Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-11-14-2006 #1
Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
The only change was Hill for Fisher and we for the most part we shut them down. Have they figured it out or will they continue to give running back HOF numbers next week.
-
-11-14-2006 #2
Re: Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
i wouldnt get too excited. Backup qb, backup running back and two missing starters on the offense line in the pouring rain. plus, with the game on the line, we couldnt stop them. In addition, holmgrens play calling stunk.
ramming speed to all
general counsel

-
-11-14-2006 #3
Re: Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
but at the same time hill can press the receiver a lot more while fisher can not which lets haslett bring up another defender in the box
-
-11-14-2006 #4
Re: Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
Hill looked better then Fisher, at this point let Hill play as much as he can.
-
-11-14-2006 #5
Re: Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
-
-11-14-2006 #6
Re: Why haven’t we seen the defense that played in the second half?
Plus, has everyone forgotten how badly Hill got burned earlier in the season? Let's not act like this kid has no holes in his game. He's young and it shows.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks