View Poll Results: Who should be NFL MVP?
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
Boston, AZ - 1,413 yds, 6 TD
0 0% -
Warner, STL - 4,191 yds, 99.2 rating, 30 TD
8 53.33% -
Stewart, PIT - 2,786 yds, 86.8 rating, 11 TD
1 6.67% -
Gannon, OAK - 3,291 yds, 97.4 rating, 24 TD
1 6.67% -
Favre, GB - 3,439 yds, 94.1 rating, 30 TD
0 0% -
Holmes, KC - 1,347 yds, 7 TD
0 0% -
Martin, NYJ - 1,340 yds, 10 TD
0 0% -
Faulk, STL - 1,096 yds, 8 TD
4 26.67% -
Urlacher, CHI - 98 tackles, 5.0 sacks
1 6.67% -
Strahan, NYG - 17.0 sacks, 58 tackles
0 0%
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Mvp??
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks-
-12-27-2001 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Posts
- 1,882
- Rep Power
- 0
Mvp??
Who should be the NFL MVP this season?
DJRamFan
ClanRam Fantasy Football Commissioner
2003 & 2004 ClanRam Cup Champion
ClanRam
LONG LIVE MIKE MARTZ
NFL Champions: 1945, 1951
NFC Champions: 1979, 1999, 2001
Division Champions: 1945, 1949-1951, 1955, 1967, 1969, 1973-1979, 1985, 1999, 2001, 2003
Super Bowl XXXIV Champions
-
-12-28-2001 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Poplar Bluff, MO
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 7,266
- Rep Power
- 64
Warner has had a great year, no question. But in the overall scheme of things, Urlacher had been a monster.
-
-12-29-2001 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Posts
- 1,882
- Rep Power
- 0
What I think his a travesty is that Kordell is getting rumors to be MVP, LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS!! His team's doing better, but come on...
DJRamFan
ClanRam Fantasy Football Commissioner
2003 & 2004 ClanRam Cup Champion
ClanRam
LONG LIVE MIKE MARTZ
NFL Champions: 1945, 1951
NFC Champions: 1979, 1999, 2001
Division Champions: 1945, 1949-1951, 1955, 1967, 1969, 1973-1979, 1985, 1999, 2001, 2003
Super Bowl XXXIV Champions
-
-12-30-2001 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 597
- Rep Power
- 12
Gannon
I hate to go against a Ram, but Gannon has meant more to his team than anybody else. If we are going by stats then it is Warner, even though his interceptions are high for an MVP(the thumb). But without Gannon the Raiders would be in a world of hurt. They are strugling right now and that's with Gannon. So I believe they would have been out of the play-off race a while back if it wasn't for him.
Sprtsmac :football:
-
-12-30-2001 #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Vienna - Austria - EUROPE
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 1
- Rep Power
- 0
Warner
Beeing a RAM's FAN, gives me no other chance:
MVP: K.Warner
but I'm still worried about the number of INTERCEPTIONS thrown! :upset:
-
-12-31-2001 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- cumbria, UK
- Age
- 40
- Posts
- 823
- Rep Power
- 27
Gotta go with kurt. He is so good people expect high stats and often dismiss his greatness. But that he is.
The Breakfast Club. You want cheese with that?
-
-12-31-2001 #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 597
- Rep Power
- 12
What was I thinking
Gannon....what was I thinking? I have seen the error of my ways after yesterday. Maybe I just have been spoiled these last few years watching Warner and Faulk that I have forgotten how great these guys really are. No more say I. But is the MVP Warner or Faulk; Faulk or Warner...I just don't know. Ah, here's the answer...the 2001 MVP....Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk. Hey, why not? That way all Ram fans go home happy.
Sprtsmac :football:
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks