Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
-10-17-2005 #1
The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
My fantasy team has Marc Bulger as our starting QB and we have no need for any points from him. There is no pressure on Marc to perform this week.
But hey .... he can add some overkill points if he wants to....that could be fun.
The Hammerheads are back in the game ... after two light weeks with losses, a win feels pretty darn good.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-17-2005 #2
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
For my team in my league, I am down by 22, but have MB, Jackson, Holt, and the Colts DEF. Should be a piece of cake.
This space for rent...
-
-10-17-2005 #3
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
I just want to thank the Hammerheads for that "light" win last week.....
-
-10-18-2005 #4
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
I'm the only undefeated team in the league, and you folks are gloating with two losses? Get a grip. What was the sound of one hand clapping again?
-
-10-18-2005 #5
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
Go ahead and act like you are great. You have had the easiest of the schedules. You have the lowest points scored against you with 407. I have 510 scored against the Hammerheads. My team has 29 more offensive points than yours despite two lame weeks.
Originally Posted by adarian_too
You don't have much to brag about Hollow man.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-19-2005 #6
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
Originally Posted by StillUtterlyBlitzed
That’s what I like about number-crunchers; they usually get beans in their mouth while trying to talk smack. Those numbers you cited say that I have the 3rd most potent offense in the league while having the top ranked defense at the same time. Football analysts would call that balanced. You can call that an accounting formula for whipping your asss.
-
-10-19-2005 #7
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
yeah....mmm hmmm top ranked defense, sure thang. This is fantasy adarian....your team has no true defense.
So have you played the Rams defense this year? Or are the still sitting on the bench?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-19-2005 #8
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
I'm feeling generous today. Let's go over the basics one more time shall we.
Originally Posted by UtterBlitz
If I'm winning my match-ups, it is because I have more points than my opponent.
If I have gotten more points than my opponents it is because I have scored more points than them.
If I have scored more points than them, it is because my point total is higher than theirs.
If I have scored more points than them, it is because they couldn't score enough on me. That is defense.
Any questions? I didn't think so. Logic can be so compelling.
I dumped the Rams DST long time ago for a journeyman TE to stand in for Shockey during bye week ... (keep that to yourself please, don't need some of my strategies public ...)
-
-10-19-2005 #9
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
I am sorry. I can't follow your logic this time. Please forgive me, sometimes I am a bit dense.
Originally Posted by adarian_too
I picked up a TE this week also. Heath Miller with the Steelers...pretty good pick up, yes. I finally followed some brotherly advice, which does not happen often.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-19-2005 #10
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
Speaking of logic -
"If you talk to God, you are praying. If God speaks to you, you have a mental disease." - Thomas Szasz, The Second Sin
Which brings me back to the original koan: What IS the sound of one hand clapping?
-
-10-19-2005 #11
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
That would be the sound of someone patting themselves on the back, which would be me.
Originally Posted by adarian_too
Thanks for noticing.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-19-2005 #12
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
Never was a doubt in my mind that you could hang with the big boys in The Hollow. Welcome to Holloween ...
-
-10-19-2005 #13
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
It is getting to be that special ghoulish time of year. Are we having a party?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-
-10-20-2005 #14
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
Originally Posted by UtterBlitz
Point of clarification. Holloween, as opposed to Halloween, is not a singular event. This festivity is divided into two stages. The first runs from April 1 to Oct 31; the second from Oct 31 to April 1. The party has been going on ... and on ...
-
-10-22-2005 #15
Re: The Hammerheads don't need Bulger for a win
And for the next couple also I presume ... but if you do get the man to perform, i'll be impressed with your touch ...
Originally Posted by UtterBlitz




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks