throwback week



View Poll Results: Which option would you rather

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Option 1

    2 4.88%
  • Option 2

    28 68.29%
  • Option 3

    11 26.83%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    sntlouisrams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK baby :D
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    6

    Cool Which option would you rather?

    Which option would you rather? Out of these three options
    Option 1

    ROUND 1 QB J.Clausen



    ROUND 2 WR G.Tate



    ROUND 3 WR/RB/KR D.McCluster



    Option 2

    ROUND 1 DT N.Suh



    ROUND 2 LB S.Weatherspoon



    ROUND 3 C K.Wilson



    Option 3

    ROUND 1 QB S.Bradford



    ROUND 2 TE J.Gresham



    ROUND 3 RB J.McKnight



    There are all your choices people 1,2 or 3 just have a go

    Also add comment in below so that I can evaluate
    Last edited by sntlouisrams; -02-17-2010 at 11:39 AM.


  2. #2
    sntlouisrams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK baby :D
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    6

    Exclamation Re: Which option would you rather?

    Before anybody has a moan, it is just for fun. Yes I know they are very offence or defence heavy but just go with the flow as much as a most awesome defence would be nice I went for option 1 good qb wr and allrounder wld do us good me thinks

  3. #3
    BarronWade's Avatar
    BarronWade is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,438
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    I say #3

    We get our franchise QB

    We get him an inside/redzone weapon

    We give S-Jax a rest because he showed he was getting tired down the stretch.

  4. #4
    sntlouisrams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK baby :D
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    I agree with you totally, the sad thing is all 3 options cover areas of need for us. But I did like option 3 because of the RB and if he slid to 3 it would be an absolute steal end of round 2 beginning of round 3 will be interesting.

  5. #5
    rams_man13 Guest

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    I like option 2 with Dexter McCluster in the 3rd.

    I think that provides us with a good value pick in all three rounds.

    My least favorite option would be #1 because I don't really like either Claussen or Tate.

  6. #6
    KoaKoi is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    911
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    for me, was a real tough decision between #2 and #3.

    Rams have GOT to infuse some more talent on the offensive side, but i thought BPA wise, that option #2 was a tad better than #3. but i wouldn't be upset if Rams went with option #3.

    i like what Robinson, Avery, Burton, Gibson, and Amendola bring to the wr/kr/flex side, so given the Rams draft position, i just didn't think the value was there in #1. plus, clausen is a question mark in my mind.

    would love seeing J. Mcknight picked up by Rams in rd. 3. i'm curous to see if he'll be there come 3rd round.
    Last edited by KoaKoi; -02-17-2010 at 08:33 PM.

  7. #7
    lostsoul's Avatar
    lostsoul is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    629
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    2 definately but no way Wilson drops to the 3rd.

  8. #8
    RAMarkable is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Age
    59
    Posts
    2,116
    Rep Power
    41

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    I'm going for option #3. I believe that Bradford is the real deal and will show it at the combine and his Pro Day. I look for Billy to be tremendously impressed with him.

    I love the Gresham pick, but, unfortunately, I just don't think there is much of a chance that he's there in the 2nd. But if by chance he is there GRAB HIM!! I mean we haven't had a game-changing TE since..well...I guess never.

    McKnight brings the necessary size along with the athleticism that is required to be an effective back up to S. Jax. I don't want any scat backs until we've got a viable, physical RB so when Jax goes out of the game we don't have to change the offensive philosophy much.

    WHAT SAY YE?

  9. #9
    #39 Fan Guest

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Wow... drool

    All three of those are pretty nice, 2 & 3 moreso than the first one for me.

    I'd go with #3, and be grinning about it

  10. #10
    Warner4prez Guest

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Number 2. It'd be great to have a rock solid defense.

  11. #11
    sntlouisrams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK baby :D
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    In response I thought heavily about this and if he was around in late 2nd we could trade in to get him perhaps>?

  12. #12
    GROUND DOG 39's Avatar
    GROUND DOG 39 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    MANCHESTER, U.K.
    Posts
    1,483
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Quote Originally Posted by sntlouisrams View Post
    I agree with you totally, the sad thing is all 3 options cover areas of need for us. But I did like option 3 because of the RB and if he slid to 3 it would be an absolute steal end of round 2 beginning of round 3 will be interesting.
    What a mess this team is in. They are definately like a exspansion outfit without the perks of extra draft picks.
    Option 2 had the most benefit's for the BPA, but this poll really was frustrating as a Rams fan.
    I do think it was a huge shame Jake Locker didnt come out this year, thats what No.1 overall draft picks should be like, maybe next year?

  13. #13
    TheRammer Guest

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Without a doubt #2, altho its more defensive but I think if BPA is there you have to take em even if they are defensive and pick up some offensive FA's

  14. #14
    cfh128's Avatar
    cfh128 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Age
    31
    Posts
    783
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    I went with two, but if they go all offense or all defense with the first 3 picks I'm not going to be real happy about it either way.

  15. #15
    sntlouisrams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UK baby :D
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Quote Originally Posted by cfh128 View Post
    I went with two, but if they go all offense or all defense with the first 3 picks I'm not going to be real happy about it either way.

    I know I know, but its just a what if kind of thought process there is no way we draft 123 offence or defence but just for thoughts was the idea.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Could Michael Vick be an option for St. Louis Rams?
    By THOLTFAN81 in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: -01-19-2010, 11:52 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: -03-06-2009, 10:47 AM
  3. The Nuclear Option
    By HUbison in forum Articles by HUbison
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -10-09-2006, 10:54 PM
  4. Salary Cap Request
    By HUbison in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -12-31-2004, 02:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •