View Poll Results: If you had a choice

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • Stay home in St. Louis. That town isn't too bad.

    14 82.35%
  • Return to LA. Thats where we belong

    3 17.65%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    RamWraith's Avatar
    RamWraith is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Minnesota
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,230
    Rep Power
    61

    Where would you rather be?

    elAcky brought up something interesting. Would you rather see the team play in LA or St. Louis??


  2. #2
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    The Rams are St. Louis's team now. The support is tremendous.

  3. #3
    thoey's Avatar
    thoey is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,077
    Rep Power
    34

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    I really was disenchanted for a while when they moved to STL, but I am used to them there now. They are the ST. Louis Rams...
    This space for rent...

  4. #4
    WILLN107 Guest

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    St. Louis was there for them when they were down. The dome stayed mostly full even when we were 5-11. The fans are great even when we lose. St. Louis is home and will be for a long time.

  5. #5
    RAMMAN68's Avatar
    RAMMAN68 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,714
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    All the above responses are true, St. Louis has adopted the Rams as their own. Fan support is better than it was when they were in LA. Though, if they were to move back I would be very happy, and a season ticket holder.
    :ramlogo:
    JUST WIN ONE FOR THE FANS


    "HIT HARD, HIT FAST, AND HIT OFTEN"
    Adm. William "Bull" Halsey

  6. #6
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,709
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    No disrespect towards the true SoCal Ram Fans that we have on this board, but the Rams have received more support from the 2 million in the St. Louis area than they did the 11 million in the LA area. Again, I will be the first to say that some of the most diehard fans I've ever seen are from Cali, but I'd say on a per capita basis, St. Louis has been better to the Rams.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  7. #7
    rampower's Avatar
    rampower is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    cumbria, UK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    835
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    gotta be st louis, its a shorter flight from the UK! But seriously, these are the St louis rams now, how many fans would fight to stop this team moving from Missouri??

    lots

  8. #8
    Bob L. Head Guest

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    I hate to admit it, but the Rams seem to be better off in St. Louis. Having said that, I sure whish they'd come back, because I only get to see 1 or 2 games a year at most now.

  9. #9
    sbramfan Guest

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    Wouldn't it be crazy if some team (like the rams) that has been in more than one city, claimed 2 cities as home??

    and played 3 or 4 "home" games in each?

    I realize this isn't totally realistic, but then again, why not?

    Teams have free agency now and we're starting to see the trend of moving to a new city to get a better deal/stadium, etc...

    It might work if a new team came on board and didn't call themselves by a city, and just cut a deal with 2 towns to play games.

  10. #10
    Bob L. Head Guest

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    Quote Originally Posted by sbramfan
    Wouldn't it be crazy if some team (like the rams) that has been in more than one city, claimed 2 cities as home??

    and played 3 or 4 "home" games in each?
    Oakland is trying to claim they own both the Oakland and L.A. markets. Green Bay used to play half their games in Milwaukee.

    You're right. That is crazy.

  11. #11
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,093
    Rep Power
    132

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    For selfish reasons I would love to see the Rams in LA, but must admit the fit in St. Louis has been nothing but great for the team. Most LA Ram fans were never able to get past the move to Anahiem, let alone St. Louis. Now nobody in LA seems to care about having a football team and everyone I know hates the Rams. Too many transplant Green Bay fans, New York fans, Chicago fans, Philly fans, Detroit fans..... well you get the picture.

  12. #12
    tanus is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    535
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    hell, with how good they have been in the past few years, STL it is! man, it would be sweet to see some live games though in LA.

  13. #13
    RamsFanSam's Avatar
    RamsFanSam is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Springfield, Missouri, United States
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,718
    Rep Power
    73

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    Considering the regional choices left to an Ozarks resident....the Rams HAVE to stay in St. Louis...
    Our only other choices around here are the team from KC (who I am still pissed off at for releasing my niece from the cheerleaders), the goat ropers, er, cowpokers, or the Oilers, um, Titans....everyone else is too far away to really feel any connection to. Of course, I guess we could go to Branson and watch some old has-been country artist try to act like they know rock music....
    Nah....the Rams belong to St. Louis now....

  14. #14
    28rulz Guest

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    I will like them no matter where they are, but for selfish reasons I would like them to stay. I do not like the two cities theory. I am not sure I really care...I like so many teams all over...you know. I mean the Rams are my team, but I like most teams, so location is not key for me...but I cannot root for the Titans or the Broncos.

  15. #15
    ramstiles's Avatar
    ramstiles is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    surrey, england,
    Age
    61
    Posts
    780
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Where would you rather be?

    I agree with Tx and RAMPOWER the rams are St Louis team now but on the odd occasion I come over from england the warm weather of LA would be easier to convince 'er indoors to visit for a holiday

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •