Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    RamsFan16's Avatar
    RamsFan16 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    Age
    24
    Posts
    5,072
    Rep Power
    38

    New Rams mock w/ trade

    Trade: Green Bay trades R1 (16) and R4 (76) to St. Louis for R1 (13) and selects Marshawn Lynch.

    Rams sign DE Grant Wistrom to a 2 year deal.


    Round 1. Michael Griffin, Safety, Texas


    Round 2. Stewart Bradly, Strongside Linebacker, Nebraska


    Round 3. Lamarr Woodley, Defensive End, Michigna


    Round 4. Paul Soliai, Nose Tackle, Utah


    Round 4. Aundrae Allison, Wide Reciever, East Carolina


    Round 5. DeAndre Jackson, Cornerback/Punt/Kick Returner, Iowa State


    Round 6. Alonzo Coleman, Running Back, Hampton


    Round 7. Palauni Ma Sun, Offensive Guard, Oregon




    Projected Lineup: Starter | Backup
    QB Bulger | Frerotte
    RB Jackson | Minor
    FB Hedgecock | Walker
    WR Holt | Looker
    WR Bruce | Bennett
    TE McMichael | Klopfenstein
    LT Pace | Goldberg
    LG Setterstrom | Steussie
    C Romberg | Incognito
    RG Incognito | Ma Sun
    RT Barron | Goldberg

    RE Hall | Wistrom
    UT Wroten | Glover
    NT Soliai | Kennedy
    LE Little | Adeyanju
    WLB Tinoisamoa | Alston
    MLB Witherspoon | Kaczyvenski
    SLB Bradley | Chillar
    RCB Hill | Brown
    FS Atogwe | Johnson
    SS Chavous/Griffin - Starts Chavous but Griffin slowly gets more playing time until he's starting.
    LCB Bartell | D. Jackson

    K Wilkins
    P Sanders
    KR D. Jackson
    PR D. Jackson
    Last edited by RamsFan16; -03-10-2007 at 05:01 PM.

    RamsFan16

  2. #2
    Bar-bq's Avatar
    Bar-bq is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,877
    Rep Power
    94

    Re: New Rams mock w/ trade

    Not for me, unfortunately.

    The Broncos traded up four slots last year and had to sacrifice their thrid. What makes you think GB will have to sacrifice any less that that? I wouldn't be happy if we were in a position to draft someone to solidify the line, and traded back to improve our secondary, which is arguably becoming a strong unit already, I wouldn't be a happy camper.

    Don't you think 16 is a little high for Griffin anyways?

    Unless, that is, you made a major typo and are planning to start Griffin at DE.

    Also not big on starting a 4th round DT.

    With that said, rounds 2 and 3 are great, but we'd be lucky to get Woodley there. I think he's more of a mid-to-late second rounder.

    Later rounds are good.

    C+

  3. #3
    snowbozo21's Avatar
    snowbozo21 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    73
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: New Rams mock w/ trade

    we don't select a a safety in the first round unless Landry is there. other than that, pretty decent draft.

  4. #4
    Bar-bq's Avatar
    Bar-bq is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,877
    Rep Power
    94

    Re: New Rams mock w/ trade

    Quote Originally Posted by snowbozo21 View Post
    we don't select a a safety in the first round unless Landry is there. other than that, pretty decent draft.
    I'm not even sure we'll take Landry if we have the opportunity of improve our D-line.

  5. #5
    itsguud's Avatar
    itsguud is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Newfoundland
    Posts
    1,251
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: New Rams mock w/ trade

    I don't know a whole lot about most of the players coming through the draft, so I won't comment on that part of it. But your projected line up sheet has Minor at #2 RB. If that happens, we are screwed, and I will have to just sit by and watch the Pats win another SB.

  6. #6
    keith m. klink Guest

    Re: New Rams mock w/ trade

    no, no, no, uuuhhhmmmm.no , uuhhmmmmm, no , no no no no no nono.hhhhmmmmmmm, ah ha, no.we still need at least one drafted de, dt, lb. before hall , i wanted two de's drafted. but even if we sign wistrom, we have 3-de's over thirty,, and i would still like 2. we don't need a damn safty in the first.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •