|
|
| Notices |
This site is for All Rams fans, the world over.
Please register now, for free, and benefit for new features that only come with being a registered member of the ClanRam |
 |

-14-03-2008
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,573
Rep Power: 10
|
|
|
Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Quote:
Killion: New 49er won't wear Rice's No. 80
By Ann Killion
Mercury News
Article Launched: 03/13/2008 03:28:23 AM PDT
Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80.
The *****, usually tone-deaf when it comes to honoring their past, put this percolating issue to rest Wednesday.
Jersey numbers will be assigned next week, but no sacrilege will take place. There will be no blasphemy when Bruce gets dressed for his first practice.
"Isaac Bruce will not be wearing No. 80," team spokesman Aaron Salkin said. "We are leaving it in honor of Jerry Rice's legacy."
That's nice. Now let's get to the more important part of the legacy-preserving: When is the jersey retirement ceremony?
Ever since Bruce signed with the ***** two weeks ago, the question has been lingering about which number he would wear. Bruce wore No. 80 throughout his stellar career with the St. Louis Rams and didn't automatically say the appropriate thing when the question was asked. No 49er in his right mind would ever consider donning No. 80, but Bruce never said that.
On blogs and talk shows, the issue had legs. The image of another ***** wide receiver running around in No. 80 was just too weird not to generate interest. Even Rice weighed in and kept the story going, by giving his blessing if Bruce wanted to wear the number.
Rice, however, was only doing what Steve Largent had done for him when Rice signed with Seattle in 2004. Back then, I ripped Rice for accepting Largent's offer to wear No. 80 for the Seahawks, speculating what it would be like if Isaac Bruce came to the ***** and asked permission to do the same thing.
I'm not prescient: I even scoffed at that scenario because, as I wrote then, "the John York ***** would never sign a player as prominent as Bruce." I didn't factor in two developments: that York would start spending free-agent money and that Bruce wouldn't be quite as prominent.
But I received an angry phone call in response to that column from Rice's wife, Jackie. It turned out that the Seahawks had engineered the idea, contacting Largent and presenting Rice with a No. 80 Seahawks jersey as a done deal.
In any case, Largent's gesture registered with Rice. As he said at the time, "If somewhere down the road that should happen with me, I'm going to do the same thing. Because of him."
Now we are somewhere down the road. Besides following Largent's generous example, Rice might have had an ulterior motive. By offering up No. 80 to Bruce, Rice has issued a public reminder that jersey No. 80 still hasn't been retired by the *****.
Rice's career ended in training camp of 2005 with Denver. He will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in two years. If you could retire only two ***** jerseys, they would be No. 16 and No. 80. Joe Montana's number was retired in 1997, three years after he stopped playing. Rice is still waiting.
It might be that Rice's legacy rests in the hands of people who aren't sure what to do with it. The current ***** have managed to ignore tradition, alienate homegrown legends and allow their heritage to rot.
One could argue that jersey numbers don't really mean much. But they do for the *****. The present is in such a sorry state and the achievements of the past are the only thing worth preserving.
Thankfully, No. 80 won't be on anyone else's back. Now it's time to put it up on the wall.
|
We're gonna miss ya, Reverend. But we are Rams fans FIRST and player fans second.
__________________
RnD
GO RAMS!!
|

-14-03-2008
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,230
Rep Power: 3
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Hopefully we retire his number as a Ram.
|

-15-03-2008
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cali
Age: 43
Posts: 3,162
Rep Power: 15
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Quote:
|
No 49er in his right mind would ever consider donning No. 80, but Bruce never said that.
|
Thats because he is NOT a 49er!
__________________
Chris Long DE Height: 6-4 Weight: 284
|

-16-03-2008
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
Age: 25
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 3
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
God I hate Ann Killion. Someone should get a clue, tie it to a brick, and throw it through her window, because it doesn't seem she'll get one otherwise. As an added bonus, maybe it'll hit her in the head, too.
|

-19-03-2008
|
 |
Veteran Ram
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 519
Rep Power: 2
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Yes, we need to retire # 80.
|

-20-03-2008
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Looks like Ike will be wearing #88 in the red and gold...
Quote:
|
Jersey numbers have been chosen by Isaac Bruce and Bryant Johnson. Bruce will be wearing #88, and Johnson will be wearing #82.
|
|

-20-03-2008
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,343
Rep Power: 9
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Does that mean that Freddie Solomon fans are going to be pissed?
|

-20-03-2008
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Re: Isaac Bruce won't be wearing No. 80
Absolutely!
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 AM.
|
|
|