View Poll Results: WHO'S SIDE ARE YOU ON?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • ST. LOUIS RAMS

    44 78.57%
  • STEVEN JACKSON

    12 21.43%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29
  1. #16
    Goldenfleece's Avatar
    Goldenfleece is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,586
    Rep Power
    60

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    I'm on the Rams side but not versus Jackson, versus the agent. The Rams made a substantial offer and professed a willingness to continue negotiations during camp. IMO, that should have been enough to avoid the holdout. The team didn't franchise Jackson. They didn't low ball him, and they didn't say that was their final offer. Eugene Parker, the agent, is the one who broke off negotiations by deciding Jackson should hold out.


  2. #17
    RealRam's Avatar
    RealRam is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8,224
    Rep Power
    68

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Interesting poll L.A.

    After I voted for the Rams I was surprised to see the strong support here in that direction.

    I wonder, however, does that 'clause', i.e., requiring Jackson's presence at training camp in order to negotiate, still stand? Or have both sides moved on to a different, conditional give-and-take posture?

    Something so simple yet so complicated!
    Last edited by RealRam; -08-15-2008 at 06:06 PM. Reason: Icon

  3. #18
    eldfan's Avatar
    eldfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Greenville N.C.
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,655
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    I don't understand why he would walk out on the negotitation when the rams was making offers. One I heard was about 7.5 million a year with a 18 mill bonus. I understand to get things moving. I wounder to why management would paint themselves in a coner by saying negotitations would not continued untill he returns. But to answer the question I am with management.
    :ramlogo:

  4. #19
    jkramsfan's Avatar
    jkramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Destin,Fl.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,507
    Rep Power
    44

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Quote Originally Posted by Bar-bq View Post
    RAMS!

    No individual is bigger than the team itself.
    perfectly said,I am a hugh Jackson fan but he is turning alot of fans against him because this has he is not looking like the team player he claimed to be.

  5. #20
    thoey's Avatar
    thoey is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,017
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Quote Originally Posted by jkramsfan View Post
    perfectly said,I am a hugh Jackson fan but he is turning alot of fans against him because this has he is not looking like the team player he claimed to be.
    Wait, are we talking about Steven Jackson or Hugh Jackson

    This space for rent...

  6. #21
    theodus69's Avatar
    theodus69 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    so.cal.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,202
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Neither, They both disgust me @ this piont!!!!!!!!!!!
    I stopped going to the dentist.......I got tired of the cavity searches!

  7. #22
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,246
    Rep Power
    127

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Without a shred of any real evidence to prove "good faith" negotiations from either party, I certainly can't make a decision on who to side with. Way too many unknowns here.

  8. #23
    Mooselini's Avatar
    Mooselini is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,724
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    The Rams. I believe that they have the right to say that he needs to attend camp to get a deal. It makes sense. Rather than not showing up until he gets a deal.

    I believe that the Rams are doing the right thing. However, they should atleast tell him to show up JUST to negotiate. He doesn't need to parcipitate that day, but he can atleast get the deal he wants.

  9. #24
    Javaman is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    75
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    If we can't sign Jackson and he continues not to report(even tho he is under contract), should we bring Alexander in for at least a tryout?

  10. #25
    jkramsfan's Avatar
    jkramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Destin,Fl.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,507
    Rep Power
    44

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    I was for the Rams when this first started, but now it's time for them to step up and pay the man,did they not see the offense without him last weekend,the pissing contest needs to end,we need this guy,he is one of the 5 best players in the league and deserves to be paid, I don't like the way he has handled this, but I am sure there is alot to this we don't know.

  11. #26
    Ramer's Avatar
    Ramer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,026
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    I voted Rams! I would love to see Jackson on this team for many years, but players are getting out of control when it comes to their contracts. He should be in camp, he still has one year left on his current contract. What are players going to start signing long term contracts and hold out after the first year?

  12. #27
    ScottD413's Avatar
    ScottD413 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New York
    Age
    35
    Posts
    666
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    I'm on the Rams side here. Players should not have the right to hold teams ransom. If I got paid 7.5 million dollars a year I would do whatever was asked of me

  13. #28
    Frito's Avatar
    Frito is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    62
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    The Rams offered and told S. Jackson of their desire to negotiate a new contract before camp so that he wouldnt hold out. Their offer was fair epecially for a first offer he should have shown a good faith effort and taken a leadership role in my opinion. Guess thats the way of the world. I'm on the ownerships side on this one.

  14. #29
    moloch41's Avatar
    moloch41 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,617
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: ST. LOUIS RAMS vs STEVEN JACKSON

    Quote Originally Posted by Ramer View Post
    I voted Rams! I would love to see Jackson on this team for many years, but players are getting out of control when it comes to their contracts. He should be in camp, he still has one year left on his current contract. What are players going to start signing long term contracts and hold out after the first year?
    It's already happening. Terrell Owens did it with the Eagles. Urlacher did it after just a couple with the Bears. It's just a matter of time until every player starts holding out every year for a new deal. I wonder if they have a crappy year- if ownership can lock them out of camp and renegotiate...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Some of our Rams Historical Moments
    By OldRamsfan in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: -03-16-2009, 10:23 PM
  2. Jim Thomas Live
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -11-23-2008, 08:57 PM
  3. Jim Thomas Live: 4/15/08
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -04-15-2008, 07:35 PM
  4. Thomas' chat 9-4-07
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -09-04-2007, 07:52 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: -01-02-2007, 02:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •