All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.
Home Contact us FAQ

ClanRam
2008 Schedule
Regular Season
9/7 Eagles L 3 - 38
9/14 Giants L 13-41
9/21 Seahawks L 13-37
9/28 Bills L 14-31
10/5
BYE
 
10/12 Redskins W 19-17
10/19 Cowboys W 34-14
10/26 Patriots L 16-23
11/10 Cardinals L 13-34
11/10 Jets L 3-47
11/16 Whiners L 16-35
11/23 Bears L 3-27
11/30 Dolphins L 12-16
12/7 Cardinals - 3:15pm
12/14 Seahawks - Noon
12/21 Whiners - Noon
12/28 Falcons - Noon
All times Central
Score in italics: Overtime

Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2008 SEASON > RAM TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -07-05-2007
RamWraith's Avatar
RamWraith
Status: Online
Pinball Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minnesota
Age: 38
Posts: 8,175
Rep Power: 42
RamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond reputeRamWraith has a reputation beyond repute
Rating the Rams: Defensive line

By Steve Reynolds

The St. Louis Rams ' 2006 defensive line was the flash point for the team's season-long aversion to defense and is the culprit most directly responsible for the unit's two greatest weaknesses: stopping the run and putting pressure (or in this case lack thereof) on the quarterback.

The Rams' line saw nearly a complete overhaul in the '06 season, losing tackles Damione Lewis and Ryan Pickett to free agency and mislaying end Anthony Hargrove because he was otherwise engaged at drama camp (demoted and traded for missing practice and refusing to give an explanation).

St. Louis' defense not only gave up the second-most rushing yards in the league last year, the unit also allowed a maddening amount of big plays from NFL rushing juggernauts such as Green Bay's Noah Herron and Seattle's Maurice Morris.

In the same mold, the D-line was utterly ineffectual (with a lone exception) pressuring the opposing quarterback. Disguising coverages and sending blitzing LBs and DBs should be a normal part of defensive coordinator Jim Haslett's scheme, not a necessity due to the front four being nullified every passing down. QBs had all day to throw against the Rams; and given time like that, even Eli Manning will burn you.

Let us grade the starting defenders along the Rams' defensive line from this past season:

Leonard Little, DE; Height: 6-3, Weight: 263; Age: 32

The stalwart Little was the lone consistent bright spot for the Rams' D-line. Little added 13 sacks, also singlehandedly preserving the team's win at Green Bay and giving the Rams a chance to beat Seattle in a game they had, at that point, given away. Little proved that he is the type of defender who can change the outcome of a game (a rarity in today's NFL) and was rewarded with a contract extension. For a "small" lineman Little plays the run surprisingly well, although he occasionally gets erased when large blockers can get their hooks in.

Stopping the run: B
Rushing the passer: A
Prognosis for 2007 should be: Starting LE

Jimmy Kennedy, NT; Height: 6-4, Weight: 325; Age: 27

The lone first-round draft pick remaining on the line, more due to contract length than winning the battle of attrition, Kennedy was given the chance to start at nose tackle to see if he was the future. In a word, no.

In three words, not even close.

Kennedy played in every game for the Rams last season. However, you wouldn't know it because the announcers seldom, if ever, called his name. Seemingly the latest bust in a long line of DT choices, Kennedy is entering his contract year, and if he ever had anything to prove, the time is next season. Don't hold your breath, Rams fans; it's time to put the Jimmy Kennedy Experiment on hiatus.

Stopping the run: D-
Rushing the passer: F
Prognosis for 2007 should be: Best-case scenario, backup DT seeing occasional time in rotation.

La'Roi Glover, DT; Height 6-2, Weight 290; Age: 33 next season

Let's face it, Glover is not the player he was in New Orleans, and the Rams (over)paid him as if he were. However, the DT is still the player he was in Dallas, which his numbers reflect. Glover flourished in New Orleans and Dallas because he was surrounded by talented players, and the onus was not put upon him to do it all. However, on a Rams team that merely masqueraded as a defense, Glover was simply part of the problem. Glover is too old to shoulder the burden of being the prominent run stopper on the line, but not so old that he cannot be a good, or even excellent, complementary player. His future will parallel what the Rams do in the offseason.

Stopping the run: D
Rushing the passer: C
Prognosis for 2007 should be: Whether he is a starter is immaterial; he should play little more than half the snaps per game.

Victor Adeyanju, DE; Height: 6-4, Weight: 270; Age: 24

For a player who's supposed strength is stopping the run, Adeyanju didn't make a noticeable impact overall in the porous Rams run defense. Adeyanju played reasonably well for a rookie, but the Rams need much more help than what he will bring to the table; and the DE is a major liability in pass-rushing situations. However, Adeyanju showed ability in his first year and will be given time to develop.

Stopping the run: D
Rushing the passer: F
Prognosis for 2007 should be: Should not start, but he ought to see a lot of time in rotation.

The Rams must spend their free agent dollars on the defensive line this offseason. The draft may provide assistance long term, but this team needs help now and can't afford to blow yet another high-round pick on an ineffective DT. The Rams have to fork out the dough this year in free agency to acquire a proven DE to play opposite Little, as well as procuring one, if not two, quality defensive tackle(s).

Otherwise, the only thing the Rams will stuff next year is their shot at the playoffs
__________________

"I would much rather have a bottle in front of me than a
frontal lobotomy"!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -07-05-2007
TNRamFan23's Avatar
TNRamFan23
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 0
TNRamFan23 - is moving towards the light
Re: Rating the Rams: Defensive line

Good read, Thanks !
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -08-05-2007
Goldenfleece's Avatar
Goldenfleece
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: D.C. Suburbs
Age: 27
Posts: 2,010
Rep Power: 21
Goldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud of
Re: Rating the Rams: Defensive line

Interesting. That may be the first time I've ever heard Little described as a good run stopper. Still, it comes as no surprise that he'd be the only starting DL who would get good marks for last year. Even after trading for a defensive end and addressing the defensive line in the first, fifth, and seventh rounds it still feels like we haven't done enough.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old -08-05-2007
tomahawk247's Avatar
tomahawk247
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Billericay, Essex, England
Age: 22
Posts: 1,792
Rep Power: 8
tomahawk247 is just really nicetomahawk247 is just really nicetomahawk247 is just really nicetomahawk247 is just really nicetomahawk247 is just really nice
Re: Rating the Rams: Defensive line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenfleece View Post
Interesting. That may be the first time I've ever heard Little described as a good run stopper. Still, it comes as no surprise that he'd be the only starting DL who would get good marks for last year. Even after trading for a defensive end and addressing the defensive line in the first, fifth, and seventh rounds it still feels like we haven't done enough.
Little's abilities as a run stopper come from nothing more then being able to get in the backfield quickly to disrupt the play. He is a solid tackler and fast in pursuit as well, but he plays in the opponants backfield, which is what you want to do when trying to stop the run.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -08-05-2007
laram0's Avatar
laram0
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 51
Posts: 5,520
Rep Power: 31
laram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rating the Rams: Defensive line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenfleece View Post
Interesting. That may be the first time I've ever heard Little described as a good run stopper. Still, it comes as no surprise that he'd be the only starting DL who would get good marks for last year. Even after trading for a defensive end and addressing the defensive line in the first, fifth, and seventh rounds it still feels like we haven't done enough.
I know what you mean. Other than Little every D-lineman has question marks. Only time will tell. Haslett has alot of tools to work with. Hopefully he can get it done with this cast.
__________________
GO RAMS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RamView, 12/31/2006: Rams 41, Vikings 21 (Long) MFranke RAM TALK 2 -02-01-2007 07:07 PM
RamView, 11/12/2006: Seahawks 24, Rams 22 (Long) MFranke RAM TALK 2 -13-11-2006 09:04 PM
Rams History OldRamsfan RAM TALK 6 -08-02-2006 08:36 AM
RamView, 10/2/2005: Giants 44, Rams 24 (Long) MFranke RAM TALK 0 -03-10-2005 01:51 PM
Rams Brain Trust Faces Early Test RamDez RAM TALK 0 -19-02-2005 09:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.com