| ClanRam |
|
|
| 9/7 |
Eagles |
L |
3 - 38 |
| 9/14 |
Giants |
L |
13-41 |
| 9/21 |
Seahawks |
L |
13-37 |
| 9/28 |
Bills |
L |
14-31 |
| 10/5 |
BYE |
|
| 10/12 |
Redskins |
W |
19-17 |
| 10/19 |
Cowboys |
W |
34-14 |
| 10/26 |
Patriots |
L |
16-23 |
| 11/10 |
Cardinals |
L |
13-34 |
| 11/10 |
Jets |
L |
3-47 |
| 11/16 |
Whiners |
L |
16-35 |
| 11/23 |
Bears |
L |
3-27 |
| 11/30 |
Dolphins |
L |
12-16 |
| 12/7 |
Cardinals |
- |
3:15pm |
| 12/14 |
Seahawks |
- |
Noon |
| 12/21 |
Whiners |
- |
Noon |
| 12/28 |
Falcons |
- |
Noon |
|
|
|
|
|
| Notices |
This site is for All Rams fans, the world over.
Please register now, for free, and benefit for new features that only come with being a registered member of the ClanRam |
|
View Poll Results: RamTime's made his case - what's your verdict?
|
|
The only explanation I can accept is that the refs were directed to favor the Patriots.
|
  
|
8 |
25.00% |
|
No conspiracy, just a horribly officiated game.
|
  
|
19 |
59.38% |
|
Refs always make bad calls in a game - in this one they were just more significant than in most.
|
  
|
2 |
6.25% |
|
Whatever the refs did or did not do, it did not influence the outcome.
|
  
|
3 |
9.38% |
 |
|

-01-07-2005
|
 |
Mild Mannered Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,519
Rep Power: 45
|
|
|
You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
What do you think about the Rams/Patriots Super Bowl having seen RamTime's evidence?
|

-01-07-2005
|
 |
Veteran Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 60
Posts: 564
Rep Power: 10
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
The reason I found my way to this board was because of the post by ?, asking the questions and showing the video clips.
I really was blown away.
The problem to me was, I really don't want to believe that an NFL game could be "fixed", however slightly.
But after seeing those vids, sorry...just WAY too many blatantly bad or non calls, all goiing the Patriots way.
__________________
 People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
|

-01-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,713
Rep Power: 33
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
I don't know what my vote would be here. It's hard for me to believe there was any "official" conspiracy because those types of things usually involve so many people at different levels, it's difficult to keep a lid on them without someone coming clean. But the horrible way the game was officiated and the overwelming slant in the Patriots favor, makes the possibility hard to ignore. It was either some sort of conspiracy to (at the very least) keep the game close, or the worst officiated game in SPORTS history that just by chance favored one team over another at a time when America needed a "patriotic" shot in the arm.
|

-01-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Escondido, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,766
Rep Power: 9
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
I think RT should write a book, then Oliver Stone can make a movie out of it.
:O
|

-01-07-2005
|
 |
Veteran Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 60
Posts: 564
Rep Power: 10
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RAMMAN68
I think RT should write a book, then Oliver Stone can make a movie out of it.
:O
|
LOL
Let's do it.
__________________
 People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Down East NC
Age: 45
Posts: 329
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
I have been screaming conspiracy against the RAMS since tags couldn't block the move to St. Louis; so it's no doubt how I see it.
I know there isn't good game tape of it, but I saw it live, so I know what happened. Take a look at the game where the RAMS finally got that monkey off their backs. On the first kick return by the RAMS, a whiner player pushes a RAM into the path of the ball when the returner is waving everyone away. It was a BLATANT block in the back. Then the loose ball is rolling across the field, with everyone trying to secure it. There is a HUGE pile-up, and the officials are digging through the pile to see who has it. After a bit, the officials shrug and start to award the ball to the whiners. The only problem was Troy Pelsheck standing there trying to show them he has the ball. Funny how fox managed to get a camera angle that showed the officials starting to point in the whiners favor without including Troy, when he was standing right there. Maas even made some comment about how could it be the RAMS ball when the officials started to point in the whiners direction.
gap
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Superbowl MVP
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Morgantown, WV
Age: 26
Posts: 11,787
Rep Power: 42
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
One of the most horribly officiated games I've ever seen, but I honestly don't believe it was an organized conspiracy.
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Springfield, MO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,228
Rep Power: 21
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
If it wasn't a conspiracy, then here we have proof of the largest group of idiots wearing black and white in history....collective IQ would be about 15.3.
As far as am concerned, the parties involved in the conspiracy should be banned from the NFL like Rose was banned from baseball. No Mercy.
__________________
Hey, you young whippersnappers, I am NOT old!!! Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Visalia ca
Age: 52
Posts: 2,096
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NickSeiler
One of the most horribly officiated games I've ever seen, but I honestly don't believe it was an organized conspiracy.
|
Patriots? 911? Teddy Kennedy U.S. Senator?not to mention John (dumb a.. Kerry)a lot of Mass. power.  hone:
__________________
bring it on
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Superbowl MVP
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Morgantown, WV
Age: 26
Posts: 11,787
Rep Power: 42
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psycho9985
John (dumb a.. Kerry)
|
This isn't necessary. :tut
While I agree that there is plenty of evidence (or what we feel is evidence) that the officiating favored one side, there's absolutely no hard evidence to suggest that an organized and premeditated conspiracy took place. It may look that way, but it's nothing more than conjecture at this point, IMO.
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Mild Mannered Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,519
Rep Power: 45
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
I don't think it was a conspiracy.
I do, however, think it was a horribly officiated game. I think the culprit was a trend (which continued at least until 2003) of a "let them play" attitude run wild.
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Visalia ca
Age: 52
Posts: 2,096
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvengerRam
I don't think it was a conspiracy.
I do, however, think it was a horribly officiated game. I think the culprit was a trend (which continued at least until 2003) of a "let them play" attitude run wild.
|
But why didnt it go both ways.let'em play has to work both ways.
your right it was badly officiated game,but way was it so one sided.Did the refs think they have the right to level the playing field?Ok Nick in respect for you I'll back off on the politics.
__________________
bring it on
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Mild Mannered Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,519
Rep Power: 45
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
It didn't go both ways because the Rams game is founded on precision, while the Patriots are adept at pushing the rules under the guise of "hard-nosed play."
|

-02-07-2005
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Visalia ca
Age: 52
Posts: 2,096
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AvengerRam
It didn't go both ways because the Rams game is founded on precision, while the Patriots are adept at pushing the rules under the guise of "hard-nosed play."
|
Its still wrong and its still cheating,and it cant keep happening.
__________________
bring it on
|

-03-07-2005
|
 |
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Re: You've seen RamTime's evidence - what's your verdict?
Quote:
|
It didn't go both ways because the Rams game is founded on precision, while the Patriots are adept at pushing the rules under the guise of "hard-nosed play."
|
Very good Avenger. Not one Patriot apologist has been able to come up with something this good. I don't buy it however it's the best argument I have seen. You're a pretty darn good lawyer aren't you Avenger?
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 AM.
|