All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.
Home Contact Us FAQ

ClanRam
header
round 1
round 2
round 3
round 4
round4b


Go Back   The ClanRam Forums > THE 2007 SEASON > NFL TALK

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old -27-03-2008
RamFan_Til_I_Die's Avatar
RamFan_Til_I_Die
Status: Online
Ram MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 31
Posts: 1,342
Rep Power: 12
RamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to beholdRamFan_Til_I_Die is a splendid one to behold
Owners to focus on integrity issues

NEW YORK (AP) -- Seven months after Spygate, integrity is still a fundamental issue for NFL owners.

When owners, team officials and coaches gather for the annual spring meetings in Palm Beach, Fla. on Monday, the league's image will be a key component of several issues discussed.

"We are determined that our game is clean and competitively fair," Ray Anderson, the league's senior vice president for football operations, said during a conference call on Wednesday. "We want integrity from top to bottom."

Much of the agenda stems from Spygate, the episode in which a New England Patriots' employee made tapes of the New York Jets' defensive signals during the opening regular-season game. Patriots coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 for that; the team was fined $250,000 and lost its first-round draft pick.

There also will be continued discussion of labor issues. Several owners have indicated recently the league is ready to opt out next November from the agreement that was extended in March 2006.

That, however, is for the future. Integrity is now.

Three weeks ago, in a letter to the competition committee, commissioner Roger Goodell proposed strengthening enforcement procedures for next season.

While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.

Anderson noted improved technology will allow the league to more easily monitor and detect cheating. He also wants the standard of proof to be the same used in civil cases -- preponderance of the evidence -- rather than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" needed in criminal cases.

Spygate fallout also is evident in a proposed rule change that would allow defensive players to receive signals from the sidelines through a radio in their helmets. On offense, quarterbacks already receive radio signals from the sidelines.

A similar proposal was rejected last year, getting 20 votes, two short of the 24 needed for enactment.

Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee, said the impetus from Spygate could help get the addition two votes.

A third change with ethical ramifications would institute a five-to-seven day period before the start of free agency during which agents could contact teams about prospective free agents. No signings or contact with players would be allowed, but it would avoid what most league officials concede is widespread illegal negotiation before free agency starts. Earlier this week, San Francisco forfeited its fifth-round draft choice this year for "tampering" with Chicago linebacker Lance Briggs.

McKay and Anderson, a former agent, both conceded tampering occurs.

"There's always been quite a bit of activity in the agent community," Anderson said.

"I think it will help the teams to retain their current players if they want to," McKay said. "It will allow them to know what the market is and make a competitive offer to keep a player they want to keep."

Other proposals include:

--Changing the rule on seeding in the playoffs, in part to try to avoid teams sitting regulars at the end of the season if it has already clinched its seeding. Division winners would qualify automatically, and the two winners with the best record would get first-round byes. But a wild-card team could play at home in the first round if it has a better record than the division winner it will play.

--The college option on the coin toss, allowing teams to defer taking the ball until the second half.

-- Ending the forceout rule on receptions and interceptions. Currently, the play stands if a player is forced out of bounds making a catch. If changed, a player must get both feet down in bounds.

--Banning players from having hair below the name tag on their backs.

--Eliminating the five-yard "incidental facemask" penalty. Grabbing the facemask and turning it would lead to an automatic 15-yard penalty.

--Instant replay on field-goal attempts. It was proposed in part because of a game last season in which a game-tying field goal against Baltimore appeared to have hit the crossbar and bounced back on the field. It was eventually ruled to have hit the support stanchion behind the goal post and was good. The Browns went on to win in overtime.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old -27-03-2008
Keenum's Avatar
Keenum
Status: Online
Ram MVP
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Age: 19
Posts: 1,130
Rep Power: 7
Keenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of lightKeenum is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Eliminating the 5-yard facemask, college football is doing that.
But you do want to keep the 15-yarder.

I would like to see them get rid of the horse-collar tackle as well (NCAA is doing that as well). They are taking away the things you can do to tackle people. Yeah it's a bit dangerous, but FOOTBALL is dangerous.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old -27-03-2008
txramsfan's Avatar
txramsfan
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 5,888
Rep Power: 22
txramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud of
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Oh, these are the same owners who allow their HC's to film the signals of the other team, who actively pursue FA's when they shouldn't, who are attempting to send the NFL into a lockout in two years or so if the CBA isn't ratified in their behalf.

Boy, glad they are "cleaning up their act".
__________________
Ashley Simpson called Brittney Spears trash. Glad she cleared that up for us. I was awake every night wondering the same thing.
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

  #4 (permalink)  
Old -28-03-2008
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 48
Posts: 4,212
Rep Power: 23
r8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant future
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Quote:
While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.
If Goodell thinks it's such a good idea, why doesn't he give Matt Walsh protection now? I wonder how Robert Kraft will vote on this.

Quote:
Ending the forceout rule on receptions and interceptions. Currently, the play stands if a player is forced out of bounds making a catch. If changed, a player must get both feet down in bounds.
I guess this would get rid of any "would the player have come down in bounds" questions, but what happens when a leaping receiver is tackled and run 3 or 4 yards across the field and then out of bounds while still in the air?

Quote:
Banning players from having hair below the name tag on their backs.
Wow, a hair rule? This should go over well with the NFLPA.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -28-03-2008
ramsanddodgers's Avatar
ramsanddodgers
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,573
Rep Power: 10
ramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to beholdramsanddodgers is a splendid one to behold
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Quote:
A similar proposal was rejected last year, getting 20 votes, two short of the 24 needed for enactment.

Too many concussions? 24-2=20?!?
__________________
RnD

GO RAMS!!



Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -02-04-2008
laram0's Avatar
laram0
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 51
Posts: 4,584
Rep Power: 18
laram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud oflaram0 has much to be proud of
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamFan_Til_I_Die View Post
NEW YORK (AP) --

Other proposals include:

--Changing the rule on seeding in the playoffs, in part to try to avoid teams sitting regulars at the end of the season if it has already clinched its seeding. Division winners would qualify automatically, and the two winners with the best record would get first-round byes. But a wild-card team could play at home in the first round if it has a better record than the division winner it will play.
I think I heard or read somewhere that this proposed change was shot down?

I was hoping it would get passed. It makes perfect sense to me especially from a fantasy sports perspective.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFL Owners Still Considering Latest Union Proposal RamsFan16 NFL TALK 0 -08-03-2006 06:07 AM
NFL owners reject players' union proposal Rambos NFL TALK 0 -02-03-2006 09:28 PM
NFL | Owners tentatively scheduled to meet Tuesday RamsFan16 NFL TALK 0 -28-02-2006 03:15 AM
Bush has a majority of baseball owners' support DJRamFan OTHER SPORTS 0 -13-09-2004 09:28 PM
NFL Owners Say They Won't Buy Stake in Arena Football League DJRamFan ARENA 0 -26-03-2002 12:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.


ClanRam
header
ticket booth
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
Maddux Sports
Offers expert NFL Picks
against NFL betting lines
bar
bar
bar
bar
advertise
 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
ClanRam.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the St Louis Rams or the NFL (National Football League). All content within this Rams fan page is provided by, and for, Rams fans. Copyright © ClanRam.comAd Management by RedTyger