View Poll Results: Which option would you rather

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Option 1

    2 4.88%
  • Option 2

    28 68.29%
  • Option 3

    11 26.83%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    npow81's Avatar
    npow81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ID
    Posts
    193
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Anyway we go the picks in the 1st and 2nd should probably 1 offense 1 defense. Our offense is further behind at this point in my mind so it would be dangerous to go D the first three rounds. Therefore, while I like Option 2 the best i'd like to throw in an offensive player in round 2.

    As for Kyle Wilson, he's good, and definetly worth a third round pick, and would fit in well with the D because he's a physical corner (my only knock on him is that he's too physical at times, and will get too many PI calls (which in watching him at Senior Bowl practice isn't really taken into account.)


  2. #17
    01d 0rd3r's Avatar
    01d 0rd3r is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,259
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: Which option would you rather?

    Option #2 would be a dream draft for me. No way that boards fall like that but it would be nice.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Could Michael Vick be an option for St. Louis Rams?
    By THOLTFAN81 in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: -01-19-2010, 11:52 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: -03-06-2009, 10:47 AM
  3. The Nuclear Option
    By HUbison in forum Articles by HUbison
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -10-09-2006, 10:54 PM
  4. Salary Cap Request
    By HUbison in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -12-31-2004, 02:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •