Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1
    the-king Guest

    espn ranks hawks #1

    this is bull crap

    how is this possible

    Wednesday, June 21



    Power Rankings: Seahawks open at No. 1


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ESPN.com


    We're pretty sure it won't make Steelers fans happy, but the Seahawks open on top after coming up just short in 2005. These rankings were compiled from seven members of ESPN.com's football staff. Each of the seven ranked the teams from 1-32, and the average of those rankings was used to determine our offseason Power Rankings. Of our seven voters, three had Seattle No. 1, three had the Steelers No. 1 and one had the Colts in the top spot.

    ESPN.com's Power Rankings
    The offseason rankings were determined by a poll of ESPN.com's NFL staff -- writers John Clayton, Len Pasquarelli, Michael Smith, Scouts Inc. insiders Jeremy Green and Keith Kidd and ESPN.com NFL editors Peter Lawrence-Riddell and James C. Black.

    The Seahawks lost some key players in G Steve Hutchinson and WR Joe Jurevicius, but most importantly they were able to re-sign the NFL's reigning MVP, RB Shaun Alexander. Losing Hutchinson will hurt, but don't expect it to have too much of an impact on Alexander. He might not be able to match last season's amazing numbers (1,880 yards rushing and 28 TDs), but he'll be in the neighborhood.

    As for the Steelers, they lost some key players this offseason (Antwaan Randle El, Chris Hope, Kimo von Oelhoffen). But assuming Ben Roethlisberger really is ready when the season starts, Pittsburgh will be fine. Big Ben is the key at this point. All the reports are positive, but he obviously suffered some major injuries to his face, and until he gets back on the field we really won't know what kind of an impact it might have on his season.

    A number of teams made big moves from the last time we ranked them (after Week 17). The Cowboys made perhaps the offseason's biggest move, signing Terrell Owens, and jumped from No. 16 in our final rankings to No. 7 this offseason. The Dolphins, who finished 2005 on a six-game winning streak, moved all the way up to No. 8 (from No. 14) and look poised to challenge the Patriots in the AFC East. Assuming he's healthy, Daunte Culpepper gives the Dolphins the top-flight QB they've lacked since Dan Marino left town.

    Anyway, on to the rankings, which we're sure will look completely different after Week 1. You can rank the teams yourself with SportsNation's NFL Power Rankings.

    2006 Power Rankings: Offseason
    RK (LW) TEAM REC COMMENT
    1 (2) Seahawks 13-3-0 Super Bowl losers have struggled in recent years, but the Hawks appear equipped for another run.
    2 (6) Steelers 11-5-0 Obviously the injuries to Ben Roethlisberger weren't as serious as they could have been. But as much work as it sounded like he needed on his face, it's not going to be an easy road back.
    3 (1) Colts 14-2-0 With the versatile Edgerrin James now in the desert, Dominic Rhodes and Joseph Addai have big shoes to fill.
    4 (3) Broncos 13-3-0 Between Jay Cutler and Javon Walker, they've brought in their QB-WR tandem of the future.
    5 (9) Panthers 11-5-0 There's some question about how Keyshawn Johnson and Steve Smith will get along. As much as both guys want the ball, they also want to win and the Panthers should do enough of that in '06 to keep both WRs happy.
    6 (4) Patriots 10-6-0 Yes, the Pats lost some key players this offseason. But are you really ready to hand the AFC East to someone else with Brady and Belichick still at the wheel?
    7 (16) Cowboys 9-7-0 Dallas' offseason was all about T.O. If Owens is the player he was in his first season in Philly (77 receptions for 1,200 yards and 14 TDs), Dallas could be very good.
    8 (14) Dolphins 9-7-0 If Daunte Culpepper is as healthy as it sounds, the Dolphins got a steal in getting him for a second-round pick.
    9 (8) Bengals 11-5-0 Tough offseason for the Bengals with all the off-the-field issues. On the field it's pretty simple -- Cincinnati's season rests on the health of Carson Palmer's left knee.
    10 (12) Redskins 10-6-0 Will this offseason's free-agent spending spree be the one that finally pays off for the Redskins?
    11 (10) Giants 11-5-0 A WR (Plaxico Burress) and his QB (Eli Manning) don't have to get along. That said, it'll be interesting to see how Burress responds the first few times he's open and Manning misses him.
    12 (11) Jaguars 12-4-0 A little more production from the passing game and they could become serious contenders in the AFC.
    13 (5) Bears 11-5-0 The Bears gave up only 12.6 points per game last season and the defense might have to be just as good this year if they want to go back to the playoffs.
    14 (13) Chiefs 10-6-0 Larry Johnson is the real deal, but we're curious as to how that aging O-line will hold up.
    15 (7) Buccaneers 11-5-0 Chris Simms was solid last year, but the Bucs will need a few more big plays from the passing attack in 2006.
    16 (20) Ravens 6-10-0 If he can stay healthy Steve McNair will make the Ravens a better team. But that's a pretty big if.
    17 (15) Chargers 9-7-0 A huge part of their success depends on how the offense flows through Philip Rivers.
    18 (21) Eagles 6-10-0 With a healthy Donovan McNabb the Eagles should be right back in the mix in 2006. That said, it's hard to see them being as good as they were in 2004 without T.O.
    19 (17) Vikings 9-7-0 Steve Hutchinson will obviously help the Vikings. But man, that was a lot of money (7 years and $49 million) to pay for an offensive guard.
    20 (18) Falcons 8-8-0 We can't imagine that Michael Vick would be benched, but there will be calls for Matt Schaub if Vick continues to struggle.
    21 (24) Cardinals 5-11-0 They had arguably the best offseason. Whether that translates to wins remains to be seen.
    22 (22) Rams 6-10-0 Offensive guru Scott Linehan has even more talent to work with than he did in Minnesota and Miami.
    23 (19) Browns 6-10-0 The Browns made some solid moves this offseason. Willie McGinest can still play and he's going to be huge in the locker room.
    24 (26) Lions 5-11-0 One thing we're pretty sure you won't see Rod Marinelli doing this summer is riding a motorcycle onto the field at training camp.
    25 (28) Raiders 4-12-0 Art Shell is clearly a natural fit, but he might have a harder time molding this clay into a winner.
    26 (29) Packers 4-12-0 Having Brett Favre return is huge, but inking Ahman Green and Charles Woodson was just as significant.
    27 (31) Saints 3-13-0 Sean Payton has made it pretty clear that he's going to get rid of guys who aren't buying into what he wants to do.
    28 (23) Bills 5-11-0 Craig Nall, J.P. Losman or Kelly Holcomb? Well, they're going to have to pick one of them, right?
    29 (25) Titans 4-12-0 Starting at quarterback, Billy Volek! Uh, let's see how long that lasts.
    30 (32) Texans 2-14-0 OK, the NFL draft was almost two months ago, but we're still trying to grasp Mario Williams over Reggie Bush.
    31 (27) Jets 4-12-0 When was the last time any one of four QBs on the roster had a chance to be the opening day starter? That's not a good sign.
    32 (30) ***** 4-12-0 So Norv Turner is supposed to come in and rescue the offense? Good luck!


  2. #2
    bigredman Guest

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    They have us at 22? Nuff said. This so called power rating is BS!

  3. #3
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,110
    Rep Power
    132

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Honestly, I think Seattle is as worthy as any other team to be ranked #1. As for our ranking at 22, it really doesn't bother me because it means nothing and we are a true unknown quantity with a great deal to prove.

  4. #4
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    32
    Posts
    19,877
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by the-king
    how is this possible
    Well, they were the NFC's representatives to the Super Bowl. It's not exactly unreasonable that they'd be near the top of the list if not on the top themselves, especially considering the team that beat them in the championship game just had their QB in the hospital and has some uncertainty going into the season about if he'll be completely healthy and able to play as he did.

  5. #5
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,710
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    The answer....

    1. A solar-powered flashlight
    2. A urinal at the Oprah Winfrey Show's bathroom
    3. John Kerry's spine
    4. NFL pre-season rankings

    The question....

    What are 4 things that serve absolutely no useful purpose?
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  6. #6
    Ramming Speed Guest

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    I was reading in my Athlon pre-season NFL mag that of the last five teams that lost the Super Bowl, they ALL had losing records the following season. If history repeats itself (it shallLOL ), the Seahawks' #1 ranking won't mean diddly-squat.

  7. #7
    RAMMAN68's Avatar
    RAMMAN68 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,714
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    They ranked us #1 after the our SB loss. The sqwaks will suffer the same fate.
    JUST WIN ONE FOR THE FANS


    "HIT HARD, HIT FAST, AND HIT OFTEN"
    Adm. William "Bull" Halsey

  8. #8
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    I have a few more for you Bison....

    1. reality television
    2. warning labels on cigarettes
    3. Rams stat of being almost undefeated when running the ball X number of times.

  9. #9
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,110
    Rep Power
    132

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by HUbison
    Excellent points all, tx.
    HUb, didn't the lessons of the "Deletions" thread teach you anything?!LOL LOL

    Sorry, I just couldn't resist my friend.

  10. #10
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,710
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by r8rh8rmike
    HUb, didn't the lessons of the "Deletions" thread teach you anything?!LOL LOL

    Sorry, I just couldn't resist my friend.
    And time....3 hours. Hmm, I have to admit I didn't think it would take that long. I was betting no more than 20 minutes before someone caught it. But hey, it's the offseason.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  11. #11
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,110
    Rep Power
    132

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by HUbison
    And time....3 hours. Hmm, I have to admit I didn't think it would take that long. I was betting no more than 20 minutes before someone caught it. But hey, it's the offseason.
    Oh you wascawy wabbit!LOL

  12. #12
    LA Rammer's Avatar
    LA Rammer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wilmington, CA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,812
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    I was listening to the radio and they were discussing this very topic. One thing they did mention is that even though Seattle was ranked number 1 the Rams possess the ability, with thier talent, to make a run at the playoffs and possibly go quite deep. It all depends on how well we adjust under newhead coach and if Bulger can stay healthy.

    These rankings don't mean anything yet until about maybe week 7 in the season. As for now keep your chins up! Seattle is a good team but the west will be better this year and that will make it tough for them.
    LA RAMMER

    It's Jim not Chris
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HNgqQVHI_8

  13. #13
    KentuckyHawk Guest

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by Ramming Speed
    I was reading in my Athlon pre-season NFL mag that of the last five teams that lost the Super Bowl, they ALL had losing records the following season. If history repeats itself (it shallLOL ), the Seahawks' #1 ranking won't mean diddly-squat.

    That's just another curse we'll have to debunk! (In case you're wondering the Madden curse is the other one!)


    Man, I sure do see a lot of jealousy when it comes to this thread. Especially manifested as "pre-season rankings don't mean anything". Of course they don't, but if you guys had been ranked even in the top 5, you would be tooting your horn all day long.

  14. #14
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,710
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    Quote Originally Posted by KentuckyHawk
    if you guys had been ranked even in the top 5, you would be tooting your horn all day long.
    And that's where you're wrong, my little blue grass friend. You won't find a credible poster on this entire board who puts any faith in pre-season rankings.

    Meaningless from top to bottom. Nice try though.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  15. #15
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: espn ranks hawks #1

    No, if we were ranked in the Top 5 of any preseason poll I would expect it to be one going the other way. Like, the Texans would be the worst team so they would be #1.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •