View Poll Results: Which option would you rather
- Voters
- 41. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Thread: Which option would you rather?
-
-02-17-2010 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- UK baby :D
- Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 0
Which option would you rather?
Which option would you rather? Out of these three options
Option 1
ROUND 1 QB J.Clausen

ROUND 2 WR G.Tate

ROUND 3 WR/RB/KR D.McCluster

Option 2
ROUND 1 DT N.Suh

ROUND 2 LB S.Weatherspoon

ROUND 3 C K.Wilson

Option 3
ROUND 1 QB S.Bradford

ROUND 2 TE J.Gresham

ROUND 3 RB J.McKnight

There are all your choices people 1,2 or 3 just have a go
Also add comment in below so that I can evaluateLast edited by sntlouisrams; -02-17-2010 at 11:39 AM.
-
-02-17-2010 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- UK baby :D
- Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Which option would you rather?
Before anybody has a moan, it is just for fun. Yes I know they are very offence or defence heavy but just go with the flow
as much as a most awesome defence would be nice I went for option 1 good qb wr and allrounder wld do us good me thinks
-
-02-17-2010 #3
Re: Which option would you rather?
I say #3
We get our franchise QB
We get him an inside/redzone weapon
We give S-Jax a rest because he showed he was getting tired down the stretch.
-
-02-17-2010 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- UK baby :D
- Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Which option would you rather?
I agree with you totally, the sad thing is all 3 options cover areas of need for us. But I did like option 3 because of the RB and if he slid to 3 it would be an absolute steal end of round 2 beginning of round 3 will be interesting.
-
-02-17-2010 #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 162
- Rep Power
- 9
Re: Which option would you rather?
I like option 2 with Dexter McCluster in the 3rd.
I think that provides us with a good value pick in all three rounds.
My least favorite option would be #1 because I don't really like either Claussen or Tate.
-
-02-17-2010 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 710
- Rep Power
- 25
Re: Which option would you rather?
for me, was a real tough decision between #2 and #3.
Rams have GOT to infuse some more talent on the offensive side, but i thought BPA wise, that option #2 was a tad better than #3. but i wouldn't be upset if Rams went with option #3.
i like what Robinson, Avery, Burton, Gibson, and Amendola bring to the wr/kr/flex side, so given the Rams draft position, i just didn't think the value was there in #1. plus, clausen is a question mark in my mind.
would love seeing J. Mcknight picked up by Rams in rd. 3. i'm curous to see if he'll be there come 3rd round.Last edited by KoaKoi; -02-17-2010 at 08:33 PM.
-
-02-17-2010 #7
Re: Which option would you rather?
2 definately but no way Wilson drops to the 3rd.
-
-02-17-2010 #8
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Arkansas
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 2,023
- Rep Power
- 39
Re: Which option would you rather?
I'm going for option #3. I believe that Bradford is the real deal and will show it at the combine and his Pro Day. I look for Billy to be tremendously impressed with him.
I love the Gresham pick, but, unfortunately, I just don't think there is much of a chance that he's there in the 2nd. But if by chance he is there GRAB HIM!! I mean we haven't had a game-changing TE since..well...I guess never.
McKnight brings the necessary size along with the athleticism that is required to be an effective back up to S. Jax. I don't want any scat backs until we've got a viable, physical RB so when Jax goes out of the game we don't have to change the offensive philosophy much.
WHAT SAY YE?
-
-02-18-2010 #9
Re: Which option would you rather?
Wow... drool
All three of those are pretty nice, 2 & 3 moreso than the first one for me.
I'd go with #3, and be grinning about it
-
-02-18-2010 #10
Re: Which option would you rather?
Number 2. It'd be great to have a rock solid defense.
-
-02-18-2010 #11
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- UK baby :D
- Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Which option would you rather?
In response I thought heavily about this and if he was around in late 2nd we could trade in to get him perhaps>?
-
-02-18-2010 #12
Re: Which option would you rather?
What a mess this team is in. They are definately like a exspansion outfit without the perks of extra draft picks.
Option 2 had the most benefit's for the BPA, but this poll really was frustrating as a Rams fan.
I do think it was a huge shame Jake Locker didnt come out this year, thats what No.1 overall draft picks should be like, maybe next year?
-
-02-18-2010 #13TheRammer Guest
Re: Which option would you rather?
Without a doubt #2, altho its more defensive but I think if BPA is there you have to take em even if they are defensive and pick up some offensive FA's
-
-02-18-2010 #14
Re: Which option would you rather?
I went with two, but if they go all offense or all defense with the first 3 picks I'm not going to be real happy about it either way.
-
-02-18-2010 #15
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- UK baby :D
- Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 0
Similar Threads
-
Could Michael Vick be an option for St. Louis Rams?
By THOLTFAN81 in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 55Last Post: -01-19-2010, 11:52 PM -
Karney released by Saints, possible option for us at FB?
By Nick in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 8Last Post: -03-06-2009, 10:47 AM -
The Nuclear Option
By HUbison in forum Articles by HUbisonReplies: 2Last Post: -10-09-2006, 10:54 PM -
Salary Cap Request
By HUbison in forum RAM TALKReplies: 7Last Post: -12-31-2004, 02:48 AM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks