View Poll Results: Patterson or Austin?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • Patterson

    22 56.41%
  • Austin

    11 28.21%
  • Neither

    6 15.38%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

  1. #1
    lostsoul's Avatar
    lostsoul is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    621
    Rep Power
    10

    If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Say pick 16 comes up and both Tavon Austin and Cordarrelle Patterson are both there, who would you want? I see a lot of people mocking both of these guys in the top 15 and both are extremely talented.


  2. #2
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,641
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Patterson, by a long shot.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  3. #3
    Flippin' Ram's Avatar
    Flippin' Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    32

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    I'm going with Austin because we need a small receiver who'll provide a great countermeasure against physical corners. Givens and Amendola were capable of beating the likes of Sherman and Browner with their capabilities of using space. If we didn't draft Quick and acquire Cook, I wouldn't mind getting Cordarelle Patterson.
    ManofGod likes this.

  4. #4
    Vinnie25's Avatar
    Vinnie25 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    869
    Rep Power
    4

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Due to his versatility, I'd go with Austin. With him and Cook on the field, defenses will have to adjust to what the Rams are doing instead of the other way around. I like Patterson too, but I'd rather have Quick and Givens developing on the outside with Austin either playing in the slot or in the backfield.
    ManofGod likes this.

  5. #5
    KiwiRam's Avatar
    KiwiRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Samoa
    Posts
    42
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Patterson ... not by much, would rather a behemoth Guard at 16.

  6. #6
    TekeRam's Avatar
    TekeRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,879
    Rep Power
    71

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Warmack, Cooper or Fluker, thanks.
    I believe!

  7. #7
    QUINNtessentialTruth's Avatar
    QUINNtessentialTruth is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,204
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Patterson, when in doubt take the size in a receiver


  8. #8
    ZiaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,530
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Patterson wont be there by 16 and Austin is way to early at 16 so I voted neither

  9. #9
    Fortuninerhater's Avatar
    Fortuninerhater is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    L.A., Ca.
    Posts
    2,667
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    When in doubt, which I'm not, take the multidemensional one.

    Austin or Patterson in a landslide.

    One thing about Austin is if we don't get him this year, De'Anthony Thomas will be there next year and he may be even faster than Austin.
    Last edited by Fortuninerhater; -03-18-2013 at 01:02 AM.

  10. #10
    SportsDude is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    126
    Rep Power
    4

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    I would be upset if Patterson was available at #16 and we didn't draft him.
    THOLTFAN81 likes this.

    Quote Originally Posted by BrokenWing View Post
    Also, craig dahl still sucks.

  11. #11
    richtree's Avatar
    richtree is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,136
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Patterson is the guy to get and will not make it to 16......

    The choice will probably be if you want Cooper v. Austin

  12. #12
    shower beers's Avatar
    shower beers is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,045
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Quote Originally Posted by ZiaRam View Post
    Patterson wont be there by 16 and Austin is way to early at 16 so I voted neither

    There's a lot of buzz about Austin being a top-15 pick right now, actually.

    That said, I don't know if I would take either one.
    mde8352gorams likes this.

  13. #13
    ZiaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,530
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    Quote Originally Posted by shower beers View Post
    There's a lot of buzz about Austin being a top-15 pick right now, actually.

    That said, I don't know if I would take either one.
    Meh regardless if there is a buzz like Warmack going 1st overall it's not going to happen...

  14. #14
    jmk321's Avatar
    jmk321 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    albany
    Posts
    591
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    The obvious choice a couple weeks ago would have been Patterson but the Cook signing might have changed some things. If the Rams plan on using Cook exclusively at receiver and line him up both on the outside and in the slot then I wouldn't want the spend a pick on Patterson, but if Cook is going to be used mostly as a tight end and slot receiver then I would be very happy picking up Patterson at 16 if he's there.

  15. #15
    jerseyramsfan's Avatar
    jerseyramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    419
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: If at Pick 16 We Had A Choice Between...

    At 16 we still gotta take care of the line!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Look, we have no choice!
    By laram0 in forum Articles by laram0
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -10-16-2011, 01:08 PM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: -12-09-2009, 11:39 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: -03-26-2008, 02:19 PM
  4. Rams have tough choice with #2 pick
    By Tampa_Ram in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: -03-25-2008, 06:03 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: -04-22-2005, 09:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •