I know it's a little early to be talking about fantasy football but I got my first fantasy football magazine in the mail a few days ago.
The part I don't get is the disrespect that Torry Holt receives.
The top 5 from this mag is
IMO Holt is far and away no. 1 and I don't say that because I'm a RAMS fan.
Stats tell the story
89 rec, 1248 yds, 12 TD's
86 rec, 1201 yds, 12 TD's
108 rec, 1369 yds, 12 TD's
101 rec, 1457 yds, 9 TD's
Now with the exception of Harrison the top two were the only options their respective teams had and Harrison's teammates didn't really pitch in til last season. Holt on the other hand plays among many quality players and yes he is the go to guy but there is plenty of other options for Bulger. How can no one see this. How is he overlooked time after time. On the other side of the field is Bruce (a Pro-Bowler), for the Vikings it was ???, for the Eagles is was Pinkston? and for the Colts it was Wayne or Stoakley. Tell me how is Holt not considered the best receiver in the game. The balance he shows while playing with many Pro-Bowlers and against D's that are constantly trying to stop the RAMS high-potent offense makes me believe without bias that he is the best receiver in the game. He may not be the biggest but he puts up the best numbers overall. He is definately the most underated receiver in the game.
I could throw this gripe in the main forum but since my facts cam from a fantasy mag I figured this was the correct forum.