What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?

[Keenum]

O-line. Bradford MUST have a decent amount of time to pass or he WILL go the Marc Bulger route soon from the beating he is taking. Plus, even though Jackson is still in good shape overall, with the wear he as taken combined with his age, you would think he might have 1 or 2 "premium" years left before he will absolutely need a No.2 RB to split carries with.

I am convinced that with a better O-line the Rams would have been a much better team. With the way everything else has turned out, probably still not a playoff team, but much more competitive than we have seen.

[LA Rammer]

Losing isn't anything to be patient for, LA

I hear you Fett, but the thread title is "What offseason move (or non-move) would make you go the most ballistic?" If he (Spags) stays I wouldn't be surprised. I would like him fired immediately, but I know it won't happen, hence I won't go ballistic.

My comments are looking at positive aspects. I do believe he can get us to .500 and that's all. (With a healthy squad) Knowing we need a stud receiver and won't go after one really gets me hoppin' mad. You have Julio Jones out there running circles in Atlanta and we sign everybody's rejects.

IMO our linemen are BUST and our secondary can't cover its shadow, but who am I? I think everybody sees what your saying and might be in denial. I really sincerely feel St. Louis is not an NFL city. Cards never did jack in St. Louie, St. Louie has a heck of a baseball team, but not football. (RED SEATS) Rams are not committed to winning. They are my team and until I decide I have had enough and I'm gone, but til then I'll try to see the cup half full.

St. Louis folks I don't mean no disrespect. Only reason Rams are in St. Louis is because of a dead rich white woman. GSOT was just an unexplainable freak of nature.

As a famous philosopher says, "Ramming speed to all" and to all a good night.

[Fettmaster]

Agree to disagree.

[RamOG]

I really really really want Justin Blackmon

[Agrajag]

Sure, the Cards never did anything when they were here, but the subject of this forum did ... right here in St. Louis. Don't blame the city for the owners, management and players, that just doesn't make any sense.

I will admit that this city is a baseball city first, and I can't even stand baseball. But no city supports a losing team for long. And that's what happens when your team sucks.

Fine, you want a football team, fine you want the Rams back. Stan may very well do just that for you. But don't go blaming my St. Louis for the team's problems. They just finally got an owner that cares, sheesh.

[sosa39rams]

Sure, the Cards never did anything when they were here, but the subject of this forum did ... right here in St. Louis. Don't blame the city for the owners, management and players, that just doesn't make any sense.

I will admit that this city is a baseball city first, and I can't even stand baseball. But no city supports a losing team for long. And that's what happens when your team sucks.

Fine, you want a football team, fine you want the Rams back. Stan may very well do just that for you. But don't go blaming my St. Louis for the team's problems. They just finally got an owner that cares, sheesh.

The city of Cleveland continues to back the Browns extremely well..Same as Oakland.. They've both sucked for a while. The Chiefs too.

[fliptalianstallion]

St. Louis folks I don't mean no disrespect. Only reason Rams are in St. Louis is because of a dead rich white woman. GSOT was just an unexplainable freak of nature.

Stan Kroenke was also the mastermind behind the Rams moving to St. Louis. Don't go thinking that dead woman was the only one responsible for moving the Rams to St. Louis.

[Agrajag]

Yeah, but didn't the Rams basically move from LA due to a lack of fan support there?

Stan will likely just gravitate to the stadium that is poised to earn him the most money.