Von Miller wouldn't fit as a 4-3 LB.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFalco
And our FO needs to select who they think is the best player. Not biggest need. We were the 2nd worst team last year. Pretty much every position needs to be upgraded.
Printable View
Von Miller wouldn't fit as a 4-3 LB.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFalco
And our FO needs to select who they think is the best player. Not biggest need. We were the 2nd worst team last year. Pretty much every position needs to be upgraded.
The Broncos run a 4-3....Quote:
Originally Posted by md8
And he plays... DE!Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFalco
no he doesnt... rofl. look at my location before you want to get into this.
They put him close to the line in certain sets. he never lines up as starting DE. They eithier put him next to Dumervil or he will sub to Ayers side if Ayers comes out. Thats the one time he subs in as DE, and its still in 4-3. Rest of the time he is dropping back in coverage etc.
Broncos havnt used the 3-4 really since 2011.
You're right they probably are lol, but still would you rather have them or a probowl DT? I'm not saying Brockers will, but you draft who you thinks the better player not just need. I know DT is a boring pick compared to WR, but it doesn't mean they aren't just as important.Quote:
you know whats funny, all those WRs are still better then the Rams WR core..
i would rather have D thomas, crabtree and maybe one or 2 others yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by md8
Wow.... then you seriously overrate WR.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFalco
Stephen Hill with the 33??
And he sucked when he played OLB. He did most of his damage as DE.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFalco
I'd rather Randle. He's got more production, played against better competition, and has about the same attributes.Quote:
Originally Posted by hill_Bartell=Probowl
He's got my vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by hill_Bartell=Probowl
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill_Bartell=Probowl
Please, please, please, please let him be the pick. I'll keep my fingers crossed overnight.
What linemen are stil available and linebackers?
what? there is a reason he is defensive mvp. He SUBBED IN at de maybe 2 out of every 20 plays. They always blitzed him so it looked like he was de to you. Just stop.Quote:
Originally Posted by md8
the thing about this pick is that brockers at 14 seems too high for someone who barely played in college.Quote:
Originally Posted by general counsel
Also- brokers is assumed to be more a run stopper than a 3 down tackle.
If we are looking for a meat theres plenty more to be had in rd 2.
Meanwhile we miss out on someone like decastro who helps our qb, rb, and indirectly our wr via pass protection.
Now in rd 2 we could have taken wr, olb, dt.
Tom we need to go wr at 33.
I feel like Brockers was the oh sh.t panic pick as all the 1st rd targets were gone, and they were unprepared for the leap frogging that had occured in the prior picks.