Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ndamukong Suh

  1. #1
    sosa39rams's Avatar
    sosa39rams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, On
    Posts
    5,571
    Rep Power
    45

    Ndamukong Suh

    Just imagine a rotational d-line with: Chris Long, Leonard Little, Adam Carriker, Cliff Ryan, Fred Robbins, and Ndamukong Suh.

    That would just continue to stop the run+ put pressure on a QB. That would be amazing!

    But imagine Sam Bradford, working with our offense and some possible added weapons.

    Which do you prefer?


  2. #2
    RockinRam's Avatar
    RockinRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4,173
    Rep Power
    44

    Re: Ndamukong Suh

    I would prefer Bradford and newly added weapons.

    If we get Ndamukong Suh, I do not want him in a rotational set-up. I want him in on every down, since he is the number 1 overall pick, and is supposedly a beast-like Warren Sap of the future.

    Which means, Adam Carriker has really no one to rotate with. Rotate with Clifton Ryan? Robbins and Dorell Scott are already rotating with Ryan at the NT spot. No room for Carriker there.

    If we signed Robbins to be a starter, we can basically say good-bye to drafting Suh.

  3. #3
    Flippin' Ram's Avatar
    Flippin' Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,522
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Ndamukong Suh

    I'd prefer Suh but if we have another huge losing season, then the DeSpags regime might go bye-bye. Like I said in previous threads, getting Bradford's only necessary IF we can get extra picks from Detroit or Tampa.

    If only everyone understood how the Rams are trying to be long-term playoff contenders through seasons of sacrifices and our fans having to put bags on our heads rather than a quick, half-witted .400-.600 PCT team like the whiners.

  4. #4
    bigtiger737 Guest

    Re: Ndamukong Suh

    Suh!

    If Bradford came with thenecessary weapons maybe but.. we don't get them we get bradford and that's all.. between the 2 I would rather get SUh and atleast help get the defence useful.. Bradford comming in and getting crushed doesn't help us.. even stafford had c. Johnson.. we don't have anything for bradford to excel with.. Get the defence and the offence will come..

  5. #5
    ludairv's Avatar
    ludairv is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    277
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Ndamukong Suh

    lol its not gunna happen people....theyre not gunna make him the highest paid DT and hes a rookie....new ownership means new qb for spags and devaney too develop...it gives them time to saves their asses lol ...if they give 12 (or w.e) million to a rookie DT and he doesnt do well,....then bye bye spags n devaney.....and by the standards that rams fans have of D-players (aka carriker and C. long ..only until recently) ppl are gunna expect crazy imapct from a DT like 10+ sacks....and its not gunna happen... this regime has to develop a young QB its been long enough...

Similar Threads

  1. Ndamukong Suh on 101ESPN's The Fast Lane
    By Nick in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -02-21-2010, 03:33 PM
  2. Ndamukong Suh
    By Milan in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: -02-13-2010, 02:35 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: -02-10-2010, 01:13 PM
  4. Ndamukong Suh
    By Frito in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: -12-27-2009, 12:17 PM
  5. The Ndamukong Suh Thread
    By shower beers in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -12-14-2009, 07:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •