Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
-
-09-26-2011 #1
Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
Power rankings: Rams NFL's worst team?
By Mike Sando
The Seattle Seahawks ranked last in ESPN's most recent NFL power rankings.
Should another team from the NFC West replace them at No. 32? Five things to consider regarding the St. Louis Rams:
- The Rams, like the Kansas City Chiefs, have yet to run an offensive play this season while leading their opponent. Seattle and Miami had not before Sunday.
- Each of the Rams' three opponents this season has returned a Sam Bradford fumble for a touchdown. The Rams' offense has only three touchdowns. Discouraging math there.
- Steven Jackson still isn't ready to contribute fully. He was active Sunday, but played sparingly and made no difference.
- The Rams have not yet scored in a fourth quarter this season.
- For all their problems on offense, the Rams have allowed more rushing yards than any team in the league. They rank 31st in yards allowed per carry. They are 31st in point differential per game, ahead of only the Chiefs. But the Chiefs were competitive in defeat Sunday, losing 20-17 at San Diego.
Where would you rank the Rams? Which teams are worse?
-
-09-26-2011 #2
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
"...For all their problems on offense, the Rams have allowed more rushing yards than any team in the league. They rank 31st in yards allowed per carry. They are 31st in point differential per game, ahead of only the Chiefs. But the Chiefs were competitive in defeat Sunday, losing 20-17 at San Diego...."
All I have to say is this
Nd Suh > Bradford (rushing yard cure)
Colt Mcoy > Bradford (Qb cure)
MOher > JSmith (Im glad we like to look for potential in a #1 pick, rather than rock solid playing performance)
Pettis/Salas/Kendrick in rounds 2-3-4 = more contribute to lack of offense as well.
Rams have needed help since Vermiel 'stepped down' to go coach the Chiefs.
-
-09-26-2011 #3
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
There's no way I would take McCoy over Bradford. Not then and not now. As far as taking Bradford over Suh, We had to do it. Our franchise was in dire need of a Superstar QB and he will be just that.

-
-09-26-2011 #4
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
Sadly, very familiar territory and landscape I assumed we would never see this year. Tough to talk about woulda and couldas since w ehave who we have. I am very interested to see what transpires with Coaching staff/GM given new ownership. This is all on current regime. Poor tacking, no heart, penalties galore just horrible execution from this team.
-
-09-26-2011 #5
-
-09-26-2011 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Posts
- 35
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
Myopic nonsense to say Colt/Bulger are better than Bradford.
Myopic and stupid, anyway.
-
-09-26-2011 #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Toronto
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 202
- Rep Power
- 8
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
Bulger was definitely worse (esp for the longer run), but his problems then stemmed from the same ones Sam faces now. Namely an O line that gives him a window of about a second to throw and receivers who either can't consistently catch, get downfield or find separation.
It's like sticking a blu ray disc into a VHS player. Until we upgrade everything around him, Sam's development will suffer, as will this team. Feel for him, as I did for Bulger (who was made to look a lot worse than he really was).
-
-09-26-2011 #8
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
No we are not the worst team in the league. And no I would not take Suh and McCoy over Bradford and Saffold, thats just being plain stupid.
-
-09-26-2011 #9
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Maui, Hi.
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 4,021
- Rep Power
- 69
-
-09-26-2011 #10
-
-09-26-2011 #11
-
-09-26-2011 #12
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
It's amazing how quick people are turning their backs on Sam "Superbowl" Bradford.
I remember when we finally beat the seahags, and niners, and cardinals and how people were rejoicing and saying that Bradford was in the top 10 best in the league.
Before ya'll say bradford sucks, remember the first 5 games of last year with clayton. You give bradford a receiver, and it doesn't have to be Jerry Rice, and he would be unstoppable. Peyton Manning won 4 games in 2 years i believe, so be patient.
As much as i would've loved suh, like we said last year. only thing suh would've done was change the score from 52-3 to 32-6. We needed Bradford and now we got him, HE NEEDS SOME FREAKIN RECEIVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The year is rough so far. Playing the Eagles with a super fresh Micheal Vick and without SJ is hard. Playing the Giants at home on monday night without SJ is hard. Playing against a pissed off Ravens team is probably the hardest thing anyone can do.
Relax guys. Sooner or later they coaches will unleash the beast known as bradford and before you know it, we will be The Greatest Show on Turf Version 2
-
-09-26-2011 #13
-
-09-26-2011 #14
Re: Sando: Rams NFL's worst team?
Similar Threads
-
Rams Not the Worst Team in the NFL?
By Bralidore(RAMMODE) in forum RAM TALKReplies: 9Last Post: -06-08-2010, 07:28 PM -
NFL's Only Triple A Team...
By Chiledog in forum RAM TALKReplies: 12Last Post: -09-10-2008, 03:08 PM -
The worst Rams team ever ...
By RamsInfiniti in forum RAM TALKReplies: 15Last Post: -09-30-2007, 06:41 PM -
Rams are the worst Run Defense team EVER
By Tony Soprano in forum RAM TALKReplies: 5Last Post: -12-06-2005, 07:25 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks