
-
-12-17-2012 #18
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
Who said he's a bust?
Welcome to the St. Louis Rams!
-
-12-18-2012 #19
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
fans are way too quick to label good solid players as busts just because they haven't fulfilled their expectations. Especially in their first or 2nd years. It takes many players until years 3-5 to contribute and this includes high draft picks.
Kendricks will likely end up with 40 catches this year and he's always been a very solid blocker. The league isn't filled with Gronks and Tony Gonzalez's. Kendricks has the potential to end up a good tight end but, like you, I don't see the game changing receiving ability. Now both Ertz and Eifert possess that. especially Eifert imo, yes Ertz may be the better statistical athletem but Eifert is just a far more fluid route runner, pass catcher and is a great athlete/huge as well.
To be fair, Kendricks isn't being asked to do what Gonzalez and Gronk are asked to do. For the Rams FO to feel comfortable enough ditching our only FB on the roster in favor of Kendricks, that to me says he's doing an admirable job in his role.
I agree with you that Matthew Mulligan won't cut it for our receiving tight end role though. I'm intrigued by Ertz and Eifert.
-
-12-18-2012 #20
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
Moss has 23 receptions for 362 yards this year. I don't know about you, but if we sign a free agent and get that type of production out of him, I'd be pretty pissed off at the front office.but we may need a stop gap(Think Moss in Whinerland this year).Clannie Nominee for ClanRam's Thickest Poster
-
-12-18-2012 #21
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- new jersey
- Posts
- 1,805
- Rep Power
- 60
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
I'm generally in agreement with the originally posted list. I completely DISAGREE with any suggestion we should entertain the idea of drafting yet another TE in the early rounds. Why?? First off, Kendricks has improved, and I still believe the guy will be a good pro. Those waiting for the next incarnation of Tony Gonzalez, however, might be disappointed. Plus, there are other, more pressing needs this team has than the Tight End position. A big-time receiver, two quality safeties, a good linebacker and yes, the offensive line again- not necessarily in that order- are the areas where we need to focus our attention.
-
-12-18-2012 #22
-
-12-18-2012 #23
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
As a UCLA fan, I love Fauria... but I don't know how I feel about him for the Rams. I feel like he could be a Kendricks clone, which is not necessarily a problem, but it doesn't give us different dynamic weapons. I'd be more in favor in an oversized receiver than one who can be an inline blocker.
EDIT: That's not to say that I don't want a TE who can block. I want one who is a better receiver, whereas Kendicks has so far shown himself to be balanced or slightly better blocking than receiving. Any good basketball players looking to convert?Last edited by TekeRam; -12-18-2012 at 11:03 PM.
I believe!
-
-12-19-2012 #24
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 969
- Rep Power
- 2
Re: Rams' Starters Fall Into 3 Groups
i'd go with ertz, made some good catches for stanford, and helped anchor a very good offensive line
-
-12-19-2012 #25
-
-12-19-2012 #26
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 969
- Rep Power
- 2
Similar Threads
-
Here are the Rams’ starters — for starters ..
By MauiRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 17Last Post: -05-24-2010, 01:40 AM -
Rams Starters Were Shoved Around
By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALKReplies: 13Last Post: -08-26-2009, 10:57 AM -
Four Jet starters out vs Rams
By Azul e Oro in forum RAM TALKReplies: 4Last Post: -08-12-2009, 10:50 AM -
Which starters should be back as starters next year?
By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 21Last Post: -11-17-2005, 11:39 PM




8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks