throwback week



Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,072
    Rep Power
    131

    Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    By John Clayton
    ESPN.com

    Apparently, the NFL is serious about putting safety first at this year's owners meeting.

    Owners passed four safety proposals Tuesday morning, a full day before they normally pass any rules involving action on the field. In past meetings, owners usually wait until Wednesdays to debate and vote on rule changes involving the game. The Competition Committee makes its annual report to owners on Monday, giving supporters or opponents an extra day to lobby for votes.

    When it came to safety this year, there was apparently no debate. Starting this fall, the NFL is going to outlaw the "wedge" on kickoffs, stop the bunching of players on onside kicks, protect blockers from a helmet-to-helmet hit from the blindside and save receivers from forearm or shoulder hits to the head when they appear to be defenseless.

    "We're trying to make the game safer for the guy getting hit and the guy doing the hitting," said officiating director Mike Pereira, who plans to retire this year.

    The safety change for the onside kick may seem to be a minor adjustment, but it became more important when the Competition Committee watched tape of violent collisions on onside kicks.

    In recent years, the league has tried to make onside kicks safer. Special teams coaches, however, found ways around those changes to group more players in smaller areas to gain an advantage. Under the new rule, players on the kickoff team will be spaced accordingly. First, at least four players of the kicking team must be on each side of the kicker. Second, at least three players must be lined up outside each inbounds line, including one who must be outside the yard-line number.

    The "wedge" has been part of kickoff returns seemingly forever. The wedge is simply three players lined up in a blocking triangle that a returner follows as it plows up the field against kickoff coverage. After watching years of tape, the Competition Committee felt the wedge was causing too many injuries. Starting this fall, no more than two receiver team players may intentionally form a wedge to help the returner. The penalty is 15 yards and will be enforced from the spot of the wedge. It will be called if three or more players line up shoulder to shoulder within two yards of each other to lead the blocking.

    The third accepted proposal involves a play in which Pittsburgh Steelers receiver Hines Ward made a block that resulted in a broken jaw for Cincinnati Bengals linebacker Keith Rivers. A 15-yard penalty will be enforced if a player delivers a blindside block to the head of a defender using his helmet, forearm or shoulder. The penalty will be enforced if a helmet, shoulder or forearm strikes the head or neck of the defender.

    The final change adds forearm and shoulder hits to protect defenseless receivers. In the past, officials gave an unnecessary roughness penalty to a defender if he delivered a helmet hit to a receiver going across the middle of the field or any spot on the field in which he appeared to be defenseless. Starting this fall, the penalty will also apply if the defender hits the defenseless receiver in the head or neck with his forearm or shoulder.

    "Our clear movement is to getting out of the striking in the head area," Pereira said. "We're reading about injuries that say spinal and vertebrae. We've got to try something."

    Also, defenders who are knocked to the ground no longer can lunge into quarterbacks if the play is still going on. Kansas City safety Bernard Pollard did just that on the hit that ended Tom Brady's season almost before it began, and Pereira placed such plays in the player safety category.

    That adjustment was not a rule change and did not require an owners vote.

    Pereira was dismayed by the lack of progress in curbing horse-collar tackles. There were 24 called in 2008, up from 12, but there also were 47 league fines handed out for them.

    "That's just too high a number," he said. "We have not been effective in terms of stopping the tactic."

    Such tackles will be a point of emphasis with officiating crews in 2009.

    So will holding penalties, on which the variance of calls from crew to crew has been huge. Pereira's office is compiling a tape that will be shown to officials, coaching staffs and players.

    "It's one area we need to find consistency from crew to crew," he said.

    Asked about the ratings for each crew last year, Pereira said they averaged 98.1 percent accuracy, down slightly from 98.3 in 2007. Naturally, he wants that number as close to 100 percent as possible.

    "We had some train wrecks and train wrecks hurt you," he said, referring to Ed Hoculi's blown call on Jay Cutler's fumble in a Week 2 game between Denver and San Diego, and to the Week 11 win by Pittsburgh over San Diego 11-10 in which a late Steelers touchdown wrongly was negated. "They hurt perception. It was hard getting through Week 2. That's what we have to avoid this year."

    The owners could make that easier by passing a rule allowing video replay to be used to determine whether a play similar to Cutler's is an incomplete pass or a fumble. That vote is expected Wednesday


  2. #2
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    In another development, the NFL is putting skirts around all offensive players and tying one hand behind every defenders back in order to protect the QB.

    I hate every rule that was changed. No wonder players form Austrailian Rules Football or real Rugby players think American football is for sissies.

  3. #3
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,072
    Rep Power
    131

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    I hear you Tx. It's getting absolutely rediculous with all the restrictions on the defensive side of the ball. Soon we can look forward to QB's being off limits for ANY contact. Tom Brady gets injured and the league goes into panic mode. I can only imagine the huge number of penalties that are going to be called in 2009 with the contact restrictions and emphesis on holding. Didn't the NFL want to speed UP games??

  4. #4
    RamWraith's Avatar
    RamWraith is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Minnesota
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,230
    Rep Power
    61

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    I miss the game of football!! Might as well be playing basketball.

  5. #5
    laram0's Avatar
    laram0 is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,312
    Rep Power
    109

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    Quote Originally Posted by r8rh8rmike View Post
    I hear you Tx. It's getting absolutely rediculous with all the restrictions on the defensive side of the ball. Soon we can look forward to QB's being off limits for ANY contact. Tom Brady gets injured and the league goes into panic mode. I can only imagine the huge number of penalties that are going to be called in 2009 with the contact restrictions and emphesis on holding. Didn't the NFL want to speed UP games??
    I knew when Tom (tommy boy) Brady went down there would be a rule change. That was a clean hit in my opinion. My question is when will the league make the announcement that we are going to 2 hand touch?!

  6. #6
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    Since the Mike and Mike show has Eric K on there this week I was watching it this morning. They did a great parody on the Brady rule. Had some made up DT LOOKED at Brady and got a 5 yard penalty. Then, they said "Now, if he had done a double take look, that would have been 15 yards."

    Wonder what the penalty would be if a DT would have given the Obama Media stare down?


  7. #7
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    32
    Posts
    19,871
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    "We're trying to make the game safer for the guy getting hit and the guy doing the hitting," said officiating director Mike Pereira, who plans to retire this year.
    At this rate, they may as well just eliminate the hitting and strap flags to all the jerseys. Come on, it'll be really safe!

  8. #8
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is offline Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    19,044
    Rep Power
    171

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    The league also announced that the signal for an illegal wedge penalty will require two refs (one grabbing the back of the other's boxers and yanking them up to his shoulders).

  9. #9
    shower beers's Avatar
    shower beers is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,050
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    Quote Originally Posted by AvengerRam View Post
    The league also announced that the signal for an illegal wedge penalty will require two refs (one grabbing the back of the other's boxers and yanking them up to his shoulders).
    Nice.


    I was a little confused to the wedge rule. Why would a technique cause more injuries, when all they are doing is blocking for a returner? They would be doing the same exact thing not matter where they were spaced out, no?

  10. #10
    r8rh8rmike's Avatar
    r8rh8rmike is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29 Palms, Ca.
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,072
    Rep Power
    131

    Re: Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes

    Quote Originally Posted by shower beers View Post
    I was a little confused to the wedge rule. Why would a technique cause more injuries, when all they are doing is blocking for a returner? They would be doing the same exact thing not matter where they were spaced out, no?
    I'm still trying to figure out why players being bunched on an onside kick is dangerous.

Similar Threads

  1. Lenny walls sucks
    By Ahmedrams81 in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: -10-04-2007, 09:54 AM
  2. Jeff Gordon's Game-Day Blog
    By Nick in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-10-2006, 04:29 PM
  3. FOX Fantasy Football is coming!
    By Ram Warrior in forum FANTASY
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -06-21-2006, 12:52 AM
  4. PaRamFan48 Chistmas '99
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -03-18-2006, 11:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •