Results 16 to 30 of 47
-
-03-10-2009 #16
Re: OT PACE Released ! Now who do we Draft?
-
-03-10-2009 #17
Re: OT PACE Released ! Now who do we Draft?
Of corse he will it is his contract year all players play better in there last year of contract. So the last three years at RT were great for the Rams and Barron.
I don't think so.
Let him make the mistakes that he always makes on some other team.
Draft the OT in round 1.
-
-03-10-2009 #18
-
-03-10-2009 #19
-
-03-10-2009 #20
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
Why can't we just take Jason Smith with the 2nd pick. Then trade back into the late 1st round and take James Laurinaitis? IMO Laurinaitis is a cheaper maybe better MLB (not SLB) than Curry.
I had a mock Rams draft on this trade between the Rams and Patriots:
Patriots get:
Rams 2nd round pick
Rams 3rd round pick
Note: according to the Trade Draft Value Chart this is worth 810 points.
Rams get:
Pats 1st round pick
Pats 4th round pick
Note: this is worth 814 points. Not much of a difference so it is a goo trade.
The patriots would do it because they dont like paying 1st round pick money to rookies. Also they have back to back picks and may fill 2 important needs. They just lost Vrabel (trade) and Seymour (FA) so they can take Sintim and Ayers back-to-back. If they stayed at 23 they would have taken Laurinaitis as a back-up 1st rounder until Brucechi retired. Now they fill in 2 holes and can make another run (damn those patriots).
-
-03-10-2009 #21
-
-03-10-2009 #22
Re: OT PACE Released ! Now who do we Draft?
(This post made the argument easier for me...)
Or...we can possibly end up benefiting from his performance next season (the contract year, BECAUSE based on your 'all players play better the last year of their contract logic' he very well should..), and then see what deal he'd be looking for come the offseaon. You do realize that just because he has a good contract year, it doesn't mean we're obligated to resign him...right?
-
-03-10-2009 #23
-
-03-10-2009 #24
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
This is what im talkin about. Since many of you guys are so high on Barron already just because we moved him from the right side to the left side which doesnt really mean he will stop all his false starts let me speculate with Barron as a long term LT. We will still need a RT.
Do you guys know how much we will have to pay to our starting backfield?
Action Jackson: 6.11 mil (2009)
Marc Bulger: 6.5 mil (2009)
Brian Leonard (FB for now): 460,000 (2009)
That is a total of 13.07 Milli that we are going to spend on our starting backfield next year (we might sign Karney so it might be more). So lets provide time for our biggest long term expenses.
Cuz right now Bulger is looking like a career 3rd stringer! Why dont we protected him so he can prove somthing to the rest of the league. (i exaggerated the 3rd string to prove a point)
Action Jackson looks like a waste of money that can't even stay healthy for a season. 2006 one hit wonder. So why dont we get him some run blocking so he can prove that he is washed up (i go to Rutgers and trust me i hear this sooooooo many times "Jackson is a washed up scrub")
Lets protect our superstars!!!!!!
With Pace gone we dont have that guy on the outside. I dont think Barron is too good in the Run Game.
-
-03-10-2009 #25
-
-03-10-2009 #26
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
What makes him qualified?
Spags said before that Action Jackson is going to be our centerpiece to the Offence!!!!!!!!
Jason Smith is a former TE with great athleticism so he can lead block for Jackson and get down the field. Which basically means he can get to the 2nd level. Smith is great in Pass protection. Smith just has that demeanor that just makes him look kinda like Pace. He is very agressive. and if you remember in the begging when devaney became GM he said we want to get bigger more physical. Well this guy Jason Smith is very very physical.
They said he wasnt strong enough but his bench press drill will prove those people wrong. His footwork needs help and he is still learning the position but from what i have heard he has an extremly good work ethic so he can easily improve that with our new coaching staff full of teachers.
Monroe or J. Smith not Curry. We dont have Pace anymore.
-
-03-10-2009 #27
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
are you trying to compare Vernon Gholston to Jason Smith??
a top 5 OT is low risk.
Look at Vernon Gholston his combine performance made him an elite prospect however he could not contribute in the NFL. Aaron Curry also had a good combine. So Curry is more similar to Gholston than Jason Smith is.
Im not saying Curry will be bad at the pro level im just saying that Jason SMith is a bigger need and a lower risk.
-
-03-10-2009 #28
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
From the looks of it, we're going to be a run-heavy team from now on. Pass-protection, while still a big deal, isn't AS big of a deal like before. You got to keep in mind that Barron was serviceable when filling in for Pace. I'm not saying he played at a hall-of-fame level, but the guy wasn't horrible.
Once again, we're going to run the ball a lot and Barron's a better run than pass-blocker. You also have to figure that MOST of the rookie tackles will take awhile to adjust to pass-protecting in the NFL, so we might not have much of an upgrade over Barron anyway..at least to start off. This especially goes for Jason Smith.
I think most of you are forgetting the complete overhaul of the offensive line we could be looking at if we do in fact move Barron and Bell (The one player returning to the same position would be Incognito). We'd also be a hell of a lot more bigger and even skilled IMO. Barron with better blockers makes it a lot easier on him and less likely to screw up.
-
-03-10-2009 #29
Re: Pace gone. Aaron Curry talks gone too?
You completely overlooked the intent of the post. You acted as if Mayock and Kiper perfectly plan how prospects will turn out when it's all said and done...
Hence be bringing up Gholston, who both equally salivated over..
Before the combine, the hype wasn't there. Kind of like Smith.
Lower-risk? You said it yourself...the kid was a former tight-end. You threw in the athletic argument..well, Ok. That will get you by in college most definitely, but this is the NFL. The fact that the kid came from nowhere is what worries me about selecting him.
Curry and Gholston only compare at being linebackers. Two completely different kids. Plus, looks as if you missed the point of the Gholston reference too.Last edited by IzzyHigh1212; -03-10-2009 at 09:33 PM.
-
-03-10-2009 #30
Similar Threads
-
Scott Wright interview with Aaron Curry
By thoey in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 13Last Post: -04-22-2009, 11:29 PM -
Chat w/ Jim Thomas - Feb 24th
By Nick in forum RAM TALKReplies: 4Last Post: -02-25-2009, 07:01 PM -
Curry Overcomes Obstacles on way to Top
By Nick in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 3Last Post: -02-24-2009, 10:13 PM -
Who is Aaron Curry?
By RamsInfiniti in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 13Last Post: -12-25-2008, 12:49 PM -
Pace weighs in on his stance in contract talks
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 15Last Post: -09-10-2004, 06:36 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote



Bookmarks