All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 AM.
Home Contact us FAQ

ClanRam
2008 Schedule
Regular Season
9/7 Eagles L 3 - 38
9/14 Giants L 13-41
9/21 Seahawks L 13-37
9/28 Bills L 14-31
10/5
BYE
 
10/12 Redskins W 19-17
10/19 Cowboys W 34-14
10/26 Patriots L 16-23
11/10 Cardinals L 13-34
11/10 Jets L 3-47
11/16 Whiners L 16-35
11/23 Bears L 3-27
11/30 Dolphins L 12-16
12/7 Cardinals - 3:15pm
12/14 Seahawks - Noon
12/21 Whiners - Noon
12/28 Falcons - Noon
All times Central
Score in italics: Overtime

Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2008 SEASON > RAM TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
AvengerRam's Avatar
AvengerRam
Status: Online
Mild Mannered Mod
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,528
Rep Power: 45
AvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond repute
Rating the Rams' Depth

I'll give each category a rating of Solid (can absorb injuries; dropoff not excessive), Suspect (depth has potential, but is unproven), or Thin (starters better stay healthy).

QB - SOLID
There would be clear dropoff from Bulger to Green, but it would not be excessive (provided Green himself could then stay healthy).

RB - THIN
Can't afford to lose Jackson. Pittman and Leonard wouldn't scare anyone.

WR - SUSPECT
We don't know what we have in Avery and Burton. My hope is that they are future starters, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.

TE - SOLID
If there's one thing Linehan knows how to do, its collect TEs.

OT - SUSPECT
It all depends on how ready Greco is to play.

C/OG - SOLID
The Rams have accumulated decent depth in the interior line, particularly compared to last year.

DE - THIN
Little and Long need to stay healthy to keep the pass rush going.

DT - SUSPECT
With Wroten gone, its currently a three-player rotation of Glover, Ryan and Carriker. Carriker's flexibility is a great value, but who will be behind these three?

LB - THIN
The Rams are four deep at LB at this point. That's a bit scary.

CB - SOLID
Brown, Hill, Bartell, Wade, Macklin, King - not a huge difference from top to bottom.

S - THIN
Can't afford to lose Chavous or Atogwe, particularly Atogwe.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
Fortuninerhater's Avatar
Fortuninerhater
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A., Ca.
Posts: 776
Rep Power: 8
Fortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of lightFortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of lightFortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of lightFortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of lightFortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of lightFortuninerhater is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvengerRam View Post
I'll give each category a rating of Solid (can absorb injuries; dropoff not excessive), Suspect (depth has potential, but is unproven), or Thin (starters better stay healthy).

QB - SOLID
There would be clear dropoff from Bulger to Green, but it would not be excessive (provided Green himself could then stay healthy).

RB - THIN
Can't afford to lose Jackson. Pittman and Leonard wouldn't scare anyone.

WR - SUSPECT
We don't know what we have in Avery and Burton. My hope is that they are future starters, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.

TE - SOLID
If there's one thing Linehan knows how to do, its collect TEs.

OT - SUSPECT
It all depends on how ready Greco is to play.

C/OG - SOLID
The Rams have accumulated decent depth in the interior line, particularly compared to last year.

DE - THIN
Little and Long need to stay healthy to keep the pass rush going.

DT - SUSPECT
With Wroten gone, its currently a three-player rotation of Glover, Ryan and Carriker. Carriker's flexibility is a great value, but who will be behind these three?

LB - THIN
The Rams are four deep at LB at this point. That's a bit scary.

CB - SOLID
Brown, Hill, Bartell, Wade, Macklin, King - not a huge difference from top to bottom.

S - THIN
Can't afford to lose Chavous or Atogwe, particularly Atogwe.


Agree with most of your assessment. One thing though, at Safety, I don't believe we'd miss Chavous much no matter who steps into his spot. In fact, they may even prove to be an upgrade.

And at RB, you'd think we'd be solid there having spent a 2nd round pick on Leonard just last year. What a waste that pick still is.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
chipperjones's Avatar
chipperjones
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 550
Rep Power: 4
chipperjones has a spectacular aura aboutchipperjones has a spectacular aura about
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvengerRam View Post
I'll give each category a rating of Solid (can absorb injuries; dropoff not excessive), Suspect (depth has potential, but is unproven), or Thin (starters better stay healthy).

QB - SOLID
There would be clear dropoff from Bulger to Green, but it would not be excessive (provided Green himself could then stay healthy).

RB - THIN
Can't afford to lose Jackson. Pittman and Leonard wouldn't scare anyone.

WR - SUSPECT
We don't know what we have in Avery and Burton. My hope is that they are future starters, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.

TE - SOLID
If there's one thing Linehan knows how to do, its collect TEs.

OT - SUSPECT
It all depends on how ready Greco is to play.

C/OG - SOLID
The Rams have accumulated decent depth in the interior line, particularly compared to last year.

DE - THIN
Little and Long need to stay healthy to keep the pass rush going.

DT - SUSPECT
With Wroten gone, its currently a three-player rotation of Glover, Ryan and Carriker. Carriker's flexibility is a great value, but who will be behind these three?

LB - THIN
The Rams are four deep at LB at this point. That's a bit scary.

CB - SOLID
Brown, Hill, Bartell, Wade, Macklin, King - not a huge difference from top to bottom.

S - THIN
Can't afford to lose Chavous or Atogwe, particularly Atogwe.

Pretty good, but IMO DE is solid in depth. James Hall and Victor Adeyanju are very good backups.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
Wolf's Avatar
Wolf
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 152
Rep Power: 2
Wolf - will become famous soon enough
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

yeah, our pass rush isn't that bad. Hall is aging, but the fact he'll be fresh in a rotation on the end spot from time to time could help us.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
RealRam's Avatar
RealRam
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 4,613
Rep Power: 25
RealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud ofRealRam has much to be proud of
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chipperjones View Post
Pretty good, but IMO DE is solid in depth. James Hall and Victor Adeyanju are very good backups.
'Probably right, CJ. With AVs category ratings, we should be at least 'Suspect' for DE. I agree in that Hall is a good backup; hopefully Adeyanju grows into the position this year.
__________________
RealRam

If you have integrity, nothing else matters.
If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters.
-Unknown

_______________________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
moloch41's Avatar
moloch41
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,503
Rep Power: 14
moloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud ofmoloch41 has much to be proud of
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

I disagree with CB- I'd say thin. If we lose Brown to another suspension (which will be a year like fatboy Wroten), we are in trouble. Hill is still trying to prove that he was worth a #1, Wade looked awful at points last year, King has never played a down and was a project pick at best, Macklin has been an average player throughout his career, and Ron Bartell has only shown flashes.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
Josh's Avatar
Josh
Status: Offline
Made the Ram Roster (just)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 0
Josh - will become famous soon enoughJosh - will become famous soon enough
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

with the addition of Kreider as the Led Full Back.. I might consider Our depth at runningback to be Solid.. sure dan Is a fullback, But He could help on goalline Situations, Because you all know the trouble we seem to have punching it in even with S-JAX inside the 5
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
laram0's Avatar
laram0
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 51
Posts: 5,520
Rep Power: 31
laram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond reputelaram0 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh View Post
with the addition of Kreider as the Led Full Back.. I might consider Our depth at runningback to be Solid.. sure dan Is a fullback, But He could help on goalline Situations, Because you all know the trouble we seem to have punching it in even with S-JAX inside the 5
I'm not ready to give up on Brian Leonard yet. He's no Steven Jackson but I think he's going to turn into a different type of weapon that will be solid.
__________________
GO RAMS
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
VegasRam's Avatar
VegasRam
Status: Online
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 60
Posts: 565
Rep Power: 10
VegasRam is a splendid one to beholdVegasRam is a splendid one to beholdVegasRam is a splendid one to beholdVegasRam is a splendid one to beholdVegasRam is a splendid one to beholdVegasRam is a splendid one to behold
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Might be wishful thinking, but between McGarigle, Vobra, Magro and Chamberlain, I think we'll end up better than 4 deep at LB.

I also think it's kind of funny how Chillar's all of a sudden a superstar now that he's gone. Dude was OK at best, and basically just adequate.

I also think between Bartell, Johnson and even Bassey, we're not all that thin at Safety
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old -24-07-2008
39thebeast's Avatar
39thebeast
Status: Online
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: conecticut
Posts: 1,011
Rep Power: 6
39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice39thebeast is just really nice
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

I would say DE and S are more suspect than thin. Tod Johnson is an ok back up at SS and Jerome isn't too bad. Bartell and Bassey also can provide something at FS. Vic is a good run stopper and he if he could rush the passer a little he'd be better. A healthy Hall not taking alot of snaps also isn't half bad
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old -25-07-2008
RamsInfiniti's Avatar
RamsInfiniti
Status: Online
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: alabama
Age: 29
Posts: 998
Rep Power: 20
RamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant futureRamsInfiniti has a brilliant future
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvengerRam View Post
I'll give each category a rating of Solid (can absorb injuries; dropoff not excessive), Suspect (depth has potential, but is unproven), or Thin (starters better stay healthy).

QB - SOLID
There would be clear dropoff from Bulger to Green, but it would not be excessive (provided Green himself could then stay healthy).

RB - THIN
Can't afford to lose Jackson. Pittman and Leonard wouldn't scare anyone.

WR - SUSPECT
We don't know what we have in Avery and Burton. My hope is that they are future starters, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.

TE - SOLID
If there's one thing Linehan knows how to do, its collect TEs.

OT - SUSPECT
It all depends on how ready Greco is to play.

C/OG - SOLID
The Rams have accumulated decent depth in the interior line, particularly compared to last year.

DE - THIN
Little and Long need to stay healthy to keep the pass rush going.

DT - SUSPECT
With Wroten gone, its currently a three-player rotation of Glover, Ryan and Carriker. Carriker's flexibility is a great value, but who will be behind these three?

LB - THIN
The Rams are four deep at LB at this point. That's a bit scary.

CB - SOLID
Brown, Hill, Bartell, Wade, Macklin, King - not a huge difference from top to bottom.

S - THIN
Can't afford to lose Chavous or Atogwe, particularly Atogwe.
I like the analysis, but I'll add my opinion, for those who care and those who dont:

I don't think we are as thin at running back as one might think. Yea, you are right: Leonard and Pittman are not world beaters. However, they are likely improved over last season and Leonard did get a 100 yard game under his belt last year. These guys could likely hold their own for a few games if Jackson went down. Especially with the structure of this offense, I think Al could go to a very effective short passing game if it were required ...

DE is thin by no means, suspect at worst, especially if Little is healthy, Hall is a very capable backup who led this team in QB pressures and hits last year, while playing very effective against the run. Adeyanju is a proven run stopped in limited action and apparently is most improved out of the whole bunch....

We are also not that thin at LB. How many teams in this league have six capable linebackers? I doubt you'd find many. McGarigle looked very solid in the preseason last year. If him and Culberson develop, this is a very solid group, if Pisa can stay healthy. If we are basing this on Pisa's tendencies to get hurt, it may be a little suspect. The sad thing about Pisa is, he looked very solid when he was on the field last year ...

Safety is a dangerous spot. If one guy goes down, we could be in a world of hurt. Despite this, Johnson is a capable player: he was a full time started his rookie year and talking to Bear's fans, he was excellent against the run. Time will tell if our juggernaut of energy Eric Bassey can be productive here. Wonder was Carter can do?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old -25-07-2008
Bar-bq's Avatar
Bar-bq
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,546
Rep Power: 20
Bar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant futureBar-bq has a brilliant future
Re: Rating the Rams' Depth

I agree with Av's assessment of the D-Line. Little and Long pose to be the primary pass-rush threats along the line. If one of them goes down, what do we do? Adeyanju excels against the run, as does Hall- but who rushes the passer? Do we move Spoon to DE again? Can it work now teams have seen it?

Sounds rather thin to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jim Thomas Live RamWraith RAM TALK 5 1 Week Ago 01:57 AM
Jim Thomas Live-Feb. 5th RamWraith RAM TALK 2 -06-02-2008 05:24 PM
J. Thomas Live, 12-27 RamWraith RAM TALK 1 -28-12-2007 04:46 PM
Jim Thomas Live Tuesday, November 27 (LONG) RamWraith RAM TALK 1 -28-11-2007 12:57 AM
Postgame With Gordo: November 25 RamWraith RAM TALK 1 -26-11-2007 03:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.com