View Poll Results: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

Voters
83. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nothing. He's merely a scapegoat for a practice that is commonplace.

    18 21.69%
  • If he is suspended, fire him. Otherwise, keep him.

    7 8.43%
  • Wait until the league imposes its penalties, then decide.

    38 45.78%
  • Fire him now.

    20 24.10%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 83
Like Tree70Likes

Thread: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

  1. #46
    ManofGod's Avatar
    ManofGod is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,524
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by PeoriaRam View Post
    If Fisher's going to be a true friend we thank him for his 2 months of service and move on. One or two years of rebuilding aren't worth losing another decade after the NFL punishes Williams for relapsing.

    The NFL gave itself plausible deniability by destroying the evidence from spygate rather than publicizing it. The same can't be said in this scenario. (although again, "it happened for ages" isn't valid when it looks like the league wants it to stop now.) Additionally the league is triply upset by the coaches paying the bounties and circumventing the cap and mercing the Saints defense to outsiders.
    So they didn't want "spygate" to end as well???


  2. #47
    Ahmedrams81's Avatar
    Ahmedrams81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Fairfax, Virginia
    Posts
    642
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Never like Gregg Williams, i think he's extremely overrated. All he's gonna do for us is overload blitz and leave our avergae db's on one-on-one islands.

  3. #48
    PeoriaRam's Avatar
    PeoriaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,173
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by NJ Ramsfan1 View Post
    Absolutely. The overreaction to this and the myriad conspiracy theories out there are ridiculous- another example of people overthinking things and drawing their own conclusions based on the shaky testimony of disgruntled ex-players and people who lie for a living (agents). My prediction is that the NFL will heavily fine Williams and the Saints organization and strip them of 2-3 high draft picks. They'll also fine Sean Payton for a lack of organizational control under his watch. They will be punished for instituting a payment system which violates league rules, NOT for directives to purposely injure. There is no way to prove that- it is one person's word against another's. And corroborating testimony from ex-players who were released or left teams on bitter terms is not necessarily reliable. I cannot see year long suspensions or lifetime bans or jail time or any other number of wild scenarios proposed by several who really need to maintain some perspective here.
    50,000 pages is shaky testimony.

    Right.

    The NFL has been handing out heavy fines for hits that only could be "heat of the moment" and unpremeditated for the last few years. The fact that bounties are given for cartoffs is sufficient proof that there was intent to injure on orders from Williams. You think the Steelers organization, for example, is going to sit back and watch Williams only get a fine?!

  4. #49
    PeoriaRam's Avatar
    PeoriaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,173
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by ManofGod View Post
    So they didn't want "spygate" to end as well???
    If the evidence from spygate was to be fully released, it would drastically undermine the legitimacy of a league championship. One that has billions of dollars blown on gambling and other things. It's more in the league's interests to sweep it under the rug. While the bounty system does call into question some aspects of the Saints 2009 run, you can't conclusively demonstrate it unfairly benefited the Saints, so the league can go weapons free and release all the evidence without that same fear of undermining things.
    ZiaRam likes this.

  5. #50
    live4ramin's Avatar
    live4ramin is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    The Missouri Low Country
    Posts
    1,322
    Rep Power
    26

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Have they turned out the lights in the draft room? This is a damaging situation right now.

    Everyone turn your head and cough.
    I'm the guy that walks up after the argument's started.

  6. #51
    chucknbob is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Age
    31
    Posts
    462
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    I feel we should do nothing... At least for now. Let's let the NFL finish their investigation and let them lay down the law. If they suspend him for an extended period, we may need to let him go, however i don't think we should be issuing punishment for problems from another team.

  7. #52
    Fat Pang's Avatar
    Fat Pang is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,603
    Rep Power
    64

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by PeoriaRam View Post
    50,000 pages is shaky testimony.

    Right.
    No, its testimony and that's all we know, how extensive it is is immaterial.

    As far as I'm aware, it hasn't been released yet.

    What we know is that there is an investigation into Williams as a participant in a 'Performance related pay/bounty' system that involves Peyton/Loomis and as yet unnamed Saints personnel. We have had additional testimony from players and ex-players outside of the investigation that corroborates the premise of that investigation as well as testimony that rebuts it and contextualises it.

    We don't yet know what the investigation has found or what penalties it will recommend.

    If Williams if found guilty of running/participating in a bounty scheme that encouraged his players to deliberately play outside of the rules of the game with intention to seriously harm opposing players then I would expect him to be suspended/banned and then fired and I would agree with it.

    If the investigation surrounding Williams drags on and into the regular season I think it highly likely he'll be fired or will resign on the basis of distraction and I would agree with it.

    What I will not do, prior to the release of the findings of the investigation, is call for or support calls for Williams firing or the idea that Fisher is guilty by association.

  8. #53
    RAMFANRAIDERHATER's Avatar
    RAMFANRAIDERHATER is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Surf City USA
    Age
    61
    Posts
    2,276
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fat Pang View Post
    No, its testimony and that's all we know, how extensive it is is immaterial.

    As far as I'm aware, it hasn't been released yet.

    What we know is that there is an investigation into Williams as a participant in a 'Performance related pay/bounty' system that involves Peyton/Loomis and as yet unnamed Saints personnel. We have had additional testimony from players and ex-players outside of the investigation that corroborates the premise of that investigation as well as testimony that rebuts it and contextualises it.

    We don't yet know what the investigation has found or what penalties it will recommend.

    If Williams if found guilty of running/participating in a bounty scheme that encouraged his players to deliberately play outside of the rules of the game with intention to seriously harm opposing players then I would expect him to be suspended/banned and then fired and I would agree with it.

    If the investigation surrounding Williams drags on and into the regular season I think it highly likely he'll be fired or will resign on the basis of distraction and I would agree with it.

    What I will not do, prior to the release of the findings of the investigation, is call for or support calls for Williams firing or the idea that Fisher is guilty by association.
    While I agree with most of what you're saying, I cannot agree with your final observation. Williams himself said that he knew what he was doing was wrong and against league rules, yet he continued to do it. I have a major problem with those that thumb their noses at rules and doing the right thing. Fire him now.
    Faithful Rams fan since 1968

  9. #54
    Fat Pang's Avatar
    Fat Pang is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,603
    Rep Power
    64

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by RAMFANRAIDERHATER View Post
    While I agree with most of what you're saying, I cannot agree with your final observation. Williams himself said that he knew what he was doing was wrong and against league rules, yet he continued to do it. I have a major problem with those that thumb their noses at rules and doing the right thing. Fire him now.
    I understand that, really do and can see the case for immediate dismissal.

    However ( and in pointing this out I'm very conscious of appearing to be a pedant or overly academic about it ) I'm not sure what he's admitted to; whether he's admitted that he ran a PRP scheme that violates league rules and he's sorry about it or that he's admitted to running a bounty scheme that went after people with a view to putting them on a cart and is sorry about it.

    Peoria I think, pointed out that encouraging the former may lead to the latter in any case and I can go along with to an extent but I do think that summary dismissal needs more information than we currently have.

  10. #55
    NJ Ramsfan1 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    2,192
    Rep Power
    69

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Have any of you guys read the accounts of dozens of former players who REFUTE this stuff? Who say "yes, there was an incentive based system for big hits and big plays but NEVER a pay for injury system? Why are the initial allegations from thus far anonymous sources automatically believed and the subsequent statements to the contrary discounted? Talk about sloppy, one-sided judgments.

    People like to dwell on the negative. Negativity sells. Negativity provides fodder for conversation. But this pre-occupation with presumed guilt and an an automatic belief that Gregg Williams is the Adolf Hitler of defensive coordinators has to stop. Let the league conduct its investigation and act accordingly.
    Last edited by NJ Ramsfan1; -03-06-2012 at 09:52 AM.

  11. #56
    PeoriaRam's Avatar
    PeoriaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,173
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by NJ Ramsfan1 View Post
    Have any of you guys read the accounts of dozens of former players who REFUTE this stuff? Who say "yes, there was an incentive based system for big hits and big plays but NEVER a pay for injury system? Why are the initial allegations from thus far anonymous sources automatically believed and the subsequent statements to the contrary discounted? Talk about sloppy, one-sided judgments.
    There's a decent chance the former players are lying because telling the truth could expose them to criminal battery charges, possible lawsuits, and tax evasion cases while lying results in, well, there are no consequences for lying to reporters.

  12. #57
    J-RodRamFan's Avatar
    J-RodRamFan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    DMV- Maryland
    Posts
    415
    Rep Power
    3

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Does anyone think that Gregg Williams is only the beginning to this and more names will pop up?

  13. #58
    NJ Ramsfan1 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    2,192
    Rep Power
    69

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    It's hardly a novel thought that to increase one's chances of winning you try to inflict pain to an opposing player and limit his effectiveness if not get him out of the game altogether. Defensive coaches and players have employed this philosophy for years. The gray area is how you achieve this. If it is through good old fashioned football- that is, legally delivered, bone jarring hits, then I have absolutely no problem with it. It's football. If cheap shots or blows to vital areas of the body (head, neck, knees) are a pre-requisite, then obviously it's a much different story.

    The question is "what is a coach obligated to do?" Does he really have to tell guys that are grown professionals that "it's not OK to try and end a guy's career? Does he really have to spell out that "aggressive defense doesn't mean dirty defense?" While many levels of football have incentive-based performance rewards for big plays, it is not allowed according to the NFL rules. Therefore Williams is guilty of that infraction and admitted as such. But you will NEVER hear him say he told his defenses to go out there and purposely try and injure people, and I simply have a hard time believing that.

  14. #59
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,532
    Rep Power
    144

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Why jump ahead of the league on this? To show the league that we're not interested in having a hard-nosed Defense? Because they've known that for a decade now.

    Sorry, all kidding aside.

    I say wait until the League makes their decision. If the league suspends him for 4, 8, 12, 16 games (or however many), then McGinnis is already in place. He will implement the Williams/Fisher plan, and the team will do what they do. It's not like those 3 games aren't already on the same defensive page. From an on-field perspective, I don't think the team will miss a step.

    The question then turns to the off-field perspective. I don't think firing Williams really gives us the PR boost that might be hoped for. Not to sound too cynical, but I highly doubt Williams is the only coach that had a performance-for-pay system. He's just the only one that got caught.
    Fat Pang and NJ Ramsfan1 like this.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  15. #60
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,221
    Rep Power
    127

    Re: What should the Rams do about Gregg Williams?

    Quote Originally Posted by NJ Ramsfan1 View Post
    Does he really have to spell out that "aggressive defense doesn't mean dirty defense?" While many levels of football have incentive-based performance rewards for big plays, it is not allowed according to the NFL rules. Therefore Williams is guilty of that infraction and admitted as such. But you will NEVER hear him say he told his defenses to go out there and purposely try and injure people, and I simply have a hard time believing that.
    I don't think Williams specifically told players to go out and break someones leg, but he did institute a program that paid out the most money for hits that resulted in players being carted off the field on a stretcher. Can that be accomplished without causing an injury? It seems pretty clear to me causing an injury is implied, and many players have stated as much in describing how the bounty system works. In refuting the injury aspect of this issue, many players have said Williams never overtly instructed them to crack skulls, but they also never denied the existance of being paid for "knockout" or "cart off" hits. Again, I don't see how you get a "knockout" or "cart off" without inflicting injury.

    Regardless of what anyone thinks, it's clear from memos and document releases that the NFL is working on the assumption that there was intent to cause injury in rewarding "knockout" and "cart off" hits.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Welcome Gregg Williams!
    By sosa39rams in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: -01-17-2012, 04:31 PM
  2. Gregg Williams is going to the
    By eauclare in forum NFL TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -01-15-2009, 06:44 PM
  3. Gregg Williams anyone?
    By RamsSB99 in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: -02-01-2008, 06:13 PM
  4. Gregg Williams // Wash Red // ESPN
    By Tony Soprano in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: -01-02-2006, 04:30 AM
  5. Washington Post on Gregg Williams
    By STLRAMSFAN in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: -12-30-2005, 11:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •