View Poll Results: I will go totally ballistic if:

Voters
52. You may not vote on this poll
  • Steve Spagnuolo is retained.

    8 15.38%
  • Billy Devaney is retained.

    3 5.77%
  • The Rams don't take a WR in the first two rounds of the draft.

    14 26.92%
  • The Rams don't retain Brandon Lloyd.

    3 5.77%
  • The Rams don't replace at least two starting OL.

    17 32.69%
  • The Rams don't sign at least one premium FA.

    4 7.69%
  • The Rams don't fire the entire FO (other than Demoff) and coaching staff.

    3 5.77%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

  1. #16
    Keenum's Avatar
    Keenum is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Age
    25
    Posts
    2,865
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    O-line. Bradford MUST have a decent amount of time to pass or he WILL go the Marc Bulger route soon from the beating he is taking. Plus, even though Jackson is still in good shape overall, with the wear he as taken combined with his age, you would think he might have 1 or 2 "premium" years left before he will absolutely need a No.2 RB to split carries with.

    I am convinced that with a better O-line the Rams would have been a much better team. With the way everything else has turned out, probably still not a playoff team, but much more competitive than we have seen.
    Agrajag likes this.


  2. #17
    LA Rammer's Avatar
    LA Rammer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wilmington, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,679
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fettmaster View Post
    Losing isn't anything to be patient for, LA
    I hear you Fett, but the thread title is "What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?" If he (Spags) stays I wouldn't be surprised. I would like him fired immediately, but I know it won't happen, hence I won't go ballistic.

    My comments are looking at positive aspects. I do believe he can get us to .500 and that's all. (With a healthy squad) Knowing we need a stud receiver and won't go after one really gets me hoppin' mad. You have Julio Jones out there running circles in Atlanta and we sign everybody's rejects.

    IMO our linemen are BUST and our secondary can't cover its shadow, but who am I? I think everybody sees what your saying and might be in denial. I really sincerely feel St. Louis is not an NFL city. Cards never did jack in St. Louie, St. Louie has a heck of a baseball team, but not football. (RED SEATS) Rams are not committed to winning. They are my team and until I decide I have had enough and I'm gone, but til then I'll try to see the cup half full.

    St. Louis folks I don't mean no disrespect. Only reason Rams are in St. Louis is because of a dead rich white woman. GSOT was just an unexplainable freak of nature.

    As a famous philosopher says, "Ramming speed to all" and to all a good night.
    Fettmaster likes this.
    LA RAMMER

    It's Jim not Chris
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HNgqQVHI_8

  3. #18
    Fettmaster's Avatar
    Fettmaster is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,161
    Rep Power
    24

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Agree to disagree.

  4. #19
    RuffRams's Avatar
    RuffRams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,180
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    I really really really want Justin Blackmon

  5. #20
    Agrajag is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    209
    Rep Power
    5

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Sure, the Cards never did anything when they were here, but the subject of this forum did ... right here in St. Louis. Don't blame the city for the owners, management and players, that just doesn't make any sense.

    I will admit that this city is a baseball city first, and I can't even stand baseball. But no city supports a losing team for long. And that's what happens when your team sucks.

    Fine, you want a football team, fine you want the Rams back. Stan may very well do just that for you. But don't go blaming my St. Louis for the team's problems. They just finally got an owner that cares, sheesh.

  6. #21
    sosa39rams's Avatar
    sosa39rams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, On
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Agrajag View Post
    Sure, the Cards never did anything when they were here, but the subject of this forum did ... right here in St. Louis. Don't blame the city for the owners, management and players, that just doesn't make any sense.

    I will admit that this city is a baseball city first, and I can't even stand baseball. But no city supports a losing team for long. And that's what happens when your team sucks.

    Fine, you want a football team, fine you want the Rams back. Stan may very well do just that for you. But don't go blaming my St. Louis for the team's problems. They just finally got an owner that cares, sheesh.
    The city of Cleveland continues to back the Browns extremely well..Same as Oakland.. They've both sucked for a while. The Chiefs too.

  7. #22
    Flippin' Ram's Avatar
    Flippin' Ram is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,435
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Quote Originally Posted by LA Rammer View Post
    St. Louis folks I don't mean no disrespect. Only reason Rams are in St. Louis is because of a dead rich white woman. GSOT was just an unexplainable freak of nature.
    Stan Kroenke was also the mastermind behind the Rams moving to St. Louis. Don't go thinking that dead woman was the only one responsible for moving the Rams to St. Louis.

  8. #23
    Agrajag is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    209
    Rep Power
    5

    Re: What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

    Yeah, but didn't the Rams basically move from LA due to a lack of fan support there?

    Stan will likely just gravitate to the stadium that is poised to earn him the most money.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Most Questionable Move Of Offseason
    By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: -07-21-2009, 09:58 PM
  2. Best Offseason Personnel Move (So Far)
    By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: -04-18-2009, 08:54 PM
  3. Rams make Top 10 worst offseason move list
    By txramsfan in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: -05-19-2008, 06:35 PM
  4. Did we make the right move?
    By laram0 in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -01-16-2008, 08:29 PM
  5. Best Offseason Move The Rams DIDN'T Make
    By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: -07-28-2006, 03:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •