Re: New Rams mock w/ trade
Not for me, unfortunately.
The Broncos traded up four slots last year and had to sacrifice their thrid. What makes you think GB will have to sacrifice any less that that? I wouldn't be happy if we were in a position to draft someone to solidify the line, and traded back to improve our secondary, which is arguably becoming a strong unit already, I wouldn't be a happy camper.
Don't you think 16 is a little high for Griffin anyways?
Unless, that is, you made a major typo and are planning to start Griffin at DE.:)
Also not big on starting a 4th round DT.
With that said, rounds 2 and 3 are great, but we'd be lucky to get Woodley there. I think he's more of a mid-to-late second rounder.
Later rounds are good.
C+
Re: New Rams mock w/ trade
we don't select a a safety in the first round unless Landry is there. other than that, pretty decent draft.
Re: New Rams mock w/ trade
Quote:
Originally Posted by
snowbozo21
we don't select a a safety in the first round unless Landry is there. other than that, pretty decent draft.
I'm not even sure we'll take Landry if we have the opportunity of improve our D-line.
Re: New Rams mock w/ trade
I don't know a whole lot about most of the players coming through the draft, so I won't comment on that part of it. But your projected line up sheet has Minor at #2 RB. If that happens, we are screwed, and I will have to just sit by and watch the Pats win another SB.
Re: New Rams mock w/ trade
no, no, no, uuuhhhmmmm.no , uuhhmmmmm, no , no no no no no nono.hhhhmmmmmmm, ah ha, no.we still need at least one drafted de, dt, lb. before hall , i wanted two de's drafted. but even if we sign wistrom, we have 3-de's over thirty,, and i would still like 2. we don't need a damn safty in the first.
