Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    tomahawk247's Avatar
    tomahawk247 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Essex, England
    Age
    27
    Posts
    4,658
    Rep Power
    57

    i used to be very against drafting Dorsey

    mainly because of our need at DE and the fact Chris Long and Vernon Gholston would be on the board. Also we did draft Carriker to play UT last year.

    however, i do think Dorsey is a great tackle, and the pairing of Dorsey and Carriker in the middle would be excellent. If we got Dorsey i think we would do away with the NT/UT alignment and just play with two DTs

    The only thing is that if we do take Dorsey we have to take a good pass rushing DE at some point in the draft. i would prefer one in the second round, but if we do that we would then lose out on the talent at OT and WR.

    If we take Dorsey in the first, i would like to see us go DE in the second, OT in the third and then get a speedy WR in the fourth. i think thats the only real way i can be happy with the draft.
    Last edited by tomahawk247; -04-23-2008 at 07:58 AM.


  2. #2
    lostsoul's Avatar
    lostsoul is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    610
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: i used to be very against drafting Dorsey

    My vote is Take Trevor Laws in the 2nd.

Similar Threads

  1. Jim Thomas Live
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -11-23-2008, 08:57 PM
  2. Jim Thomas Live: 4/15/08
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -04-15-2008, 07:35 PM
  3. Jim Thomas Live
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -04-09-2008, 09:53 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-28-2004, 10:40 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-14-2004, 02:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •