Results 1 to 15 of 18
-
-05-01-2011 #1
Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
That statement is basically we are going to become an elite team for years to come.
Let me just analysis each pick:
Pick 1: Robert Quinn
What this pick meant: We saw the flashes from Chris Long as a franchise LE now we get our potential RE in Quinn. Quinn has a bevy of pass rush moves if he can shake the rust he is NFL ready right now. Remember Spags with the Giants? He had a aging Starhan and an improving Osi now think about what he can do with similar players just both will reach their prime together and play at a high intensity level together.
How he fits in 2010: Quinn is known as a hard worker so i think pre-season (whenever that is ) will be all he needs to shake the rust. Many think Quinn be a rotational player but i doubt it. I think QUinn will start at RE from Day 1. With James Hall as the rotational DL. Hall will play UT on 3rd down pass rush situations. Quinn will reach his potential by playing.
Pick 2: Lacne Kendricks
My Opinion: I believe Spags and Billy D showed their drafting weakness here. There is a huge drop-off between Kyle Rudolph and Kendricks. Billy D should have made a move to get Rudolph.
What this pick Means: Fendi is not in our plans anymore. Fells will not be back next year. This pick means Josh McD is focused on making Bradford an MVP candidate like he did with Brady. Bradford's favorite option has always been TEs. McD normally lines up with 2 TEs. Now McD can incorporate more routes down the middle with his TEs.
What this means for our Offense: We have Illinois Mike who was drafted as a nice blocking TE. We can line up with both Kendricks and Mike and use Kendricks to move across the line and even line up in the slot and just create mis matches. Kendricks will likely be that deadly red zone target.
Pick 3: Austin Petis
What this pick means: We are moving far away from the WCO and spags has officially gave McD the keys to the entire Offense. We are getting McD type receivers. Regardless of previous articles we will not re-sign Mark Clayton, Donnie Avery better show McD something cuz he is in danger of getting cut. Pettis is our 3rd down receiver.
Pick 4: Greg Salas
Time to gloat: I had Salas as our 4th round pick in my final mock draft. YESSSS!
How our receivers will look: A receiver everyone needs to think about is Brandon Gibson he is a McD type receiver and he can really pluck the ball out of the air. And yes your will hear it here first i think Gibson will be our week 1 starter at WR
WR1: Brandon Gibson
WR2: Greg Salas
WR3: Danny Boy (will play WR2 wen there is no slot)
WR4: Austin Pettis
WR5: Danario Alexander
WR6: Donnie Avery
Salas vs. Alexander for #2 Wr will be an interesting match-up. Pettis will be on the field on 3rd down passing situations.
Pick5: Jermale Hines
Pick 6: Mikail Baker
Pick 7: Jabara Williams
Pick 8: Jonathan Nelson
Our Defense?: Spags seems pretty confident with the players he has. Hines seems like the only one to battle for a starting job.
We are building a Josh McD offense around Sam Bradford. Spags has faith in his D ability so he decides to give McD the talent he needs to succeed offensively. If these picks pan out we can be very dangerous. I mean 1st round playoff bye dangerous.
-
-05-02-2011 #2
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
I'm not sure what you mean here...My Opinion: I believe Spags and Billy D showed their drafting weakness here. There is a huge drop-off between Kyle Rudolph and Kendricks. Billy D should have made a move to get Rudolph.
Kendricks was valued as a second round pick and a top 50 player by many, so it just seems the Rams stuck to their board. I don't think they went into round 2 thinking "we have to get a TE", they just went with their BPA
-
-05-02-2011 #3
-
-05-02-2011 #4
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
I think you are wrong with Fendi --- I think the pick up of Kendricks means Fells is out of a job, not Fendi
-
-05-02-2011 #5
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
-
-05-05-2011 #6
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
Im with you somewhat BarronWade on having faith with Brandon Gibson. I can see some potential but believe he struggles with the mental aspect of learning the position, like Gilyard. Thats why at the start of the season he wasnt even dressed for the games.
Once he gets comfortable with McD offense I think Gibson could very well surprise a few people. I could see he was getting closer and closer to making some good plays, although the bottom line is he didnt make them. Its going to be interesting to see who makes the team at WR with the lockout affecting the time the receivers have to learn the MCD' scheme.?
-
-05-05-2011 #7
-
-05-05-2011 #8
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
Semper Fi
-
-05-05-2011 #9
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
I'm not sure why everyone seems to think Fendi is out at TE, he was contributing last year before his injury so I think as he learns the game (hasn't he been practicing with Bradford and the other receivers?) he'll have a bigger part on the offense especially as they go to more 4WR and 5WR sets. Also I very much doubt Gibson makes the team this year - he's drops hurt him too much last year.
-
-05-05-2011 #10
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
Yea your right with McD every single receiver has a clean slate and needs to prove the he can make an impact on McD wide open offense. Gibby is my bold prediction that is why i had him so highly rated. He has potential and he has shown flashes. Lets see if McD can coach this kid up.
Rudolph is far more superior than Kendricks. Rudolph is taller and a more natural athlete. As far being a reciever both have nice hands but Rudolph has better hands and will catch just about any pass in his vicinity. I think he has a better range than kendricks. Rudolph is also a more reliable option (kendricks is also reliable but rudolph is slightly better. Both are just about the same prospect except Rudolph is slightly better in most categories and heavily better in size and strength.
Let me answer some of your comments:
I will answer the Fendi one in the next quote
Coming out of college Illinois Mike was considered a blocking TE. Billy D did say he is a better receiver than most think we saw his claim work last season. We saw Mike make some spectacular one handed grabs but Illinois Mike made plays last year but he was not a major impact until the redzone offense was there. Most of his touches came in the redzone. We need a more natural pass catcher that is willing to stretch the middle off the field when we are in our own territory. Bajema filled his role well and made some great blocks for Jackson he also caught some passes that we did not expect he would. Bajema fits his role perfectly and that is a blocking TE.
Danny Boy will play the role Wes Welker played in NE. he will play WR2 when there are only 2 wrs on the field then switch to the slot when there are 3 or more. Danny bOy will do what he did last year run those short intermediate routes and have a high reception total.
Out of all our WRs Avery has the most to prove and the biggest chip on his shoulder. He is not a McD type WR so he needs to prove he is a playmaker for McD to work plays for him
Im not sure how you think the guy was contributing last year. 3 games 2 receptions 15 yards which really amounts to nothing. The guy did NOTHING last year. Okay he has huge potential that is why we got him but he should have made a bigger impact look at Jimmy Graham in new orleans he made an impact and is similar to Fendi's situation.
Idk how much people compare him to Gates if he could not get on the field with the TEs we had i dont think he will ever reach his potential.
Somebody tell me given what he did last year (which is really nothing) how does even deserve a chance to make this team? Tell me what he did in college to make you think he will become a good player (11 games 2 receptions 33 yards 1 TD)?
Might as well just pick any random athletic 6-6 small forward in college basketball and tell him he will become a great NFL TE because that is Fendi's story.
-
-05-05-2011 #11
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
I agree with your assessment Barron except that it might take him a bit to work on run defense that His college position coach states he needs to polish up on. Not saying he is far from up but i can honestly say from watching his home games in person that there are some run plays he is overly agressive and takes himself out of making a play. This is just coaching and can be fixed.
p.s. Is this Bradford as good as I have seen from highlights? I'm sorry for my ignorance since I haven't followed the Rams intently until now. If so it seems he can make the TE and the 2 WR taken in this draft pretty good prospects.Last edited by QuinnMan; -05-05-2011 at 08:21 PM.
-
-05-05-2011 #12
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
Honestly i do not think Quinn needs to work on his run D. our coach loves pass rushing DL and i think he would like it if Quinn stays aggressive pursuing the RBs even if he over pursues.
Well Bradford had a great rookie season setting the record for pass attempts while throwing to a bunch of #3 wrs. So yea he is as good as advertised and probably better
-
-05-05-2011 #13
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
Let's put Quinn in there as a two way player to be the #1 WR lol
-
-05-05-2011 #14
-
-05-06-2011 #15
Re: Billy Devaney and Spags made a huge statement with the 2011 Draft!
I think it's a stretch to say that this draft is supposed to make us an elite team for years to come. If we basically felt comfortable with the talent we had on the 19th ranked defense in 2010, that says to me the team is still a work in progress.
I disagree that there is so much of a drop-off between Rudolph and Kendricks. Rudolph's best season in college was 33 receptions, 364 yards, 3 TDs. Kendricks' best was 43, 663, 5. Kendricks has been more productive, doesn't have as many injury concerns, has more impressive workout numbers, and is probably a better blocker. I do agree that this may mean the end of Fells' and Onobun's tenure with the Rams. Fells because he'll be a free agent and Onobun because he was a late round project of the previous offensive coordinator.
While I do think McDaniel is moving away from the WCO, I think Pettis and Salas would have been logical fits for that offense, too. The West Coast Offense most commonly implemented is supposed to be a high percentage, short passing game, which means it's more important that your players can catch the ball than that they have great deep speed.
Similar Threads
-
I have only made this statement once before...
By bruce4life in forum RAM TALKReplies: 6Last Post: -12-26-2010, 05:15 PM -
Draft Talk with Billy Devaney at J Buck's
By TheRammer in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 1Last Post: -02-22-2010, 08:16 PM -
Though the data is limited, the first Devaney/Spags Draft Looks Promising.
By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 8Last Post: -01-13-2010, 08:08 AM -
Billy Devaney Recaps Draft
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 1Last Post: -04-30-2008, 12:25 AM -
Billy Devaney on the Rams Draft
By Nick in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 17Last Post: -03-23-2008, 02:30 PM




1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks