Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    eldfan's Avatar
    eldfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Greenville N.C.
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,655
    Rep Power
    25

    BLOG: Chargers more willing to deal Vincent Jackson?

    Chargers more willing to deal Vincent Jackson?
    by VanRam on Jul 5, 2011 7:12 PM CDT


    Last year, the St. Louis Rams had a long dalliance with Vincent Jackson and the San Diego Chargers. They had a tentative contract agreement in place with Jackson. San Diego sunk the deal by drastically inflating the asking price. Though never confirmed, pundits said that Rams GM Billy Devaney offered a second-round pick and then some. Chargers GM A.J. Smith might be more willing to deal Jackson this year, according to the Chargers' beat guy.

    Prior the lockout, Jackson received the franchise tag from the Chargers. That designation ensures VJ a one-year paycheck north of $10 million. It's worth noting that most believe the next iteration of the Collective Bargaining Agreement being worked out now will honor those franchise tags, since they were long a part of business as usual.

    Why the change of heart (maybe) in San Diego? Kevin Acee, the local beat reporter, doesn't elaborate, but if rumors that the Chargers want to add Panthers' WR Steve Smith, it would apparently make VJ expendable, assuming they retain Malcom Floyd. They also have Antonio Gates and rookie WR Vincent Brown.

    And what about the Rams? McDaniels is pretty committed to the two-TE system this year. Add to that their stable of role playing receivers and young guys looking to finally make their mark, and it means that spare parts types like Plaxico Burress are unlikely targets. Jackson, as you know, is a bona fide number one wide receiver, not a spare part, and only 28-years-old. They were said to be interested in Sidney Rice earlier this offseason, prior to the draft. If they're going to chase after a receiver before the start of the season, only a big time guy like that would make sense.

    I suspect the Rams will not be as willing to swap a second-round pick or the salary dollars needed to make such a move with other roster needs to be addressed.

    :ramlogo:

  2. #2
    AtlantaRamFan's Avatar
    AtlantaRamFan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    832
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: BLOG: Chargers more willing to deal Vincent Jackson?

    He might be playing for different team next year, but it won't be the Rams. Too many other issues to address, and after drafter pass-catchers in the second third and fourth, there is no longer room for another WR. However, since I'm bitter that there GM nixed the trade, I hope they get peanuts for him.

  3. #3
    C-Mob 71's Avatar
    C-Mob 71 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    S. Illinois
    Posts
    1,506
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: BLOG: Chargers more willing to deal Vincent Jackson?

    must resist... have enough wr... cost too much... character concerns...

    Ah what the heck, lets make a trade, I'm not about to jump off the V-Jax bandwagon at this point!

Similar Threads

  1. An appeal to trade for Vincent Jackson.
    By DPskywalker in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: -09-21-2010, 12:22 AM
  2. Please!!!! go get Vincent Jackson
    By 39thebeast in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: -09-20-2010, 01:46 AM
  3. Burwell: Vincent Jackson Could Be Big Deal For Rams
    By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -09-18-2010, 12:25 PM
  4. Vincent Jackson
    By 3STL9 in forum NFL TALK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -09-15-2010, 06:59 PM
  5. Vincent Jackson anyone?
    By sosa39rams in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: -09-01-2010, 12:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •