Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    general counsel's Avatar
    general counsel is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    atlanta, georgia
    Age
    52
    Posts
    5,576
    Rep Power
    81

    The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    Great great trade for the jets. huge upside, no downside at all.

    ramming speed to all

    general counsel



  2. #2
    tomahawk247's Avatar
    tomahawk247 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Essex, England
    Age
    27
    Posts
    4,664
    Rep Power
    57

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    I was quite surprised the Redskins gave him up for so little, i thought they were asking for a fourth

  3. #3
    RamsFan16's Avatar
    RamsFan16 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    5,072
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    Yea. The reason we didn't get him is because Frerotte is Linehans' man!
    RamsFan16

  4. #4
    tomahawk247's Avatar
    tomahawk247 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Essex, England
    Age
    27
    Posts
    4,664
    Rep Power
    57

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    Id still much rather have Frerotte though. Having a guy that already knows the system and who wouldnt cost a draft pick is better then trading for a guy who would be coming in and having to learn

  5. #5
    Aquitted Killer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    Quote Originally Posted by tomahawk247
    Id still much rather have Frerotte though. Having a guy that already knows the system and who wouldnt cost a draft pick is better then trading for a guy who would be coming in and having to learn
    No doubt.

    I'm kinda suprised that the Raiders didn't go after him at all. Looks like they'll be stuck with Brooks now.

  6. #6
    fred10licious's Avatar
    fred10licious is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    CALI
    Age
    29
    Posts
    63
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    the best part is freotte knows his role, to back up bulger. ramsey had a problem w/ being the back up to brunell in WAS this is WIN WIN WIN for the jets, skins and rams

  7. #7
    Bruce=GOAT's Avatar
    Bruce=GOAT is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,110
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    The Raiders will be screwed with Brooks as their starter and I am so glad that Ramsey is not on our team. Frerotte is a lot better than that scrub. I feel sorry for the Jets as always.

  8. #8
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    31
    Posts
    19,340
    Rep Power
    153

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    We haven't seen much from Ramsey, but ask me again in April when that sixth round pick comes around, and we'll see what QBs are available at that spot.
    ClanRam ModCast: Episode Two
    Rams Discussion Right at Your Fingertips!



  9. #9
    moklerman's Avatar
    moklerman is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,597
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: The jets stole ramsey for a #6

    I agree that Ramsey is an unproven commodity at this point. While unproven, he's still got starting experience in the NFL so it's a good pickup for the Jets but not one that I'd want for the Rams.

    As far as the Raiders being "screwed" if they go with Brooks, I'd have to disagree. As much as I'm not a fan of Brooks, he's a big improvement over Collins.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •