Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    rob6465's Avatar
    rob6465 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    228
    Rep Power
    8

    jason campbell and Suh?

    What about inquiring about Jason Campbell and using #1 on Suh?


  2. #2
    thickandthin's Avatar
    thickandthin is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    460
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    I like it but what would we have to give up for Campbell?

  3. #3
    sosa39rams's Avatar
    sosa39rams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, On
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by thickandthin View Post
    I like it but what would we have to give up for Campbell?
    This isn't a bad idea.

  4. #4
    rob6465's Avatar
    rob6465 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    228
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by thickandthin View Post
    I like it but what would we have to give up for Campbell?
    Probably not alot. I love that he is 6'5"/28 yrs old. and had TDS20
    INT15
    YDS3,618
    RTG86.4

  5. #5
    thickandthin's Avatar
    thickandthin is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    460
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by sosa39rams View Post
    This isn't a bad idea.
    I agree it's not a bad idea. But what would we have to give up for him?

  6. #6
    rob6465's Avatar
    rob6465 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    228
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Last 2 years he has had more than 3,000 yards and more TD's than INT. He played for a bad redskins team and still put up very good numbers. He was 1st rd pick in 2005. Now that I think about it, we might need to give up a decent draft pick. What do you all think ?

  7. #7
    TheBritishRam's Avatar
    TheBritishRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oxford
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,139
    Rep Power
    31

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    I'm guessing his value isn't dissimilar to McNabb's. I think it would be a 2nd then some other conditional draft picks based on performance.

  8. #8
    sosa39rams's Avatar
    sosa39rams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, On
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBritishRam View Post
    I'm guessing his value isn't dissimilar to McNabb's. I think it would be a 2nd then some other conditional draft picks based on performance.
    I dont think we'd have to give a 2nd. Probably a 3rd and Alex Barron, or Adam Carricker.

  9. #9
    Dominating D's Avatar
    Dominating D is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    829
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Campbell strength does not match up with the West Coast System. That is why the Redskins made a deal for McNabb and the Rams will not trade for Campbell.

    If the Rams wanted a QB via trade McNabb would have been the obvious choice.

    Campbell to Oakland would not surprise me.

    Go Rams
    Last edited by Dominating D; -04-05-2010 at 10:52 AM.

  10. #10
    rams_man13 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    162
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    I wouldn't give up anything more than a 5th for him... the Redskins have no leverage and we'd need to bring in a lot of offensive weapons for him to be successful. I'd love the move if we got Campbell for our 5.24 and Alex Barron, then traded 2.01 and Adam Carricker to the Bronco's for Brandon Marshall and Tony Scheffler. I think Marshall, Robinson, Avery, Scheffler and S-Jax could make Campbell a pretty good QB.

    Then we'd focus completely on defense this draft and next and make a pretty good team in 2 years, finding a RT and back-up RB along the way.
    Last edited by rams_man13; -04-05-2010 at 10:53 AM.

  11. #11
    Ramsdog's Avatar
    Ramsdog is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Dominating D is right on.....No DEAL. Campbell is not our future, but it was a good thought. Grab Bradford. He is a beast.

  12. #12
    BarronWade's Avatar
    BarronWade is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,427
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    But Cambell is not a franchise QB. And is not as accurate. Spags needs to get his guy the guy who he thinks he can be with for many years. We need a face to our franchise and If spags thinks thats bradford we wont be in any talks.

    Also when has Cambell shown he can be better than an average QB?

  13. #13
    rams_man13 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    162
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by BarronWade View Post
    But Cambell is not a franchise QB. And is not as accurate. Spags needs to get his guy the guy who he thinks he can be with for many years. We need a face to our franchise and If spags thinks thats bradford we wont be in any talks.

    Also when has Cambell shown he can be better than an average QB?
    He's improved year after year and doesn't have a ton of talent around him.

    I think he could operate a top 5 offense if he had a lot of talent surrounding him, but I don't think he could operate a top 5 offense pretty much on his own (like Brees, Manning, Brady and McNabb in his prime).

  14. #14
    Dominating D's Avatar
    Dominating D is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    829
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    Quote Originally Posted by rams_man13 View Post
    I wouldn't give up anything more than a 5th for him... the Redskins have no leverage and we'd need to bring in a lot of offensive weapons for him to be successful. I'd love the move if we got Campbell for our 5.24 and Alex Barron, then traded 2.01 and Adam Carricker to the Bronco's for Brandon Marshall and Tony Scheffler. I think Marshall, Robinson, Avery, Scheffler and S-Jax could make Campbell a pretty good QB.

    Then we'd focus completely on defense this draft and next and make a pretty good team in 2 years, finding a RT and back-up RB along the way.
    If you could pull off this trade eventhough I am not a fan of Marshall but you can not argue his production on the field.

    So the Rams lose
    Carricker
    Barron
    5th round
    2nd round

    The Rams will acquire
    Sheffler
    Marshall
    Campbell

    Not sure why the Rams would have to give up Barron and a 5th round? I think Barron alone should seal the deal.

    I would not be too upset if the Rams pulled off this block buster. However, if they get Campbell they need to do away with the West Coast Offense.

    Go Rams

  15. #15
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is offline Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    18,491
    Rep Power
    167

    Re: jason campbell and Suh?

    I don't think the Redskins are in a position to hold out for too much in a trade for Campbell at this point, so I wouldn't offer anything more than a 3rd or 4th round pick.

    I like how Campbell has developed over the years, and I think he could be a solid starter for several more. I don't think he has the upside of a guy like Bradford, but if the Rams could work out a deal that would allow them to add Suh, the BPA at pick 33, and Campbell, I'd be intrigued.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •