All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.
Home Contact Us FAQ

ClanRam
bash08
bash08

Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2007 SEASON > NFL TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -26-03-2007
RamWraith's Avatar
RamWraith
Status: Online
Pinball Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minnesota
Age: 38
Posts: 7,407
Rep Power: 31
RamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant futureRamWraith has a brilliant future
Instant replay is here to stay

By Jim Thomas
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
03/25/2007

Scott Linehan of the Rams was successful on four of nine replay challenges in 2006, his rookie season as an NFL head coach.

"I guess that would be a good baseball average," Linehan joked. "But I thought I got them all right."

Linehan's success rate of 44.4 percent was 11th-best in NFL last season, according to research done by the Tacoma (Wash.) News Tribune. So he was better than most. Nonetheless, he would like to see the NFL adopt the college replay system, which relies less on coaches' challenges and more on the booth official.

Linehan shouldn't hold his breath. Among the proposals at the NFL's annual owners meetings that begin Monday in Phoenix is one that would make the league's current replay system permanent.
Advertisement


"We think instant replay has been an accepted part of our game now for a number of years," said Atlanta president Rich McKay, who co-chairs the NFL's competition committee. "It's worked quite well ... so we feel like now is the time to go on a permanent basis."

The NFL's first instant replay system was in place from 1986 to 1991. But it was voted out in 1992 after many complaints. After a seven-year hiatus, replay returned in 1999, but in a more limited form that featured fewer reviews and fewer interruptions to the flow of the game. With some tweaks along the way, replay has been given a couple of extensions since then. Although two years remain on the latest extension, the competition committee wants to make replay permanent now.

"Doesn't mean it can't be changed in the future," McKay said. "Doesn't mean it can't be voted out in the future. But we just felt we would get it to the point where we don't have to every two or three or four or five years revisit the issue of whether it passes or not."

Among other rules proposals at the league meetings:

— The spot of kickoffs would be moved to the 35-yard line in overtime, remaining at the 30 during regulation time.

Prior to 1994, when the kickoff was moved back to the 30 (from the 35), the team that won the coin toss in overtime won the game 46.8 percent of the time. But over the past decade, that percentage has increased up to more than 62 percent.

"So there has been in our mind a pretty dramatic shift," McKay said. "And we just think that the easiest way to attack that is to move that kickoff line."

In theory, that will lead to more touchbacks for the kicking team and lessened field position for the team that wins the overtime coin toss.

For his part, Linehan would love to see the NFL use the college overtime system, in which each team gets a possession starting at the opponent's 25-yard line.

"Both teams would get a chance to score," Linehan said. "If not, I think giving each team a possession in the current system would be the next best thing. Moving the ball five yards (on kickoffs), I don't know."

— Spiking the ball on the field of play — an area that would not include the end zone or the sidelines — would result in a 5-yard penalty.

"This is an issue to us that has really shown itself in the last two years, where it seems like every play ... results in a player stepping up, spiking the ball, the ball bouncing 15 yards away, and the officials having to go run it down," McKay said. "We don't think it's good for sportsmanship. We don't think it's good for administration (of the game)."

Other proposals include installation of a coach-to-defense communication system, revising the way coaches must report injuries during the week, and increasing the game-day roster to 47 from 45 players.
__________________

"I would much rather have a bottle in front of me than a
frontal lobotomy"!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -26-03-2007
Facing-The-Giant's Avatar
Facing-The-Giant
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ladue, Missouri
Posts: 519
Rep Power: 0
Facing-The-Giant - if doing towards the "whinee side"
Re: Instant replay is here to stay

I agree, bring in the college replay. it is better. and the overtime rule should be that of college football too.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -26-03-2007
ramsanddodgers's Avatar
ramsanddodgers
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,612
Rep Power: 11
ramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to behold
Re: Instant replay is here to stay

I never really grasped the inconsistency of calling intentional grounding if a player threw the ball away when under pressure but spiking the ball to kill the clock wasn't intentional grounding. I think a 5 yard penalty is a good thing in this case.

I understand the main difference is that a sack is not imminent when spiking the ball.

Same goes for it being legal to throw the ball away if outside the "tackle box" and the ball being thrown at the line of scrimmage. If the QB did not feel threatened why throw it into the line of scrimmage? Either an eligible receiver is "in the area" or it is intentional grounding when under pressure.

Throwing it away is throwing it away.

It is legal sometimes and not legal other times? :x

Yes, we have benefitted from this at times and a team is supposed to take advantage of any and all quirks in the rules, but still....

RnD

GO RAMS!!:l

RnD

GO RAMS!!
__________________
RnD

GO RAMS!!



Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #4 (permalink)  
Old -27-03-2007
rammiser's Avatar
rammiser
Status: Online
Veteran Ram
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 34
Posts: 908
Rep Power: 9
rammiser is a name known to allrammiser is a name known to allrammiser is a name known to allrammiser is a name known to allrammiser is a name known to allrammiser is a name known to all
Re: Instant replay is here to stay

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramsanddodgers View Post
I never really grasped the inconsistency of calling intentional grounding if a player threw the ball away when under pressure but spiking the ball to kill the clock wasn't intentional grounding. I think a 5 yard penalty is a good thing in this case.

I understand the main difference is that a sack is not imminent when spiking the ball.
I think they mean spiking the ball in celebration after a big play not being a score would draw a penalty, not spiking the ball to kill the clock.
__________________
I do not and will not give respect to the CHEATRIOTS!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -27-03-2007
ramsanddodgers's Avatar
ramsanddodgers
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,612
Rep Power: 11
ramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to behold
Re: Instant replay is here to stay

Quote:
Originally Posted by rammiser View Post
I think they mean spiking the ball in celebration after a big play not being a score would draw a penalty, not spiking the ball to kill the clock.
Yes, it appears I may have been ummmm...
mistaken?:\

Rnd

GO RAMS!!:l
__________________
RnD

GO RAMS!!



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -28-03-2007
laram0's Avatar
laram0
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 51
Posts: 4,678
Rep Power: 19
laram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud of
Re: Instant replay is here to stay

The overtime issue is a tough one. It does hurt when our team plays their hearts out and the game ends in a tie. Then the winner of the coin flip (62% of the time) wins the game. Not so sure moving the Kick-off up 5 yards is going to make that much of a difference.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.comAd Management by RedTyger