Printable View
After last season I wanted the Rams to finish near the bottom to have a shot at Sam Bradford. Well now a year later my wish for a franchise QB is a reality. But all I've been hearing about is how Suh is the best DT to come out in decades. Man now I'm really torn. Lets get some discussion going between the two players...
When you hire a defensive coach like Spags, you establish that you are building your team around a defense. Every defense needs a pass rush, and with Suh we can get that as well as a force in the middle to stop the run.
If we could somehow sneak back in to the end of the first round and Bradford is still there, gold.
You gotta take the player that is the closest to a sure thing and that player is Suh.
I believe your right regarding the Rams but history suggest that it does not always work out that way ie....Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rammer
John Gruden in Tampa
Brian B. in Baltimore
Tony Dungy in Indy
Way to many questions with Bradford to even consider him number 1 overall. IMO the question should be Claussen or Suh
I think your wrong. Bradford was the guy until he got hurt. No question. I think the only reason Suh should be picked over Bradford is because of the injury. Claussen doesen't belong in the equation.Quote:
Originally Posted by 39thebeast
Irf we draft Clausen I will throw up .... he's a waste of breath.... take pike in the 2nd.
Yeah. Joe Montana is the only good quarterback to come from Notre Dame. Also, if Clausen can only get a college team to .500, how would he even attempt to lead a professional team?Quote:
Originally Posted by jerseyramsfan
I'm not saying Clausen's not a good QB. I just don't think we would be adding him to the conversation if Bradford was healthy....Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rammer
ND's defense is not very good...
YouTube - Ndamukong Suh Destroys Gabbert!!!
What was the question again? :D
Considering the throws, decisions, and stats clausen puts up..i really dont understand how anyone can say hes not a good quarterback prospect....
As far as the record debate about it is concerned. your defense also has to stop the other team from scoring :)
Clausen is simply a better prospect than Bradford now due to Bradfords significants injuries, experience, and type of offense ran.
*points at the rammer*
I wouldn't take Bradford if he was healthy! The guy has pretty much been untouched throughout his school campaign. The times he got hit, it looked like he died! The system was why Bradford was as good as he was.
Exactly once he starts getting hit he goes down. Toughness is a way underrated quality in the NFL, especially in a QB. Claussen tough as nails played marvelously through a bad injury. As soon as someone lays a finger on Bradford he's out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooselini
It is no coincidence that Peyton manning, Eli Manning, and Brett Farve are all great QBs with superbowl rings and lead in consecutive starts.