Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    The Shredder Guest

    Re: Who would win between All-time Chiefs vs. All-time Rams (this includes LA Rams)

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDaddyPace View Post
    Come on dude. Marshall gets the start over Dickerson.
    I dunno man, Dickerson is probably one of the top 5 Rb's to ever play the game.


  2. #17
    RealRam's Avatar
    RealRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8,221
    Rep Power
    68

    Re: Who would win between All-time Chiefs vs. All-time Rams (this includes LA Rams)

    Originally Posted by BigDaddyPace
    Come on dude. Marshall gets the start over Dickerson.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Shredder View Post
    I dunno man, Dickerson is probably one of the top 5 Rb's to ever play the game.

    This is simply a difficult call. Solution for the sake of this thread: Dickerson OR Faulk!


    They're two different types of RBs, both enormously successful with the Rams, both to meet each other at the NFL HOF in a few years.

    It's like comparing Mike Garrett* with Priest Holmes*.


    *. - Wait a minute, both Garrett and Holmes are 5-9"! Interesting.
    Last edited by RealRam; -05-09-2007 at 08:17 PM. Reason: Added PS after looking up both Chiefs RBs

  3. #18
    ramsbruce's Avatar
    ramsbruce is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Here
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,406
    Rep Power
    50

    Re: Who would win between All-time Chiefs vs. All-time Rams (this includes LA Rams)

    Quote Originally Posted by RealRam View Post
    This is simply a difficult call. Solution for the sake of this thread: Dickerson OR Faulk!


    They're two different types of RBs, both enormously successful with the Rams, both to meet each other at the NFL HOF in a few years.
    Exactly, it's not that easy of a call to put Faulk above Dickerson as Big Daddy was suggesting.

    I understand why some younger posters who never saw E.D. play live week in and week out would automatically put Faulk above him, but for us older fans who actually got to see them both live it's a tough call IMO, and like RR said, they are completely different, so it's real hard to rank one above the other.

    Nice post Real Ram, rep for you.
    BRUUUUUUUUCE


  4. #19
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is online now Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    18,492
    Rep Power
    167

    Re: Who would win between All-time Chiefs vs. All-time Rams (this includes LA Rams)

    1st and 10: Dickerson
    2nd and 5: Dickerson
    2nd and 10: Faulk
    3rd and 10: Faulk
    3rd/4th and 1: either

    How's that for a copout!

  5. #20
    The Shredder Guest

    Re: Who would win between All-time Chiefs vs. All-time Rams (this includes LA Rams)

    Quote Originally Posted by RealRam View Post
    This is simply a difficult call. Solution for the sake of this thread: Dickerson OR Faulk!


    They're two different types of RBs, both enormously successful with the Rams, both to meet each other at the NFL HOF in a few years.

    It's like comparing Mike Garrett* with Priest Holmes*.


    *. - Wait a minute, both Garrett and Holmes are 5-9"! Interesting.
    I dunno the general consensus in KC will say that Priest was the better RB, though Garrett was really good as well but a bit before my time. Priest one day will be in KC's ring of fame.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Have Fun,enjoy
    By OldRamsfan in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: -06-21-2006, 12:54 PM
  2. RamView, 12/4/2005: Redskins 24, Rams 9 (Long)
    By MFranke in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -12-06-2005, 02:10 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: -10-31-2005, 11:00 PM
  4. Salary Cap Request
    By HUbison in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -12-31-2004, 02:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •