Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,954
    Rep Power
    74

    Memo a sign of progress for NFL moving back to L.A.

    The league memo from Commissioner Roger Goodell regarding the conditions of moving a team to Los Angeles is well worth a read. Obtained by NFL Network's Steve Wyche on Friday, the document leaves one clear impression: The NFL is making real progress in moving back to Los Angeles.

    The document laid forth the ground rules for applying to relocate to Los Angeles as soon as 2013. That doesn't mean there are any teams ready to move so soon, but this is a sign the league feels confident the city is finally ready. Here's the key passage:

    "Stadium development in Los Angeles has advanced to the point where the prospects for a new facility are better than they have been in many years," the memo read.

    Things are truly moving forward. The league is trying to make sure it controls the process of a team possibly moving.

    We don't know what teams could possibly move, but fans in San Diego particularly can't feel too comfortable.


  2. #2
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,233
    Rep Power
    127

    Re: Memo a sign of progress for NFL moving back to L.A.

    Still no stadium or even a site. Some of the plans I have seen for a new state of the art facility in LA are absolutely amazing, but that's all they are at this point, a plan. That said, there are a few groups that claim they are ready to move forward without any public money. Guess we'll see.

  3. #3
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,954
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Memo a sign of progress for NFL moving back to L.A.

    NEW YORK -- Sensing for the first time in years that stadium issues are solvable in Los Angeles, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has established guidelines for a franchise's potential move to the area.

    In a memo sent by the commissioner Friday and obtained by The Associated Press, Goodell said no single team has any "presumptive right" to play in Los Angeles and that only the league as a whole can make a decision on relocation. The league is satisfied with its current 32-team setup, although expanding to include one -- or two -- teams in L.A. is still possible.

    Goodell said no single team has any "presumptive right" to play in Los Angeles and that only the league as a whole can make a decision on relocation. The league is satisfied with its current 32-team setup, although expanding to include one -- or two -- teams in LA is still possible

    Any franchise interested in relocating there for the 2013 season must apply between Jan. 1 and Feb. 15 of that year, and prove it has exhausted all attempts to remain in its current location. No plans are yet in place if no teams apply for 2013.

    Goodell emphasized that any new stadium must be capable of hosting two franchises. Two groups currently are competing to develop a stadium complex, one downtown and one in City of Industry.

    "Given that simultaneous league-wide investment in two stadiums in the same community is unlikely," Goodell wrote, "we believe that the best approach will be a single site where an iconic facility could credibly both host two teams and provide ancillary entertainment and development opportunities."

    Los Angeles has not had an NFL team since the Rams moved to St. Louis and the Raiders went back to Oakland in 1995.

    The Los Angeles Times first reported details of the memo.

    Any new stadium in the L.A. area would be attractive to franchises that struggle at the gate, are located in a smaller metropolitan area or are saddled with a bad lease in an outdated stadium. Among the teams that have been mentioned as potentially moving have been the Jacksonville Jaguars, San Diego Chargers, Buffalo Bills, St. Louis Rams and the Raiders.

    The NFL itself would love a showcase stadium where it could regularly hold Super Bowls.

    Goodell even mentioned in the memo a Hall of Fame, studios for NFL Network and youth football facilities accompanying a stadium.

    The commissioner wrote that any team seeking to move to L.A. must show it "has secured a long-term stadium solution that is financeable and preserves the league's option for use as a two-team facility."

    That team also must have a viable interim stadium plan while the new building is being built; a marketing plan with respect to personal seat licenses, premium seating, and naming rights; and must give certain financial guarantees to the league.

    http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nfl/s...elocation-memo


    2013 season must apply between Jan. 1 and Feb. 15 of that year, and prove it has exhausted all attempts to remain in its current location.
    The Rams will be done with arbitration; deadline is Dec. 31

Similar Threads

  1. Moving Back Into The First Round
    By rams_man13 in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: -03-07-2009, 03:46 PM
  2. Rams OT win is a sign of progress
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -12-26-2006, 08:43 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-25-2006, 09:41 PM
  4. Arch moving back to SS !!
    By maineram in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: -08-24-2005, 12:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •