| ClanRam |
|
|
| 9/7 |
Eagles |
L |
3 - 38 |
| 9/14 |
Giants |
L |
13-41 |
| 9/21 |
Seahawks |
L |
13-37 |
| 9/28 |
Bills |
L |
14-31 |
| 10/5 |
BYE |
|
| 10/12 |
Redskins |
W |
19-17 |
| 10/19 |
Cowboys |
W |
34-14 |
| 10/26 |
Patriots |
L |
16-23 |
| 11/10 |
Cardinals |
L |
13-34 |
| 11/10 |
Jets |
L |
3-47 |
| 11/16 |
Whiners |
L |
16-35 |
| 11/23 |
Bears |
L |
3-27 |
| 11/30 |
Dolphins |
L |
12-16 |
| 12/7 |
Cardinals |
L |
10-34 |
| 12/14 |
Seahawks |
L |
20-23 |
| 12/21 |
Whiners |
L |
16-17 |
| 12/28 |
Falcons |
L |
27-31 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Notices |
This site is for All Rams fans, the world over.
Please register now, for free, and benefit for new features that only come with being a registered member of the ClanRam |
|
View Poll Results: Who should be NFL MVP?
|
|
Boston, AZ - 1,413 yds, 6 TD
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Warner, STL - 4,191 yds, 99.2 rating, 30 TD
|
  
|
8 |
53.33% |
|
Stewart, PIT - 2,786 yds, 86.8 rating, 11 TD
|
  
|
1 |
6.67% |
|
Gannon, OAK - 3,291 yds, 97.4 rating, 24 TD
|
  
|
1 |
6.67% |
|
Favre, GB - 3,439 yds, 94.1 rating, 30 TD
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Holmes, KC - 1,347 yds, 7 TD
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Martin, NYJ - 1,340 yds, 10 TD
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
Faulk, STL - 1,096 yds, 8 TD
|
|
4 |
26.67% |
|
Urlacher, CHI - 98 tackles, 5.0 sacks
|
|
1 |
6.67% |
|
Strahan, NYG - 17.0 sacks, 58 tackles
|
|
0 |
0% |
 |
-27-12-2001
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,882
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Mvp??
Who should be the NFL MVP this season?
|
-29-12-2001
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 45
Posts: 5,570
Rep Power: 24
|
|
|
Warner has had a great year, no question. But in the overall scheme of things, Urlacher had been a monster.
__________________
Why do people say "I don't mean to interrupt BUT". If you don't mean to interrupt, don't interrupt.
|
-29-12-2001
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,882
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
What I think his a travesty is that Kordell is getting rumors to be MVP, LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS!! His team's doing better, but come on...
|
-30-12-2001
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 597
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
Gannon
I hate to go against a Ram, but Gannon has meant more to his team than anybody else. If we are going by stats then it is Warner, even though his interceptions are high for an MVP(the thumb). But without Gannon the Raiders would be in a world of hurt. They are strugling right now and that's with Gannon. So I believe they would have been out of the play-off race a while back if it wasn't for him.
|
-30-12-2001
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vienna - Austria - EUROPE
Age: 31
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Warner
Beeing a RAM's FAN, gives me no other chance:
MVP: K.Warner
but I'm still worried about the number of INTERCEPTIONS thrown! :upset:
|
-31-12-2001
|
 |
Veteran Ram
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: cumbria, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 553
Rep Power: 13
|
|
|
Gotta go with kurt. He is so good people expect high stats and often dismiss his greatness. But that he is.
__________________
I WANT COOKIE! THAT ONE!
|
-31-12-2001
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 597
Rep Power: 8
|
|
What was I thinking
Gannon....what was I thinking? I have seen the error of my ways after yesterday. Maybe I just have been spoiled these last few years watching Warner and Faulk that I have forgotten how great these guys really are. No more say I. But is the MVP Warner or Faulk; Faulk or Warner...I just don't know. Ah, here's the answer...the 2001 MVP....Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk. Hey, why not? That way all Ram fans go home happy. 
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 AM.
|
