Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44
  1. #16
    dgr828's Avatar
    dgr828 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    THE GOLDEN STATE
    Posts
    1,917
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by RamsFan16 View Post
    Are you kidding me? He had a few negative runs probrably two that were his fault. Be he fought, and fought, and fought some more to gain yards. He really played a good game today. Also picked up blitzs very well.
    If I want to see a fight, I'll watch the WWE's RAW or SMACKDOWN!

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  2. #17
    evil disco man's Avatar
    evil disco man is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Age
    29
    Posts
    2,024
    Rep Power
    55

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by dgr828 View Post
    About 40 of those yards gained late, during trash time, when the Broncos were done. Don't get me wrong, I like SJ, I guess I set my sites for the running game a little high.
    Most running backs that gain over 100 yards in a game get a good chunk of it during trash time, running the ball to eat up the clock, or mostly by only a few big runs. It's nothing out of the ordinary or to be worried about. Marc Bulger threw 38 times, but Steven still got his yards. I'll take that every Sunday.

  3. #18
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,233
    Rep Power
    127

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by dgr828 View Post
    About 40 of those yards gained late, during trash time, when the Broncos were done. Don't get me wrong, I like SJ, I guess I set my sites for the running game a little high.
    To have a running game, you have to have an offensive line, something we did not have today. Jackson fought and scratched to get those 121 yards, including the 40 you say the Denver defense just decided to give him. You like Jackson? You have a funny way of showing it. Bulger didn't have the greatest day statistically, should we go to Frerotte? Pace yourself dude, it's a sixteen game season.

  4. #19
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    31
    Posts
    19,299
    Rep Power
    153

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Disco Man View Post
    Marc Bulger threw 38 times, but Steven still got his yards. I'll take that every Sunday.
    I would even contend, as Ferter did, that the Rams should have run Jackson more. At the start of the second quarter after the Rams had forced their second turnover, Jackson ran once on a seven-play drive that started at the Denver 34 and ended with a field goal. Why we were passing the ball on 2nd down on Denver's two, I have no idea. The play calling was concerning at times today.
    ClanRam ModCast: Episode Two
    Rams Discussion Right at Your Fingertips!



  5. #20
    RealRam's Avatar
    RealRam is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8,216
    Rep Power
    68

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    To Jackson's defense, just imagine if Coach Linehan had decided to go for the [1st, yikes] Rams TD from the five or six yrd. line, right after Stephen's long gainer near the end of the game... and SJ Rams his way into the end zone!

    Eureka!! Euphoria!!

    That would have placed him on a much higher stand for today's results. As it is, he is among today's leading RBs with 121 yds. If sure would have been nice to see that TD next to his name Vs. Broncos.

    But our new HC played it super conservatively to end the game. That's okay too.

  6. #21
    mtmagpie's Avatar
    mtmagpie is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Age
    43
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    I cannot believe that some people still feel the need to complain! We beat the AFC WEST defending champion Denver Broncos by rushing and fierce defense! What more could a true Rams fan want? Sure we could score 37 points and lose, but I am much more interested in WINS! I know I am "new" here-but frankly, some of the posts I have read are pretty inane. Ir seems to me that some people here want to act like the so-called "analysts" in the sports media and pretend like they know what they are talking about. Get over it and enjoy the win!

    :l

  7. #22
    HOLT4MVP's Avatar
    HOLT4MVP is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    california
    Posts
    8
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by LaRamsFanLongTime View Post
    We played one of the best run stuffing defences in the NFL. A team that has tons of speed at lb and jackson had 121 yards. Im done with fickle fans enjoy the win.
    he had more yards then all of the denver rushing and they rush a whole lot hes goin to a prw bowl ok

  8. #23
    tanus is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    535
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by dgr828 View Post
    If I want to see a fight, I'll watch the WWE's RAW or SMACKDOWN!
    either you are just trying to ruffle some feathers or you are a complete moron. i'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time...

  9. #24
    LaRamsFanLongTime's Avatar
    LaRamsFanLongTime is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Foothill Ranch CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    808
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    If I want to see a fight, I'll watch the WWE's RAW or SMACKDOWN!
    Well I could see now what we are dealing with. Using WWE as an example of a fight? UFC is a fight. Anyways back to topic. This is Kurt warner Vs Marc Bulger all over again. People cannot get over the fact that Jackson replaced an injured and old Marshall. I came here expecting happy Ram fans that were excited about the game. Instead we have this crappy thread. This thread could have waited till tommorow. I mean everyone is entitled to his/hers opinion but the timing is terrible.
    Last edited by LaRamsFanLongTime; -09-10-2006 at 06:04 PM.
    LET'S GO DODGERS

  10. #25
    dgr828's Avatar
    dgr828 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    THE GOLDEN STATE
    Posts
    1,917
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by tanus View Post
    either you are just trying to ruffle some feathers or you are a complete moron. i'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time...
    Thank You, Very Much!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  11. #26
    LaRamsFanLongTime's Avatar
    LaRamsFanLongTime is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Foothill Ranch CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    808
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Your just pissed because your signature is not true DGR!! Right???
    LET'S GO DODGERS

  12. #27
    LaRamsFanLongTime's Avatar
    LaRamsFanLongTime is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Foothill Ranch CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    808
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    he had more yards then all of the denver rushing and they rush a whole lot hes goin to a prw bowl ok
    Actually he 121 Denver had 161 rushing yards. I will agree though that a Pro Bowl is possible, not a given, its a long season but hopefully he will be there.
    LET'S GO DODGERS

  13. #28
    dgr828's Avatar
    dgr828 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    THE GOLDEN STATE
    Posts
    1,917
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by LaRamsFanLongTime View Post
    Your just pissed because your signature is not true DGR!! Right???
    You might have a point there, longTime. I'm not Pissed, though! Life goes on, just hope our running game does the same! However; You must agree The RAMS are "Back in the mix for 2006".
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #29
    JackieSlater's Avatar
    JackieSlater is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Age
    42
    Posts
    667
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by dgr828 View Post
    I'm done with SJ, lets try SD!
    Not to fault Steven Jackson, but the RAMS must check their options at the runningback position.
    Sure, Jackson has his moments, but too many times the running game stalls with Jackson either being stuffed at the line, stopped in the backfield or some other misdirected blunder.
    The RAMS need more of a controlled running offensive. They need someone who can consistantly move the chains, keep the offense on a steady flow and set up the passing game.
    Maybe I'm overreacting, but sooner or later I would like to see what Stephen davis can do.
    I'm still holding out hope for Jackson, but my love of the RAMS ground game is 'RUNNING' on empty!
    Your fully entitled to your opinion, and i defend your right to that, HOWEVER i cant defend your views here?
    ??????? I stuggle to even try and grasp your point?

  15. #30
    jjigga3000's Avatar
    jjigga3000 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    1,393
    Rep Power
    16

    Re: Steven Jacksons' not the answer/Bring on Stephen Davis

    Quote Originally Posted by LaRamsFanLongTime View Post
    We played one of the best run stuffing defences in the NFL. A team that has tons of speed at lb and jackson had 121 yards. Im done with fickle fans enjoy the win.
    You Feel me?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •