Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: g dorsey !!

  1. #1
    dabeerman is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    7
    Rep Power
    0

    g dorsey !!

    after dorseys pro day , it sounds like if c long is gone , dorsey is our guy . what do u think ?


  2. #2
    39thebeast's Avatar
    39thebeast is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    conecticut
    Posts
    2,740
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: g dorsey !!

    I didn't think there was anything special on his pro day testing wise, but his individual drills looked pretty good

  3. #3
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is online now Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    31
    Posts
    19,522
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: g dorsey !!

    If Chris Long is gone, then Dorsey is third on my list behind Gholston and Jake Long.

  4. #4
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is offline Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    18,633
    Rep Power
    168

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    If Chris Long is gone, then Dorsey is third on my list behind Gholston and Jake Long.
    Wait a second...

    Could it be....?

    Nick and I agree 100%!!!!

    My draft board:

    1. C.Long
    2. V.Gholston
    3. J.Long
    4. G.Dorsey

  5. #5
    rams4life88's Avatar
    rams4life88 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    134
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    If Chris Long is gone, then Dorsey is third on my list behind Gholston and Jake Long.
    I'm with Nick on this one.

  6. #6
    Ramer's Avatar
    Ramer is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,026
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: g dorsey !!

    I am also with Nick and AvengerRam.
    1. C.Long
    2. Gholston
    3. J.Long
    4. Dorsey

  7. #7
    39thebeast's Avatar
    39thebeast is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    conecticut
    Posts
    2,740
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Carriker put up way better numbers at the combine and he is similar size just taller. He has also had better career numbers at a similar position. Just putting it out there, but if Carriker played UT all year I think they would put up similar numbers. I really don't think Dorsey is that much better if he is at all. Thats why i would agree on a big board similar to Nick's and AV

  8. #8
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    9,170
    Rep Power
    75

    Re: g dorsey !!

    I think Nick and I agree 100%

    My draft board:

    1. C.Long
    2. J.Long
    3. V.Gholston
    4. G.Dorsey

    I would also hope we traded back if we took V.Gholston or G.Dorsey.

  9. #9
    rams4life88's Avatar
    rams4life88 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    134
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Don't get me wrong, I like Dorsey. But with the past history of Ram's DT's chosen in the 1st round, I'd rather put my money on Gholston or Long.

  10. #10
    Rammed's Avatar
    Rammed is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    408
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Rambos View Post
    I think Nick and I agree 100%

    My draft board:

    1. C.Long
    2. J.Long
    3. V.Gholston
    4. G.Dorsey

    I would also hope we traded back if we took V.Gholston or G.Dorsey.
    That's my man Rambos!

    100%

  11. #11
    TekeRam's Avatar
    TekeRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,879
    Rep Power
    71

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Same as everyone else, though the 2 and 3 positions continually switch. I'm starting to feel Long, Long, Gholston, Dorsey though.

  12. #12
    jkramsfan's Avatar
    jkramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Destin,Fl.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,507
    Rep Power
    44

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Quote Originally Posted by TekeRam View Post
    Same as everyone else, though the 2 and 3 positions continually switch. I'm starting to feel Long, Long, Gholston, Dorsey though.
    I agree with Tekeram,I also have the 2 and 3 switched.

  13. #13
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: g dorsey !!

    1. Dorsey
    2. Chris Long
    3. Jake Long
    4. Gholston

    Main reason, I always go against the norm because in my experience the norm is usually wrong. No offense to anyone, but that's just a fact. Anyway, why not move Carriker to DE where he belongs and put the best DT in the draft at UT? Who knows, maybe he'll be even better at DE and then we have Dorsey and Ryan on the front line?

    Sounds good to me

  14. #14
    TekeRam's Avatar
    TekeRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,879
    Rep Power
    71

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Why not move AC? Because he was a 3-4 DE, not a 4-3 DE. His responsibilities in college were pretty much the exact same as a pass rushing UT. If Ryan can start and play the nose, then there's no reason why Carriker shouldn't start the three tech. If you think that Chris Long is too slow to play 4-3 DE, then you haven't seen Carriker yet.

    If we get Dorsey and move AC to end, we'll be amazingly strong against the rush, however, how many 300+ lbs pass rushers do you see coming around the edge? Not too many. Michael Strahan is 255, but he's an anomaly. He lost the weight to become faster because he was already able to bull rush tackles, but wasn't much of a speed threat. A good speed rusher's probably in the 260's range, a balanced end in the 270's.

  15. #15
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: g dorsey !!

    Well....ok. Just trying to somehow get the best DT that has come out of college in quite awhile. I just think it's a shame that we don't want to draft Dorsey because we drafted a 3-4 DE to play UT the year before and now we have that player possibly out of position and won't draft Dorsey because we need a DE who might just be a combine commando but gametime dud.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gordo Live
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -03-17-2008, 07:59 PM
  2. Nick’s Mailbag –Friday, February 22, 2008
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -02-23-2008, 01:39 PM
  3. wow...dorsey can play
    By bruce4life in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: -01-10-2008, 06:06 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-28-2004, 10:40 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-14-2004, 02:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •