Why?

[Guam rammer]

Why didn't we run our horse against the leagues worst run D? Why didn't spags challenge the no catch ruling on potential 1st and goal in the 2nd quarter? Why did we still play so conservative when the seahawks never gave up their lead? Why couldnt DX pull in those two potential game changing catches. Why did our young QB have to be the one to lock up the game for the Seahawks with an INT. Why does next year have to be soo exciting when this year could've been huge for this organization to make it into the playoffs and rise even more from the trenches? Answers please!!!

[sjacksonrules]

Why didn't we run our horse against the leagues worst run D? Why didn't spags challenge the no catch ruling on potential 1st and goal in the 2nd quarter? Why did we still play so conservative when the seahawks never gave up their lead? Why couldnt DX pull in those two potential game changing catches. Why did our young QB have to be the one to lock up the game for the Seahawks with an INT. Why does next year have to be soo exciting when this year could've been huge for this organization to make it into the playoffs and rise even more from the trenches? Answers please!!!

Because it was meant to be. We werent meant to win that game. Heck would we have Sam Bradford if we won more games that answers no. So maybe this will be a good thing. Get a better draft pick and make a REAL run at the playoffs.

[AlphaRam]

Because it was meant to be. We werent meant to win that game. Heck would we have Sam Bradford if we won more games that answers no. So maybe this will be a good thing. Get a better draft pick and make a REAL run at the playoffs.

Losing a game - especially this game - is never good. If we need someone bad enough, we can always trade up in the draft. The Patriots do it all of the time.

[sjacksonrules]

Losing a game - especially this game - is never good. If we need someone bad enough, we can always trade up in the draft. The Patriots do it all of the time.

Well it goes without saying that I wanted them to win and goto the playoffs. But I look at it this way we probabally werent going to make the superbowl facing all facts. So in turn I think it was probabally meant to be that we got the better pick so we could reload better for next years playoff run.

[DaRam13]

We could have possibly won that game last night and gone on to play next week and then go home. Doesn't sound like much does it? But things like that can change the way this team sees itself and that alone can make a bigger difference than any player we may pick up a few selections earlier. The teams that seem to make the playoffs year after year don't seem to worried about where they end up in the draft, they're more focused on winning, not draft position. This years team was a kick to follow and gave me more thrills than any team we have put on the field for years. I know next year is going to be more of the same a can't wait for opening day kickoff.

[MACD]

Because....

[gap]

Losing a game - especially this game - is never good. If we need someone bad enough, we can always trade up in the draft. The Patriots do it all of the time.

The cheatroits don't have to play against the questionable officiating we have, so they don't need as talented players to win games. They also have people recording their oppents earlier games (spygate still going strong) from the stands, so they know how to defend them. They also have more draft picks because the league doesn't punish them when they are caught (in the public eye) of this cheating. They also have better draft picks because the teams they trade with always seam to have a down year, the year that the cheatroits have their pick. I wonder how that happens. ;/

Please don't compare our RAMS to the cheatroits. The RAMS will NEVER be allowed the lattitude that the cheatroits are given.


gap