Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By thoey

Thread: How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?

  1. #1
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is offline Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    18,671
    Rep Power
    168

    How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?

    In trying to figure out who will be available at pick #16, we first have to assess which players are "certain" (in quotes, as nothing it truly certain) to go in the top 15.

    My list has 10 players on it (in alphabetical order):

    Ezekiel Ansah
    Eric Fisher
    Sharif Floyd
    Luke Joekel
    Lane Johnson
    Dion Jordan
    Star Lotulelei
    Dee Milliner
    Xavier Rhodes
    Geno Smith

    That leaves 5 spots unaccounted for before the Rams pick.

    If I'm right about the 10, that makes me feel pretty good, as that would mean that at least one of the six players I have as "first tier" targets would be availabe at #16. They are (again, in alphabetical order): Keenan Allen, Tavon Austin, Jonathan Cooper, D.J. Fluker, Cordarrelle Patterson and Chance Warmack.

    Agree?

    Disagree?


  2. #2
    richtree's Avatar
    richtree is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,133
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?

    Obviously, Fisher and Joekel seem to be locks....but if you look at the teams that need Oline help in the top 14 picks....there are so many....

    Chiefs, Raiders, Eagles, Lions, Cards, Bills, Chargers, Dolphins, and even a few others that could like Jets etc...

    The past few years have proven that good Offensive Line help is a high priority, even over better Defensive Tackles......

    I think that would lock up a minimum of 4 Oline picks in top 15 --- probably 5 and maybe even 6.....


    So, I would say Joekel, Fisher, Warmack, Fluker all definately gone by pick #15 (sub Cooper if you have him ranked higher)

  3. #3
    thoey's Avatar
    thoey is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,054
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?

    How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?
    Well, I would think 15 players will certainly be gone by the time we pick at 16...

    Oh, you want to know which players? Sorry...

    TekeRam and ManofGod like this.
    This space for rent...

  4. #4
    TekeRam's Avatar
    TekeRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,879
    Rep Power
    71

    Re: How many players are you "certain" will go in the top 15?

    I like your list, Av, but would probably include Mingo and maybe drop Geno Smith off of it.

    My reason is as follows. We're down to about 4 teams that could realistically go after a 1st round QB: Jaguars(2), Eagles(4), Bills(8), and Jets(9). Jags have a new coaching staff, but a young and supposedly NFL ready bust.. errr, QB. They could very well move on from Gabbert, but I'm not sure. Eagles have Vick, but I really want to say that they held onto him only because he dropped his salary and they want to wait until next year's crop. They could jump on Smith though, if Kelly thinks he's athletic enough.

    Now, the Bills have gotten Kolb, but he's not the answer; they are drafting someone. But at 8, with no one really looking for a QB after them... can they skip QB early and come back in the 2nd or trade into the 1st and get one later(this is how I played them in our mock)? The only worry for them would be the QB needy teams grabbing QB's in the early second or trading up. That could lead them to go for it as they could be down to their 5th guy by the time they pick again.

    Now, the Jets have no reason to go after a QB this year. The crop sucks, they have to pay Sanchez, and they don't even have a long term head coach to determine what kind of QB that they want and need. As such, they're going to double down on USC and go for Barkley. Why? Because the Jets are a train wreck.

    Anyway, I want to think that at least one QB will go in the top 15... but I just get some feeling that the teams still wanting early QB's are going to play a low stakes game of chicken and go for better talent first and then scramble on the back end. Is it smart? Probably not... but if I had job security, I'd go for talent, suck it up next year and get a better QB in the early 1st next year.
    I believe!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: -01-09-2013, 01:39 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: -03-24-2012, 02:56 PM
  3. Rams Report: Players "get after it" in pads ..
    By MauiRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -08-01-2010, 06:48 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: -11-16-2006, 10:55 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: -11-14-2005, 06:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •