Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    ramsbruce's Avatar
    ramsbruce is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    FIRING SCHOTTY
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,795
    Rep Power
    52

    Rams | Vitt - Faulk does not need bigger role

    Rams | Vitt - Faulk does not need bigger role
    Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:24:29 -0800

    R. B. Fallstrom, of the Associated Press, reports St. Louis Rams interim head coach Joe Vitt was asked if he felt RB Marshall Faulk needed to have a greater role in the offense for the Rams to succeed. He answered, "No, I don't."

    Quote Originally Posted by ramsbruce
    Some of the excuses made for Jared Cook are laughable.

  2. #2
    RamJackson39 Guest

    Re: Rams | Vitt - Faulk does not need bigger role

    wrong answer! Faulk definately needs a larger role. He almost has no role in the offense right now. He needs at least 5-10 carries a game. It would be great change up.

  3. #3
    talkstoangels61 Guest

    Re: Rams | Vitt - Faulk does not need bigger role

    Yep....He's blind and i really dont care to keep him around if he thinks like this!...........a player of Marshall's caliber just doesnt lose it overnight!............Vitt take off your blinders

  4. #4
    psycho9985 Guest

    Re: Rams | Vitt - Faulk does not need bigger role

    I cant understand why we keep Marshall if all he gets is 5 touches at the most.A warrior like Faulk needs to play 30 min. a game I know he can handle it

    It could be that he will take Wilburt Montgomery's job in the near future.







    Image





    Back to

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •