Results 31 to 36 of 36
-12-26-2005 #31Milan Guest
Re: Anti-SeahawkOriginally Posted by DanS761
-12-26-2005 #32jkramsfan Guest
what the hell is the difference,the colts didnt need to win and really the hawks didnt either,i would like to see them meet in the big game and may the best team win when it counts.
Re: Anti-SeahawkOriginally Posted by akseahawkfan
It wasn't too long ago that the Rams were the crap team of the NFL. They had a 4-12 record, Tony Banks was the QB, and nobody took us seriously.
Sixteen games later, everyone took the Rams seriously.
So, as you see, things can change rather quickly.
While the squaks do look like the real deal this year, things can change quickly there, too. Next year, Seattle may tumble into the cellar. Hasslebeck may be hurt, Alexander might blow out his knee, free agency may take a toll.
So, saying the Rams may be looking up to the squaks in the standings for a few years isn't even close to a sure thing. If you compare the players, the talent level of the Rams is fairly even with that of Seattle on the offensive side. We may even have the advantage in some positions. Defensively, however, the advantage is clearly to the squaks.
Of course, with a new HC and assistants coming in to St. Louis in the next couple of weeks, everything will change. Whether or not it will take years, or only one season is still up in the air. Only time will tell.
As far as the win over the Colts, had tragedy not struck the Dungy family when and how it did, things would have been different. Most of the Indy players knew the coach's son, and it hit them hard. I don't know if you have personally lived through a tragedy like this, but it does take a huge toll on everyone who not only knows the deceased, but even if they only know the family. The Colts were obviously distracted, and not performing at their best.
Personally, I was looking foward to watching the game until I heard of the death of Dungy's son. It was going to be a really good, competitive game, but Indy obviously was not into it as much as they would have been.
Congratulations on winning the NFC West. The squaks have worked long and hard to get to this point. But, just a little advice: After next week, things will get a lot tougher. Just because you think you will prevail doesn't necessarily mean you will. All it takes is one missed tackle, one tipped pass, one false start, and the walrus will be watching the Super Bowl from his living room instead of from the sidelines.
-12-26-2005 #34Seahawk_For_Life Guest
Re: Anti-SeahawkOriginally Posted by ramsbruce
Your "available" full strength is much better than what the Colts "available" full strength was, theres no comparison. Let's compare
But I like how you are now acknowledging that the Seahawks were not at full strength as well. And that was one of my points in the first place. The fact is both teams were not.
Colts : June, Diem, Harrison, Freeney (for most of the game), Manning (for some of the game) Wayne (for some of the game) Bob Sanders, Reagor, Simon, Mathis all sat out due to the game not meaning much to the Colts.
Hawks (According to Dan) : Herndon, Dyson, Darby, and Trufant for 3 quarters. Hass and Alexander in the 4th and if the game were closer Hass and Alexander wouldn't have where as Manning, Wayne, Harrison etc would have sat no matter what.
But from my opening comment, the Hawks were up 14-3 when the Colts started pulling their starters. That's what I feel good about.
So reality says the Colts were really undermanned, and the Hawks were injury free on offense, and had 3 out on D.
Of course you will defend the Hawks, but just be realistic, that wasn't the full strength Colts that you would see in the Superbowl.
If you play like you did yesterday you would have a hard time beating the full strength Colts with your full strength Hawks.
I think we could be competitive with any team in this league. But of course your entitled to your opinion and spin it any way you want.
Re: Anti-SeahawkOriginally Posted by Seahawk_For_Life
But better yet just win a playoff game.Originally Posted by ramsbruce
-12-29-2005 #36BoomGoesTheDynamite! Guest
Re: Anti-SeahawkOriginally Posted by LA Rammer
I don't wish to get into the arguments. I just wanted to point something out to mr rammer. So you are so upset what Indy did, eh? What exactly did Philly do against the Rams last year??? If I remember correctly all sorts of different nfc fans were mad that the Rams got a freebee win that got them into the playoffs. That was much worse than Indy resting guys against seattle who already a spot sewn up themselves. Let's not be hypocritcal in our rabid fandom here.