Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By MACD
  • 1 Post By Ram Dragoon

Thread: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

  1. #1
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,224
    Rep Power
    127

    Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    Rams' backfield picture hazy without Jackson

    1 hour ago • By JIM THOMAS jthomas@post-dispatch.com 314-340-8197

    Just because Steven Jackson is a couple of weeks away from being an unrestricted free agent, that doesn’t mean he won’t be back in St. Louis. But what if that’s the case? What if he signs elsewhere once his contract is voided March 12, and the Rams’ backfield is without Jackson for the first time in a decade?

    The first thing that must be considered before the draft is what to make of their three rookies from 2012 — Daryl Richardson, Isaiah Pead and Terrance Ganaway.

    At the NFL scouting combine last Friday, coach Jeff Fisher said Pead was drafted not just to be a change-of-pace back spelling Jackson, but because the Rams thought he could be “the guy.” The feature back. Fisher said he felt Richardson could be an every-down back as well. That’s debatable given their size, with Pead at 5-10, 197 and Richardson at 5-10, 196.

    But the Rams obviously believe both players have potential to do a lot more than was the case in 2012.

    “Pead toward the end of the year, Daryl at the beginning and middle, proved they can play in the league ...” general manager Les Snead said. “They will all have a role. Richardson is going to have a role. Pead is going to have a role. They are all going to have a role and we are going to utilize those roles.”

    If that comes on a 2013 Rams roster that does not include Jackson, the roles will be much larger. According to the NFL statistical service, Jackson was on the field for 707 offensive snaps in 2012, or more than twice the amount of Richardson, Pead and Ganaway combined.

    Richardson finished with 301 offensive plays, but his playing time and number of carries decreased dramatically over the second half of the season as Jackson’s playing time increased. As for Pead and Ganaway, predicting how they can contribute in 2013 is largely a projection because there’s a minuscule sample size of playing time to evaluate them as NFL players.

    Pead had a few successful carries in the season finale against Seattle but participated in only 40 offensive plays and carried the ball only 10 times all season. As for Ganaway, who was claimed off waivers from the New York Jets at the end of the preseason, he was on the field for only five offensive plays last season and didn’t have a carry or catch.

    So the question then becomes, should the Rams augment that trio by adding a running back in the draft? Given the Rams’ limited salary cap space and a less than stellar group of veteran running backs on the market, it seems unlikely they will go the free-agent route.

    If it’s via the draft, how high are the Rams willing to go to get one? Alabama’s Eddie Lacy looks like the only sure first-round pick in this year’s draft class, and the Rams probably could get him with their second of two first-round picks — at No. 22 overall.

    At 5-11, 231 pounds, Lacy would provide a big-back element that only Ganaway (6-1, 240) brings to the current backfield minus Jackson. Lacy made the most of his only year as an Alabama feature back, gaining 1,322 yards on 204 carries, an average of 6.5 yards a carry. In the BCS title game against Notre Dame, he looked like a man among boys, breaking tackles and running through the Fighting Irish defense.

    There is some curiosity about his speed — is he a 4.5 guy or 4.6? Lacy says he can run 4.4. But he didn’t get a chance to run the 40 or participate in the workout at the scouting combine because of a hamstring injury during training. It’s not even a certainty whether Lacy will run at Alabama’s pro day March 13.

    Lacy had a tendency to get nicked up over his Alabama career, including ankle and knee problems, plus a toe injury that required surgery. But there may not have been a better big-game back in college football last season. He had 181 yards and two touchdowns in the SEC title game against Georgia and rushed for 140 yards against Notre Dame.

    “I was able to show up in the big games on the big stages,” Lacy said. “And in the NFL every game is a big game, no matter what. So if I was able to perform well in those games, you know it should be an indication that I can do the same thing in the NFL.”

    Behind Lacy, as possible second- or third-rounders, are prospects such as Giovani Bernard (5-8, 202) of North Carolina, Joseph Randle (6-0, 204) of Oklahoma State, Stepfan Taylor (5-9, 214) of Stanford and local product Montee Ball (5-10, 214) of Wisconsin via Timberland High in Wentzville.

    But no one in that group has great size, and no one in that group ran a sub-4.5 in the 40 at the combine.

    Undoubtedly the Rams looked at Marcus Lattimore at the combine, particularly his medical reports after he suffered a season-ending knee injury for the second year in a row at South Carolina. Were it not for the injury, Lattimore probably would be the top running back in the draft. Now, it’s anybody’s guess as to where he will get taken, and even if he’ll be ready for the start of the regular season.

    “The day after it happened, of course, I was thinking about what could have been,” Lattimore said. “What could have happened. But I don’t think about that anymore.”


    Roger Hensley is the assistant managing editor/sports at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. He can be followed on Twitter @stlhensley


  2. #2
    Vinnie25's Avatar
    Vinnie25 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    824
    Rep Power
    4

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    I personally like Le'Veon Bell; he's a bigger back (6-1, 230 pounds) who ran a 4.6 at the combine, which is pretty good for his size. He's also a hell of a receiver coming out the backfield, and I think he would compliment are other smaller backs (Pead, Richardson) well. Might be able to get him with a 2nd round pick, maybe even a 3rd round pick if were lucky.

  3. #3
    Truck is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New Haven, MO
    Posts
    62
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    He was also my choice pre combine. Looks like a perfect replacement for SJ39.

  4. #4
    MACD is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    I didn't realize Pead and Richardson are the same size. I thought Pead was smaller. Has he ever been a consideration as a slot receiver with his speed and shiftiness?
    live4ramin likes this.

  5. #5
    TorontoRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saint Louis
    Posts
    220
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by MACD View Post
    I didn't realize Pead and Richardson are the same size. I thought Pead was smaller. Has he ever been a consideration as a slot receiver with his speed and shiftiness?
    You raise a good point regarding a slot receiver, which we might need as well as a RB. The dilemma for me is whether to fill those spots with FAs or DPs primarily. I hope Fish/Snead choose wisely.

  6. #6
    Ram Dragoon's Avatar
    Ram Dragoon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,203
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    Thing is if you have a big physical O-line, a decent RB can run rampant in an opponents backfield. If you have a big physical O-line, Bradford stays on his feet longer to deliver the ball.

    As much as I would love to see Jackson in 2013, I think going deep for a RB/WR would be a waste of a pick considering the depth in 2013 draft for lineman and defense. Further lots of other teams face simular issues trying to retain players. Its just possible the Rams can pickup a free agent at WR/RB thus allowing the Rams to boaster the line
    MauiRam likes this.

  7. #7
    mde8352gorams's Avatar
    mde8352gorams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    There's a good article on NFL.com from Bucky Brooks who was at the Combine and labeled La'Veon Bell as the best RB in the draft class. He based that largely on Bell's ability to run between the tackles or fast enough to get to the perimeter. He also is a very talented receiver who can stay on the field during non-running downs. But perhaps what caught my eye was that he labeled Bell a "Steven Jackson clone".

    If we lose Sjax, I sort of hope we get this guy in the third or fourth round, providing he's there.

    Go Rams!

  8. #8
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,944
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    I like SJ but if we move on I want to go with a more of a home run hitter then a power back. I'm looking froward to seeing what Pead can do and also get a look at Ganaway and see what he is capable of doing, before I would want to spend another draft pick. We have three backs from last years draft, I hope we don't need to spend another one on a RB.

  9. #9
    mde8352gorams's Avatar
    mde8352gorams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by Rambos View Post
    I like SJ but if we move on I want to go with a more of a home run hitter then a power back. I'm looking froward to seeing what Pead can do and also get a look at Ganaway and see what he is capable of doing, before I would want to spend another draft pick. We have three backs from last years draft, I hope we don't need to spend another one on a RB.
    I don't necessarily disagree with you as I hope Pead steps up to become the tailback we expected last year after the draft. I do know we are playing in a division with very good defenses and and we'd better have a running game that can extend drives for us. I also know the preference Jeff Fisher has for the running game so we may draft a RB in the mid-late rounds who can grind out those tough yards. This all presupposes that SJax leaves, which I'm not convinced will happen.

    Go Rams!

  10. #10
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,944
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Thomas: Rams' Backfield Picture Hazy Without Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by mde8352gorams View Post
    I don't necessarily disagree with you as I hope Pead steps up to become the tailback we expected last year after the draft. I do know we are playing in a division with very good defenses and and we'd better have a running game that can extend drives for us. I also know the preference Jeff Fisher has for the running game so we may draft a RB in the mid-late rounds who can grind out those tough yards. This all presupposes that SJax leaves, which I'm not convinced will happen.

    Go Rams!
    If you mean get the tough yards to keep drive alive... Ganaway at 6-1, 240 Lbs he's big enough to move the chains. Not sure why we would want to use another mid round pick when we had him on our board last year. The Jets took him in the 6th round.

    Lets not forget he rushed for 1,547 yards with 21 touchdowns in his senor year. I think the kids worth a look before we spend another draft pick. Well see Fisher has a real good eye for RB talent.
    Last edited by Rambos; -03-02-2013 at 08:37 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Thomas: Rams Douse Jackson Rumors
    By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -10-31-2012, 02:45 PM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: -09-23-2010, 10:17 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -11-06-2006, 09:00 AM
  4. Rams | Team enters picture for Grady Jackson
    By ramsbruce in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -03-21-2006, 03:47 PM
  5. Bernie on a Faulk/Jackson backfield
    By Nick in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-11-2004, 11:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •