Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    RamFan_Til_I_Die's Avatar
    RamFan_Til_I_Die is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,152
    Rep Power
    69

    Owners to focus on integrity issues

    NEW YORK (AP) -- Seven months after Spygate, integrity is still a fundamental issue for NFL owners.

    When owners, team officials and coaches gather for the annual spring meetings in Palm Beach, Fla. on Monday, the league's image will be a key component of several issues discussed.

    "We are determined that our game is clean and competitively fair," Ray Anderson, the league's senior vice president for football operations, said during a conference call on Wednesday. "We want integrity from top to bottom."

    Much of the agenda stems from Spygate, the episode in which a New England Patriots' employee made tapes of the New York Jets' defensive signals during the opening regular-season game. Patriots coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 for that; the team was fined $250,000 and lost its first-round draft pick.

    There also will be continued discussion of labor issues. Several owners have indicated recently the league is ready to opt out next November from the agreement that was extended in March 2006.

    That, however, is for the future. Integrity is now.

    Three weeks ago, in a letter to the competition committee, commissioner Roger Goodell proposed strengthening enforcement procedures for next season.

    While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.

    Anderson noted improved technology will allow the league to more easily monitor and detect cheating. He also wants the standard of proof to be the same used in civil cases -- preponderance of the evidence -- rather than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" needed in criminal cases.

    Spygate fallout also is evident in a proposed rule change that would allow defensive players to receive signals from the sidelines through a radio in their helmets. On offense, quarterbacks already receive radio signals from the sidelines.

    A similar proposal was rejected last year, getting 20 votes, two short of the 24 needed for enactment.

    Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee, said the impetus from Spygate could help get the addition two votes.

    A third change with ethical ramifications would institute a five-to-seven day period before the start of free agency during which agents could contact teams about prospective free agents. No signings or contact with players would be allowed, but it would avoid what most league officials concede is widespread illegal negotiation before free agency starts. Earlier this week, San Francisco forfeited its fifth-round draft choice this year for "tampering" with Chicago linebacker Lance Briggs.

    McKay and Anderson, a former agent, both conceded tampering occurs.

    "There's always been quite a bit of activity in the agent community," Anderson said.

    "I think it will help the teams to retain their current players if they want to," McKay said. "It will allow them to know what the market is and make a competitive offer to keep a player they want to keep."

    Other proposals include:

    --Changing the rule on seeding in the playoffs, in part to try to avoid teams sitting regulars at the end of the season if it has already clinched its seeding. Division winners would qualify automatically, and the two winners with the best record would get first-round byes. But a wild-card team could play at home in the first round if it has a better record than the division winner it will play.

    --The college option on the coin toss, allowing teams to defer taking the ball until the second half.

    -- Ending the forceout rule on receptions and interceptions. Currently, the play stands if a player is forced out of bounds making a catch. If changed, a player must get both feet down in bounds.

    --Banning players from having hair below the name tag on their backs.

    --Eliminating the five-yard "incidental facemask" penalty. Grabbing the facemask and turning it would lead to an automatic 15-yard penalty.

    --Instant replay on field-goal attempts. It was proposed in part because of a game last season in which a game-tying field goal against Baltimore appeared to have hit the crossbar and bounced back on the field. It was eventually ruled to have hit the support stanchion behind the goal post and was good. The Browns went on to win in overtime.


  2. #2
    Keenum's Avatar
    Keenum is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,865
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

    Eliminating the 5-yard facemask, college football is doing that.
    But you do want to keep the 15-yarder.

    I would like to see them get rid of the horse-collar tackle as well (NCAA is doing that as well). They are taking away the things you can do to tackle people. Yeah it's a bit dangerous, but FOOTBALL is dangerous.

  3. #3
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

    Oh, these are the same owners who allow their HC's to film the signals of the other team, who actively pursue FA's when they shouldn't, who are attempting to send the NFL into a lockout in two years or so if the CBA isn't ratified in their behalf.

    Boy, glad they are "cleaning up their act".

  4. #4
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,455
    Rep Power
    128

    Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

    While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.
    If Goodell thinks it's such a good idea, why doesn't he give Matt Walsh protection now? I wonder how Robert Kraft will vote on this.

    Ending the forceout rule on receptions and interceptions. Currently, the play stands if a player is forced out of bounds making a catch. If changed, a player must get both feet down in bounds.
    I guess this would get rid of any "would the player have come down in bounds" questions, but what happens when a leaping receiver is tackled and run 3 or 4 yards across the field and then out of bounds while still in the air?

    Banning players from having hair below the name tag on their backs.
    Wow, a hair rule? This should go over well with the NFLPA.

  5. #5
    ramsanddodgers's Avatar
    ramsanddodgers is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Arroyo Grande, CA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,258
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

    A similar proposal was rejected last year, getting 20 votes, two short of the 24 needed for enactment.

    Too many concussions? 24-2=20?!?
    RnD

    GO RAMS!!

  6. #6
    laram0's Avatar
    laram0 is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,221
    Rep Power
    108

    Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

    Quote Originally Posted by RamFan_Til_I_Die View Post
    NEW YORK (AP) --

    Other proposals include:

    --Changing the rule on seeding in the playoffs, in part to try to avoid teams sitting regulars at the end of the season if it has already clinched its seeding. Division winners would qualify automatically, and the two winners with the best record would get first-round byes. But a wild-card team could play at home in the first round if it has a better record than the division winner it will play.
    I think I heard or read somewhere that this proposed change was shot down?

    I was hoping it would get passed. It makes perfect sense to me especially from a fantasy sports perspective.

LinkBacks (?)


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -03-08-2006, 01:07 AM
  2. NFL owners reject players' union proposal
    By Rambos in forum NFL TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -03-02-2006, 04:28 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -02-27-2006, 10:15 PM
  4. Bush has a majority of baseball owners' support
    By DJRamFan in forum OTHER SPORTS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-13-2004, 04:28 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -03-25-2002, 07:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •